Sarah C Sutherland, Harry S Shannon, David Ayuku, David L Streiner, Olli Saarela, Lukoye Atwoli, Paula Braitstein
{"title":"肯尼亚西部孤儿和失散青少年心理弹性、护理环境和社会心理因素之间的关系。","authors":"Sarah C Sutherland, Harry S Shannon, David Ayuku, David L Streiner, Olli Saarela, Lukoye Atwoli, Paula Braitstein","doi":"10.1080/17450128.2022.2067381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relationships between care environment, resilience, and social factors in orphaned and separated adolescents and youths (OSAY) in western Kenya are complex and under-studied. This study examines these relationships through the analysis of survey responses from OSAY living in Charitable Children's Institutes (CCI) and family-based care settings (FBS) in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. The associations between 1) care environment and resilience (measured using the 14-item Resilience Scale); 2) care environment and factors thought to promote resilience (e.g. social, family, and peer support); and 3) resilience and these same resilience-promoting factors, were examined using multivariable linear and logistic regressions. This cross-sectional study included 1202 OSAY (50.4% female) aged 10-26 (mean=16; SD=3.5). The mean resilience score in CCIs was 71 (95%CI=69-73) vs. 64 (95%CI=62-66) in FBS. OSAY in CCIs had higher resilience (β=7.67; 95%CI=5.26-10.09), social support (β=0.26; 95%CI=0.14-0.37), and peer support (β=0.90; 95%CI=0.64-1.17) than those in FBS. OSAY in CCIs were more likely to volunteer than those in FBS (OR=3.72; 95%CI=1.80-7.68), except in the male subgroup. Family (β=0.42; 95%CI=0.24-0.60), social (β=4.19; 95%CI=2.53-5.85), and peer (β=2.13; 95%CI=1.44-2.83) relationships were positively associated with resilience in all analyses. Volunteering was positively associated with resilience (β=5.85; 95%CI=1.51-10.19). The factor most strongly related to resilience in both fully adjusted models was peer support. This study found a strong relationship between care environment and resilience. Care environment and resilience each independently demonstrated strong relationships with peer support, social support, and participating in volunteer activities. Resilience also had a strong relationship with familial support. These data suggest that resilience can be developed through strategic supports to this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":46101,"journal":{"name":"Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies","volume":"17 2","pages":"165-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302592/pdf/nihms-1804052.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationships between resilience, care environment, and social-psychological factors in orphaned and separated adolescents in western Kenya.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah C Sutherland, Harry S Shannon, David Ayuku, David L Streiner, Olli Saarela, Lukoye Atwoli, Paula Braitstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17450128.2022.2067381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The relationships between care environment, resilience, and social factors in orphaned and separated adolescents and youths (OSAY) in western Kenya are complex and under-studied. This study examines these relationships through the analysis of survey responses from OSAY living in Charitable Children's Institutes (CCI) and family-based care settings (FBS) in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. The associations between 1) care environment and resilience (measured using the 14-item Resilience Scale); 2) care environment and factors thought to promote resilience (e.g. social, family, and peer support); and 3) resilience and these same resilience-promoting factors, were examined using multivariable linear and logistic regressions. This cross-sectional study included 1202 OSAY (50.4% female) aged 10-26 (mean=16; SD=3.5). The mean resilience score in CCIs was 71 (95%CI=69-73) vs. 64 (95%CI=62-66) in FBS. OSAY in CCIs had higher resilience (β=7.67; 95%CI=5.26-10.09), social support (β=0.26; 95%CI=0.14-0.37), and peer support (β=0.90; 95%CI=0.64-1.17) than those in FBS. OSAY in CCIs were more likely to volunteer than those in FBS (OR=3.72; 95%CI=1.80-7.68), except in the male subgroup. Family (β=0.42; 95%CI=0.24-0.60), social (β=4.19; 95%CI=2.53-5.85), and peer (β=2.13; 95%CI=1.44-2.83) relationships were positively associated with resilience in all