在2019-2022年SARS-CoV-2大流行之前和期间推出抗生素管理干预措施的单中心经验。

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Drugs in Context Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.7573/dic.2022-7-5
Zahra Kassamali Escobar, Todd Bouchard, Cameron Buck, Kamaldeep Sandhu, Chloe Bryson-Cahn
{"title":"在2019-2022年SARS-CoV-2大流行之前和期间推出抗生素管理干预措施的单中心经验。","authors":"Zahra Kassamali Escobar,&nbsp;Todd Bouchard,&nbsp;Cameron Buck,&nbsp;Kamaldeep Sandhu,&nbsp;Chloe Bryson-Cahn","doi":"10.7573/dic.2022-7-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antibiotics are prescribed to nearly one-half of patients with viral respiratory tract infections (RTI) in outpatient settings. This use is ineffective and may cause undue harm and excess cost from unnecessary antibiotic exposure. We implemented a multifaceted intervention to address inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for viral RTI. Here, we discuss the impact over 4 years, before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study describes the implementation and initial impact of a multimodal stewardship intervention on inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for viral RTIs in outpatient care settings at a single centre. We tracked the rate of visits for viral RTI as well as antibiotic prescribing for viral RTIs in urgent care, primary care and the emergency department between January 2018 and March 2022. Data were collected 1 year prior to implementation and 3 years after implementation. The primary outcome - the rate of inappropriate antibiotics prescribed for viral RTIs - was described by calendar year (CY) to review changes after the stewardship intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In CY2018, the year prior to implementation of targeted RTI antimicrobial stewardship, the rate of inappropriate RTI antibiotics prescribed was 10% in urgent care, 11% in primary care and 18% in the emergency department (ED). During the first CY of the intervention, rates were 8% in urgent care, 10% in primary care and 16% in the ED. In CY2020, the second year of the intervention, inappropriate RTI antibiotics were prescribed in 5% of urgent care and 3% primary care RTI visits and 15% of ED RTI visits. These rates were similar in CY2021 and the first 3 months of CY2022. Over 30,000 visits for RTIs were seen annually in CY2018 and CY2019. Annual RTI visits dropped to 20,222 in CY2020 and 14,172 in CY2021.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although total visits for non-COVID RTIs decreased by approximately 50% during the first 2 years of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, an antimicrobial stewardship intervention was associated with decreases in inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for RTIs. This was maintained throughout 2 years of the pandemic.This article is part of the <i>Antibiotic stewardship</i> Special Issue: https://www.drugsincontext.com/special_issues/antimicrobial-stewardship-a-focus-on-the-need-for-moderation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11362,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"12 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/13/48/dic-2022-7-5.PMC9949760.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A single-centre experience rolling out an antibiotic stewardship intervention prior to and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic 2019-2022.\",\"authors\":\"Zahra Kassamali Escobar,&nbsp;Todd Bouchard,&nbsp;Cameron Buck,&nbsp;Kamaldeep Sandhu,&nbsp;Chloe Bryson-Cahn\",\"doi\":\"10.7573/dic.2022-7-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antibiotics are prescribed to nearly one-half of patients with viral respiratory tract infections (RTI) in outpatient settings. This use is ineffective and may cause undue harm and excess cost from unnecessary antibiotic exposure. We implemented a multifaceted intervention to address inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for viral RTI. Here, we discuss the impact over 4 years, before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study describes the implementation and initial impact of a multimodal stewardship intervention on inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for viral RTIs in outpatient care settings at a single centre. We tracked the rate of visits for viral RTI as well as antibiotic prescribing for viral RTIs in urgent care, primary care and the emergency department between January 2018 and March 2022. Data were collected 1 year prior to implementation and 3 years after implementation. The primary outcome - the rate of inappropriate antibiotics prescribed for viral RTIs - was described by calendar year (CY) to review changes after the stewardship intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In CY2018, the year prior to implementation of targeted RTI antimicrobial stewardship, the rate of inappropriate RTI antibiotics prescribed was 10% in urgent care, 11% in primary care and 18% in the emergency department (ED). During the first CY of the intervention, rates were 8% in urgent care, 10% in primary care and 16% in the ED. In CY2020, the second year of the intervention, inappropriate RTI antibiotics were prescribed in 5% of urgent care and 3% primary care RTI visits and 15% of ED RTI visits. These rates were similar in CY2021 and the first 3 months of CY2022. Over 30,000 visits for RTIs were seen annually in CY2018 and CY2019. Annual RTI visits dropped to 20,222 in CY2020 and 14,172 in CY2021.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although total visits for non-COVID RTIs decreased by approximately 50% during the first 2 years of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, an antimicrobial stewardship intervention was associated with decreases in inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for RTIs. This was maintained throughout 2 years of the pandemic.This article is part of the <i>Antibiotic stewardship</i> Special Issue: https://www.drugsincontext.com/special_issues/antimicrobial-stewardship-a-focus-on-the-need-for-moderation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs in Context\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/13/48/dic-2022-7-5.PMC9949760.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs in Context\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.2022-7-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs in Context","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.2022-7-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在门诊环境中,近一半的病毒性呼吸道感染(RTI)患者使用抗生素。这种使用是无效的,可能会造成不必要的伤害和不必要的抗生素暴露带来的额外费用。我们实施了一项多方面的干预措施,以解决病毒性呼吸道感染的不当抗生素处方。在这里,我们讨论了SARS-CoV-2大流行之前和期间的4年影响。方法:本观察性研究描述了在单个中心的门诊护理环境中,对病毒性呼吸道感染不适当抗生素处方的多模式管理干预的实施和初步影响。我们跟踪了2018年1月至2022年3月期间急诊、初级保健和急诊科的病毒性呼吸道感染就诊率以及病毒性呼吸道感染的抗生素处方。数据收集于实施前1年和实施后3年。主要结果——病毒性呼吸道感染处方不适当抗生素的比率——按日历年(CY)描述,以审查管理干预后的变化。结果:2018年CY2018,即实施针对性RTI抗菌药物管理的前一年,急诊、初级保健和急诊科(ED)的RTI抗生素处方不当率分别为10%、11%和18%。在干预的第一个CY中,紧急护理的比例为8%,初级保健的比例为10%,急诊科的比例为16%。在干预的第二年2020 CY2020中,急诊科和初级保健RTI就诊的比例分别为5%和3%,急诊科RTI就诊的比例为15%。这些比率在2021年和2022年的前3个月相似。2018年和2019年,rti的年访问量超过3万人次。年度RTI访问量下降到2020年的20222次和2021年的14172次。结论:尽管在SARS-CoV-2大流行的前两年,非covid - RTIs的总就诊人数减少了约50%,但抗菌药物管理干预与RTIs不适当抗生素处方的减少有关。这种情况在大流行的两年中一直保持着。这篇文章是抗生素管理特刊的一部分:https://www.drugsincontext.com/special_issues/antimicrobial-stewardship-a-focus-on-the-need-for-moderation。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A single-centre experience rolling out an antibiotic stewardship intervention prior to and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic 2019-2022.

