感觉神经夹带治疗急性和慢性疼痛的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.3 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY British Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1177/20494637221139472
Rhys Maddison, Hamde Nazar, Ilona Obara, Quoc C Vuong
{"title":"感觉神经夹带治疗急性和慢性疼痛的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Rhys Maddison,&nbsp;Hamde Nazar,&nbsp;Ilona Obara,&nbsp;Quoc C Vuong","doi":"10.1177/20494637221139472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Changes to the power of neural oscillations in cortical and sub-cortical structures can change pain perception. Rhythmic sensory stimulation is a non-invasive method that can increase power in specific frequencies of neural oscillations. If the stimulation frequency targets those frequencies related to pain perception, such as alpha or theta frequencies, there can be a reduction in perceived pain intensity. Thus, sensory neural entrainment may provide an alternative to pharmacological intervention for acute and chronic pain. This review aimed to identify and critically appraise the evidence on the effectiveness of sensory entrainment methods for pain perception.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook a systematic search across Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science and Scopus in November 2020 to identify studies investigating the efficacy of sensory entrainment on adults. We assessed studies for their quality using the PRISMA checklist. A random-effects model was used in a meta-analysis to measure the effect of entrainment on pain perception.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our systematic review yielded nine studies fitting the search criteria. Studies investigated the effect of visual and auditory entrainment on pain intensity rating, electrophysiological markers of pain and amount of analgesia needed during surgery. The meta-analysis suggests that alpha (8-13 Hz) sensory entrainment is effective for acute pain perception, whereas theta (4-7 Hz) entrainment is effective for chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although there is heterogeneity in the current evidence, our review highlights the potential use of sensory entrainment to affect acute and chronic pain. Further research is required regarding the timing, duration and frequency of the stimulation to determine the best application for maximum efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":"17 2","pages":"126-141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10088425/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of sensory neural entrainment on acute and chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Rhys Maddison,&nbsp;Hamde Nazar,&nbsp;Ilona Obara,&nbsp;Quoc C Vuong\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20494637221139472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Changes to the power of neural oscillations in cortical and sub-cortical structures can change pain perception. Rhythmic sensory stimulation is a non-invasive method that can increase power in specific frequencies of neural oscillations. If the stimulation frequency targets those frequencies related to pain perception, such as alpha or theta frequencies, there can be a reduction in perceived pain intensity. Thus, sensory neural entrainment may provide an alternative to pharmacological intervention for acute and chronic pain. This review aimed to identify and critically appraise the evidence on the effectiveness of sensory entrainment methods for pain perception.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook a systematic search across Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science and Scopus in November 2020 to identify studies investigating the efficacy of sensory entrainment on adults. We assessed studies for their quality using the PRISMA checklist. A random-effects model was used in a meta-analysis to measure the effect of entrainment on pain perception.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our systematic review yielded nine studies fitting the search criteria. Studies investigated the effect of visual and auditory entrainment on pain intensity rating, electrophysiological markers of pain and amount of analgesia needed during surgery. The meta-analysis suggests that alpha (8-13 Hz) sensory entrainment is effective for acute pain perception, whereas theta (4-7 Hz) entrainment is effective for chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although there is heterogeneity in the current evidence, our review highlights the potential use of sensory entrainment to affect acute and chronic pain. Further research is required regarding the timing, duration and frequency of the stimulation to determine the best application for maximum efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"126-141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10088425/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637221139472\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637221139472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:皮层和皮层下结构的神经振荡能力的改变可以改变痛觉。有节奏的感觉刺激是一种非侵入性的方法,可以增加特定频率的神经振荡的功率。如果刺激频率的目标是与疼痛感知相关的频率,比如α或θ频率,那么感知到的疼痛强度就会降低。因此,感觉神经夹带可以为急性和慢性疼痛提供替代药物干预的方法。这篇综述旨在识别和批判性地评估关于疼痛感知的感觉夹带方法有效性的证据。方法:我们于2020年11月在Medline、Embase、PsycInfo、Web of Science和Scopus上进行了系统搜索,以确定调查感官娱乐对成人疗效的研究。我们使用PRISMA检查表评估研究的质量。在荟萃分析中使用随机效应模型来测量夹带对疼痛感知的影响。结果:我们的系统综述得出了9项符合搜索标准的研究。研究探讨了视觉和听觉夹带对疼痛强度等级、疼痛电生理指标和手术中需要的镇痛量的影响。meta分析表明,alpha(8-13赫兹)感觉刺激对急性疼痛感知有效,而theta(4-7赫兹)感觉刺激对慢性疼痛感知有效。结论:尽管目前的证据存在异质性,但我们的综述强调了感觉夹带对急性和慢性疼痛的潜在影响。需要进一步研究刺激的时间、持续时间和频率,以确定最佳的应用方法以获得最大的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The efficacy of sensory neural entrainment on acute and chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Changes to the power of neural oscillations in cortical and sub-cortical structures can change pain perception. Rhythmic sensory stimulation is a non-invasive method that can increase power in specific frequencies of neural oscillations. If the stimulation frequency targets those frequencies related to pain perception, such as alpha or theta frequencies, there can be a reduction in perceived pain intensity. Thus, sensory neural entrainment may provide an alternative to pharmacological intervention for acute and chronic pain. This review aimed to identify and critically appraise the evidence on the effectiveness of sensory entrainment methods for pain perception.

Methods: We undertook a systematic search across Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science and Scopus in November 2020 to identify studies investigating the efficacy of sensory entrainment on adults. We assessed studies for their quality using the PRISMA checklist. A random-effects model was used in a meta-analysis to measure the effect of entrainment on pain perception.

Results: Our systematic review yielded nine studies fitting the search criteria. Studies investigated the effect of visual and auditory entrainment on pain intensity rating, electrophysiological markers of pain and amount of analgesia needed during surgery. The meta-analysis suggests that alpha (8-13 Hz) sensory entrainment is effective for acute pain perception, whereas theta (4-7 Hz) entrainment is effective for chronic pain.

Conclusions: Although there is heterogeneity in the current evidence, our review highlights the potential use of sensory entrainment to affect acute and chronic pain. Further research is required regarding the timing, duration and frequency of the stimulation to determine the best application for maximum efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Pain
British Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: British Journal of Pain is a peer-reviewed quarterly British journal with an international multidisciplinary Editorial Board. The journal publishes original research and reviews on all major aspects of pain and pain management. Reviews reflect the body of evidence of the topic and are suitable for a multidisciplinary readership. Where empirical evidence is lacking, the reviews reflect the generally held opinions of experts in the field. The Journal has broadened its scope and has become a forum for publishing primary research together with brief reports related to pain and pain interventions. Submissions from all over the world have been published and are welcome. Official journal of the British Pain Society.
期刊最新文献
'I want to know that it's worth me attending': A qualitative analysis of consumers' decisions not to attend their chronic pain group education session. Patient experience of discharge opioid analgesia and care provision following spine surgery: A mixed methods study. Psychedelics and chronic pain: self-reported outcomes on changed substance use patterns and health following naturalistic psychedelic use. Chronic pain as a long-term burden for veterans. Social prescribing for adults with chronic pain in the U.K.: a rapid review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1