Hélène Gil, Barbara Martini, Marjolaine Tichit, Philippe Amat, Sarah Gebeile-Chauty
{"title":"口腔面肌功能再教育:如何处理简单的办公病例?","authors":"Hélène Gil, Barbara Martini, Marjolaine Tichit, Philippe Amat, Sarah Gebeile-Chauty","doi":"10.1684/orthodfr.2023.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The prevalence of lingual dyspraxia is high but not all patients require management by a physical therapist. The aim of this article is to propose a decisional flow chart separating, via diagnostic criteria, patients who can be managed in office from patients requiring oromyofunctional rehabilitation by an oro-myo-functional rehabilitation (OMR) professional and to provide, if necessary, simple exercise sheets.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>An expert, a maxillofacial physiotherapist from the Fournier school, has proposed, based on the literature, her experience as a clinician and in consultation with orthodontists, different criteria for the severity of dyspraxia as well as exercises to be implemented for cases that are manageable in the office.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The decision tree, diagnostic criteria and exercises are provided.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The flowchart is based on the literature, mainly on expert opinion given the low level of evidence of published studies. The exercise sheet was created by a physiotherapist from the Fournier school and necessarily reflects this influence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further studies such as a clinical trial could compare the validity of the WBR indication obtained by an orthodontist using the decision tree with the blinded indication given by a physical therapist. In addition, the effectiveness of in-office rehabilitation could be evaluated using a control group.</p>","PeriodicalId":35927,"journal":{"name":"L'' Orthodontie française","volume":"94 1","pages":"113-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Orofacial myofunctional reeducation: how to handle simple in office cases?\",\"authors\":\"Hélène Gil, Barbara Martini, Marjolaine Tichit, Philippe Amat, Sarah Gebeile-Chauty\",\"doi\":\"10.1684/orthodfr.2023.121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The prevalence of lingual dyspraxia is high but not all patients require management by a physical therapist. The aim of this article is to propose a decisional flow chart separating, via diagnostic criteria, patients who can be managed in office from patients requiring oromyofunctional rehabilitation by an oro-myo-functional rehabilitation (OMR) professional and to provide, if necessary, simple exercise sheets.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>An expert, a maxillofacial physiotherapist from the Fournier school, has proposed, based on the literature, her experience as a clinician and in consultation with orthodontists, different criteria for the severity of dyspraxia as well as exercises to be implemented for cases that are manageable in the office.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The decision tree, diagnostic criteria and exercises are provided.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The flowchart is based on the literature, mainly on expert opinion given the low level of evidence of published studies. The exercise sheet was created by a physiotherapist from the Fournier school and necessarily reflects this influence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further studies such as a clinical trial could compare the validity of the WBR indication obtained by an orthodontist using the decision tree with the blinded indication given by a physical therapist. In addition, the effectiveness of in-office rehabilitation could be evaluated using a control group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"L'' Orthodontie française\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"113-129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"L'' Orthodontie française\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1684/orthodfr.2023.121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"L'' Orthodontie française","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/orthodfr.2023.121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Orofacial myofunctional reeducation: how to handle simple in office cases?
Introduction: The prevalence of lingual dyspraxia is high but not all patients require management by a physical therapist. The aim of this article is to propose a decisional flow chart separating, via diagnostic criteria, patients who can be managed in office from patients requiring oromyofunctional rehabilitation by an oro-myo-functional rehabilitation (OMR) professional and to provide, if necessary, simple exercise sheets.
Material and method: An expert, a maxillofacial physiotherapist from the Fournier school, has proposed, based on the literature, her experience as a clinician and in consultation with orthodontists, different criteria for the severity of dyspraxia as well as exercises to be implemented for cases that are manageable in the office.
Results: The decision tree, diagnostic criteria and exercises are provided.
Discussion: The flowchart is based on the literature, mainly on expert opinion given the low level of evidence of published studies. The exercise sheet was created by a physiotherapist from the Fournier school and necessarily reflects this influence.
Conclusion: Further studies such as a clinical trial could compare the validity of the WBR indication obtained by an orthodontist using the decision tree with the blinded indication given by a physical therapist. In addition, the effectiveness of in-office rehabilitation could be evaluated using a control group.
期刊介绍:
L’Orthodontie Française, organe officiel de communication de la Société Française d’Orthopédie Dento-Faciale, est un journal scientifique de référence depuis 1921, de diffusion internationale, indexé à Medline et référencé à l’Index Medicus et à Bibliodent. Le journal a pour vocation d’accueillir les travaux des membres de la SFODF, des conférenciers ayant communiqué lors des congrès de la Société, ou de tout travail soumis à l’approbation de son comité de rédaction, traitant de l’orthopédie dento-faciale ou de tout sujet en rapport avec cette discipline.