analyses. Volunteering was positively associated with resilience (β=5.85; 95%CI=1.51-10.19). The factor most strongly related to resilience in both fully adjusted models was peer support. This study found a strong relationship between care environment and resilience. Care environment and resilience each independently demonstrated strong relationships with peer support, social support, and participating in volunteer activities. Resilience also had a strong relationship with familial support. These data suggest that resilience can be developed through strategic supports to this vulnerable population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"165-179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302592/pdf/nihms-1804052.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17450128.2022.2067381\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17450128.2022.2067381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
肯尼亚西部孤儿和失散青少年(OSAY)的护理环境、复原力和社会因素之间的关系复杂且研究不足。本研究通过分析生活在肯尼亚瓦辛吉舒县慈善儿童机构(CCI)和基于家庭的护理机构(FBS)的OSAY的调查反馈来检验这些关系。1)护理环境与心理弹性的关系(使用14项心理弹性量表测量);2)被认为促进心理弹性的护理环境和因素(如社会、家庭和同伴支持);3)采用多变量线性回归和逻辑回归对弹性和这些相同的弹性促进因素进行了检验。本横断面研究纳入1202例10-26岁的OSAY患者(50.4%为女性)(平均16岁;SD = 3.5)。CCIs的平均恢复力评分为71分(95%CI=69-73), FBS的平均恢复力评分为64分(95%CI=62-66)。CCIs的OSAY具有更高的恢复力(β=7.67;95%CI=5.26-10.09),社会支持(β=0.26;95%CI=0.14-0.37),同伴支持(β=0.90;95%CI=0.64-1.17)。CCIs中的OSAY比FBS中的OSAY更倾向于自愿(OR=3.72;95%CI=1.80-7.68),男性亚组除外。家庭(β= 0.42;95%CI=0.24-0.60),社会(β=4.19;95%CI=2.53-5.85),同行(β=2.13;95%CI=1.44-2.83)与恢复力呈正相关。志愿服务与心理弹性呈正相关(β=5.85;95% ci = 1.51 - -10.19)。在两个完全调整的模型中,与复原力关系最密切的因素是同伴支持。该研究发现,护理环境与心理弹性之间存在很强的关系。护理环境和恢复力分别与同伴支持、社会支持和参与志愿者活动有很强的关系。适应力也与家庭支持密切相关。这些数据表明,可以通过对这一弱势群体的战略支持来发展复原力。
The relationships between resilience, care environment, and social-psychological factors in orphaned and separated adolescents in western Kenya.
The relationships between care environment, resilience, and social factors in orphaned and separated adolescents and youths (OSAY) in western Kenya are complex and under-studied. This study examines these relationships through the analysis of survey responses from OSAY living in Charitable Children's Institutes (CCI) and family-based care settings (FBS) in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. The associations between 1) care environment and resilience (measured using the 14-item Resilience Scale); 2) care environment and factors thought to promote resilience (e.g. social, family, and peer support); and 3) resilience and these same resilience-promoting factors, were examined using multivariable linear and logistic regressions. This cross-sectional study included 1202 OSAY (50.4% female) aged 10-26 (mean=16; SD=3.5). The mean resilience score in CCIs was 71 (95%CI=69-73) vs. 64 (95%CI=62-66) in FBS. OSAY in CCIs had higher resilience (β=7.67; 95%CI=5.26-10.09), social support (β=0.26; 95%CI=0.14-0.37), and peer support (β=0.90; 95%CI=0.64-1.17) than those in FBS. OSAY in CCIs were more likely to volunteer than those in FBS (OR=3.72; 95%CI=1.80-7.68), except in the male subgroup. Family (β=0.42; 95%CI=0.24-0.60), social (β=4.19; 95%CI=2.53-5.85), and peer (β=2.13; 95%CI=1.44-2.83) relationships were positively associated with resilience in all analyses. Volunteering was positively associated with resilience (β=5.85; 95%CI=1.51-10.19). The factor most strongly related to resilience in both fully adjusted models was peer support. This study found a strong relationship between care environment and resilience. Care environment and resilience each independently demonstrated strong relationships with peer support, social support, and participating in volunteer activities. Resilience also had a strong relationship with familial support. These data suggest that resilience can be developed through strategic supports to this vulnerable population.
期刊介绍:
Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies is an essential peer-reviewed journal analyzing psychological, sociological, health, gender, cultural, economic, and educational aspects of children and adolescents in developed and developing countries. This international publication forum provides a much-needed interdisciplinary focus on vulnerable children and youth at risk, specifically in relation to health and welfare issues, such as mental health, illness (including HIV/AIDS), disability, abuse, neglect, institutionalization, poverty, orphanhood, exploitation, war, famine, and disaster.