Background: Antibiotics are prescribed to nearly one-half of patients with viral respiratory tract infections (RTI) in outpatient settings. This use is ineffective and may cause undue harm and excess cost from unnecessary antibiotic exposure. We implemented a multifaceted intervention to address inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for viral RTI. Here, we discuss the impact over 4 years, before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Methods: This observational study describes the implementation and initial impact of a multimodal stewardship intervention on inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for viral RTIs in outpatient care settings at a single centre. We tracked the rate of visits for viral RTI as well as antibiotic prescribing for viral RTIs in urgent care, primary care and the emergency department between January 2018 and March 2022. Data were collected 1 year prior to implementation and 3 years after implementation. The primary outcome - the rate of inappropriate antibiotics prescribed for viral RTIs - was described by calendar year (CY) to review changes after the stewardship intervention.

Results: In CY2018, the year prior to implementation of targeted RTI antimicrobial stewardship, the rate of inappropriate RTI antibiotics prescribed was 10% in urgent care, 11% in primary care and 18% in the emergency department (ED). During the first CY of the intervention, rates were 8% in urgent care, 10% in primary care and 16% in the ED. In CY2020, the second year of the intervention, inappropriate RTI antibiotics were prescribed in 5% of urgent care and 3% primary care RTI visits and 15% of ED RTI visits. These rates were similar in CY2021 and the first 3 months of CY2022. Over 30,000 visits for RTIs were seen annually in CY2018 and CY2019. Annual RTI visits dropped to 20,222 in CY2020 and 14,172 in CY2021.

Conclusion: Although total visits for non-COVID RTIs decreased by approximately 50% during the first 2 years of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, an antimicrobial stewardship intervention was associated with decreases in inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for RTIs. This was maintained throughout 2 years of the pandemic.This article is part of the Antibiotic stewardship Special Issue: https://www.drugsincontext.com/special_issues/antimicrobial-stewardship-a-focus-on-the-need-for-moderation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs in Context
Drugs in Context Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Covers all phases of original research: laboratory, animal and human/clinical studies, health economics and outcomes research, and postmarketing studies. Original research that shows positive or negative results are welcomed. Invited review articles may cover single-drug reviews, drug class reviews, latest advances in drug therapy, therapeutic-area reviews, place-in-therapy reviews, new pathways and classes of drugs. In addition, systematic reviews and meta-analyses are welcomed and may be published as original research if performed per accepted guidelines. Editorials of key topics and issues in drugs and therapeutics are welcomed. The Editor-in-Chief will also consider manuscripts of interest in areas such as technologies that support diagnosis, assessment and treatment. EQUATOR Network reporting guidelines should be followed for each article type. GPP3 Guidelines should be followed for any industry-sponsored manuscripts. Other Editorial sections may include Editorial, Case Report, Conference Report, Letter-to-the-Editor, Educational Section.
期刊最新文献
Good scientific practice of using worldwide post-marketing surveillance data to ensure safety with HAALI BDDE cross-linked hyaluronic acid fillers. Inclisiran for the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia. Liquid antipsychotics in the management of psychomotor agitation: a focus on promazine. Patient journey in cystinosis: focus on non-adherence and disease management. Pharmacovigilance monitoring and treatment adherence in patients on antihypertensive drugs at a tertiary care centre.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1