“我怎么能不提呢?”当黑人来访者在会议上讨论反黑人种族主义时,治疗师的舒适感的多个案例研究。

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1037/pst0000404
Theodore T Bartholomew, Andres E Pérez-Rojas, Rashanta Bledman, Eileen E Joy, Krista A Robbins
{"title":"“我怎么能不提呢?”当黑人来访者在会议上讨论反黑人种族主义时,治疗师的舒适感的多个案例研究。","authors":"Theodore T Bartholomew,&nbsp;Andres E Pérez-Rojas,&nbsp;Rashanta Bledman,&nbsp;Eileen E Joy,&nbsp;Krista A Robbins","doi":"10.1037/pst0000404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anti-Black racism is often overlooked in predominantly White spaces such as psychotherapy. This pervasive disregard and dehumanization reflects the perpetuation of ongoing racial trauma that can influence the psychological health of Black people seeking psychotherapy. Therapists, therefore, ought to be equipped and comfortable to have conversations about anti-Blackness and anti-Black racism in sessions, though evidence suggests they are often uncomfortable discussing race and racism in practice. To understand therapists' comfort when clients discuss anti-Black racism, we used a multiple case study approach to interview five practicing clinicians (two White, two Black, one biracial Asian and White). Within-case analysis elicited a sense of participants' personal experiences of being comfortable, and at times less so, when clients discussed having endured anti-Black racism. Cross-case analysis led to the identification of four themes: (a) Beyond Acknowledgment, (b) Drawing Personal Awareness into the Moment, (c) Engaging with One's Own Emotional Responses, and (d) I Am versus I Should: Proactive and Reactive Comfort. These findings are discussed within the scope of multicultural competence, multicultural orientation, and the value of cultural comfort when clients' discuss anti-Black racism. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":"60 1","pages":"63-75"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"How could I not bring it up?\\\": A multiple case study of therapists' comfort when Black clients discuss anti-Black racism in sessions.\",\"authors\":\"Theodore T Bartholomew,&nbsp;Andres E Pérez-Rojas,&nbsp;Rashanta Bledman,&nbsp;Eileen E Joy,&nbsp;Krista A Robbins\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pst0000404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Anti-Black racism is often overlooked in predominantly White spaces such as psychotherapy. This pervasive disregard and dehumanization reflects the perpetuation of ongoing racial trauma that can influence the psychological health of Black people seeking psychotherapy. Therapists, therefore, ought to be equipped and comfortable to have conversations about anti-Blackness and anti-Black racism in sessions, though evidence suggests they are often uncomfortable discussing race and racism in practice. To understand therapists' comfort when clients discuss anti-Black racism, we used a multiple case study approach to interview five practicing clinicians (two White, two Black, one biracial Asian and White). Within-case analysis elicited a sense of participants' personal experiences of being comfortable, and at times less so, when clients discussed having endured anti-Black racism. Cross-case analysis led to the identification of four themes: (a) Beyond Acknowledgment, (b) Drawing Personal Awareness into the Moment, (c) Engaging with One's Own Emotional Responses, and (d) I Am versus I Should: Proactive and Reactive Comfort. These findings are discussed within the scope of multicultural competence, multicultural orientation, and the value of cultural comfort when clients' discuss anti-Black racism. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"63-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000404\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000404","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在心理治疗等以白人为主的领域,反黑人种族主义经常被忽视。这种普遍的漠视和非人化反映了持续不断的种族创伤,这种创伤会影响寻求心理治疗的黑人的心理健康。因此,治疗师应该准备好,并且能够在治疗中轻松地谈论反黑人和反黑人种族主义,尽管有证据表明,他们在实际讨论种族和种族主义时往往感到不舒服。为了了解治疗师在客户讨论反黑人种族主义时的安慰程度,我们采用了多案例研究的方法采访了五位执业临床医生(两位白人,两位黑人,一位亚裔和白人混血儿)。个案分析引出了参与者的一种舒适的个人体验,有时不太舒服,当客户讨论忍受反黑人种族主义时。跨案例分析确定了四个主题:(a)超越承认,(b)将个人意识引入当下,(c)参与自己的情绪反应,以及(d)我是与我应该:主动和被动舒适。当客户讨论反黑人种族主义时,这些发现在多元文化能力、多元文化取向和文化舒适的价值范围内进行了讨论。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"How could I not bring it up?": A multiple case study of therapists' comfort when Black clients discuss anti-Black racism in sessions.

Anti-Black racism is often overlooked in predominantly White spaces such as psychotherapy. This pervasive disregard and dehumanization reflects the perpetuation of ongoing racial trauma that can influence the psychological health of Black people seeking psychotherapy. Therapists, therefore, ought to be equipped and comfortable to have conversations about anti-Blackness and anti-Black racism in sessions, though evidence suggests they are often uncomfortable discussing race and racism in practice. To understand therapists' comfort when clients discuss anti-Black racism, we used a multiple case study approach to interview five practicing clinicians (two White, two Black, one biracial Asian and White). Within-case analysis elicited a sense of participants' personal experiences of being comfortable, and at times less so, when clients discussed having endured anti-Black racism. Cross-case analysis led to the identification of four themes: (a) Beyond Acknowledgment, (b) Drawing Personal Awareness into the Moment, (c) Engaging with One's Own Emotional Responses, and (d) I Am versus I Should: Proactive and Reactive Comfort. These findings are discussed within the scope of multicultural competence, multicultural orientation, and the value of cultural comfort when clients' discuss anti-Black racism. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy
Psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training publishes a wide variety of articles relevant to the field of psychotherapy. The journal strives to foster interactions among individuals involved with training, practice theory, and research since all areas are essential to psychotherapy. This journal is an invaluable resource for practicing clinical and counseling psychologists, social workers, and mental health professionals.
期刊最新文献
A cultural adaptation of acceptance and commitment therapy with exercise for older Chinese with chronic pain and depressive symptoms: A mixed-methods study. Toward a liberatory counseling and psychotherapy theories pedagogy and curriculum. Increasing outcome measurement precision: Network analysis of items on the Outcome Questionnaire-45. Physiological regulation processes differentiate the experience of ruptures between patient and therapist. Questioning the status quo: Latino community members as researchers in the study of health equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1