患者对液体管理的看法:家庭和中心血液透析的多中心比较研究

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Journal of renal care Pub Date : 2022-05-30 DOI:10.1111/jorc.12426
Megan Glyde BSc, Ed Sutherland PhD, Louise Dye PhD, Sandip Mitra MD, FRCP, David Keane PhD
{"title":"患者对液体管理的看法:家庭和中心血液透析的多中心比较研究","authors":"Megan Glyde BSc,&nbsp;Ed Sutherland PhD,&nbsp;Louise Dye PhD,&nbsp;Sandip Mitra MD, FRCP,&nbsp;David Keane PhD","doi":"10.1111/jorc.12426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>There is increasing worldwide interest in person-centred care in haemodialysis and home haemodialysis (HHD). Intradialytic fluid management is a vital component of haemodialysis, and often a shared decision, yet patients' perspectives and experience of related decisions are largely unexplored.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To explore the perspectives of patients receiving home or incentre haemodialysis (IHD), in relation to intradialytic fluid management.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A multicentre cross-sectional survey.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>Eight hundred and thirty-nine patients receiving IHD and 99 patients receiving HHD, across six English renal units.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Measurements</h3>\n \n <p>Self-reported measures of understanding, experiences and control of fluid management, and willingness to achieve target weight. An objective test of patients' ability to relate common signs and symptoms to fluid overload or excessive ultrafiltration.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Patients receiving HHD had greater knowledge than those receiving IHD (66.1% vs. 42.3%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) about causes of common signs and symptoms which remained when controlling for age, education and years since beginning haemodialysis. Patients receiving HHD felt more in control of and had greater self-reported adherence to fluid management (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), yet knowledge gaps existed in both cohorts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Greater patient knowledge and its practice in HHD may contribute to improved fluid balance and outcomes. Whilst patient selection may contribute towards these differences, the training patients receive when opting for HHD and subsequent experience are likely to be key contributing factors. Integrating aspects of education on fluid management from HHD training programmes should be considered in IHD, and further targeted, robust education remains an unmet need.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of renal care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jorc.12426","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients' perspectives of fluid management: A multicentre comparative study of home and incentre haemodialysis\",\"authors\":\"Megan Glyde BSc,&nbsp;Ed Sutherland PhD,&nbsp;Louise Dye PhD,&nbsp;Sandip Mitra MD, FRCP,&nbsp;David Keane PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jorc.12426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is increasing worldwide interest in person-centred care in haemodialysis and home haemodialysis (HHD). Intradialytic fluid management is a vital component of haemodialysis, and often a shared decision, yet patients' perspectives and experience of related decisions are largely unexplored.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To explore the perspectives of patients receiving home or incentre haemodialysis (IHD), in relation to intradialytic fluid management.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>A multicentre cross-sectional survey.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Participants</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eight hundred and thirty-nine patients receiving IHD and 99 patients receiving HHD, across six English renal units.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Measurements</h3>\\n \\n <p>Self-reported measures of understanding, experiences and control of fluid management, and willingness to achieve target weight. An objective test of patients' ability to relate common signs and symptoms to fluid overload or excessive ultrafiltration.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients receiving HHD had greater knowledge than those receiving IHD (66.1% vs. 42.3%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) about causes of common signs and symptoms which remained when controlling for age, education and years since beginning haemodialysis. Patients receiving HHD felt more in control of and had greater self-reported adherence to fluid management (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), yet knowledge gaps existed in both cohorts.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Greater patient knowledge and its practice in HHD may contribute to improved fluid balance and outcomes. Whilst patient selection may contribute towards these differences, the training patients receive when opting for HHD and subsequent experience are likely to be key contributing factors. Integrating aspects of education on fluid management from HHD training programmes should be considered in IHD, and further targeted, robust education remains an unmet need.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of renal care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jorc.12426\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of renal care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jorc.12426\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of renal care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jorc.12426","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界范围内对血液透析和家庭血液透析(HHD)的以人为中心的护理越来越感兴趣。透析液管理是血液透析的一个重要组成部分,通常是一个共同的决定,但患者的观点和相关决定的经验在很大程度上未被探索。目的探讨接受家庭或中心血液透析(IHD)的患者在透析液管理方面的观点。设计多中心横断面调查。参与者:来自英国6个肾科室的839名IHD患者和99名HHD患者。自我报告的对流体管理的理解、经验和控制,以及达到目标体重的意愿。对患者将常见体征和症状与液体超载或过度超滤联系起来的能力进行客观测试。结果在控制年龄、受教育程度和开始血液透析的时间后,HHD患者比IHD患者对常见体征和症状的原因了解程度更高(66.1%比42.3%,p < 0.001)。接受HHD治疗的患者感觉更能控制病情,并且自我报告的液体管理依从性更高(p < 0.01),但两组患者都存在知识差距。结论:提高HHD患者的知识和实践可能有助于改善体液平衡和预后。虽然患者选择可能导致这些差异,但患者在选择HHD时接受的培训和随后的经验可能是关键因素。应在儿童发展方案中考虑整合儿童发展方案培训方案中有关流动管理的教育的各个方面,而进一步有针对性的、强有力的教育仍然是一个未得到满足的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patients' perspectives of fluid management: A multicentre comparative study of home and incentre haemodialysis

Background

There is increasing worldwide interest in person-centred care in haemodialysis and home haemodialysis (HHD). Intradialytic fluid management is a vital component of haemodialysis, and often a shared decision, yet patients' perspectives and experience of related decisions are largely unexplored.

Objectives

To explore the perspectives of patients receiving home or incentre haemodialysis (IHD), in relation to intradialytic fluid management.

Design

A multicentre cross-sectional survey.

Participants

Eight hundred and thirty-nine patients receiving IHD and 99 patients receiving HHD, across six English renal units.

Measurements

Self-reported measures of understanding, experiences and control of fluid management, and willingness to achieve target weight. An objective test of patients' ability to relate common signs and symptoms to fluid overload or excessive ultrafiltration.

Results

Patients receiving HHD had greater knowledge than those receiving IHD (66.1% vs. 42.3%, p < 0.001) about causes of common signs and symptoms which remained when controlling for age, education and years since beginning haemodialysis. Patients receiving HHD felt more in control of and had greater self-reported adherence to fluid management (p < 0.01), yet knowledge gaps existed in both cohorts.

Conclusions

Greater patient knowledge and its practice in HHD may contribute to improved fluid balance and outcomes. Whilst patient selection may contribute towards these differences, the training patients receive when opting for HHD and subsequent experience are likely to be key contributing factors. Integrating aspects of education on fluid management from HHD training programmes should be considered in IHD, and further targeted, robust education remains an unmet need.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of renal care
Journal of renal care Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Journal of Renal Care (JORC), formally EDTNA/ERCA Journal, is the official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Nursing Association/European Renal Care Association (EDTNA/ERCA). The Journal of Renal Care is an international peer-reviewed journal for the multi-professional health care team caring for people with kidney disease and those who research this specialised area of health care. Kidney disease is a chronic illness with four basic treatments: haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis conservative management and transplantation, which includes emptive transplantation, living donor & cadavaric transplantation. The continuous world-wide increase of people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) means that research and shared knowledge into the causes and treatment is vital to delay the progression of CKD and to improve treatments and the care given. The Journal of Renal Care is an important journal for all health-care professionals working in this and associated conditions, such as diabetes and cardio-vascular disease amongst others. It covers the trajectory of the disease from the first diagnosis to palliative care and includes acute renal injury. The Journal of Renal Care accepts that kidney disease affects not only the patients but also their families and significant others and provides a forum for both the psycho-social and physiological aspects of the disease.
期刊最新文献
Use of toe systolic blood pressures and toe brachial pressure indices in people receiving dialysis: A scoping review. Cultural and linguistic diversity is associated with increased inter-dialytic weight gain among patients on long-term haemodialysis. Perspectives of Chinese nephrology nurses on discussing sexual dysfunction with patients receiving haemodialysis: A qualitative study Self-efficacy and home dialysis: An integrative review. Understanding nurses' perceptions of sexual health and function in people requiring haemodialysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1