Ananditha Raghunath MS , Dan D. Nguyen MD , Matthew Schram PhD , David Albert MD , Shyamnath Gollakota PhD , Linda Shapiro PhD , Arun R. Sridhar MBBS, MPH, FHRS
{"title":"用于阵发性心房颤动事件预测的人工智能移动心电图","authors":"Ananditha Raghunath MS , Dan D. Nguyen MD , Matthew Schram PhD , David Albert MD , Shyamnath Gollakota PhD , Linda Shapiro PhD , Arun R. Sridhar MBBS, MPH, FHRS","doi":"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) often eludes early diagnosis, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been used to predict AF from sinus rhythm electrocardiograms (ECGs), but AF prediction using sinus rhythm mobile electrocardiograms (mECG) remains unexplored.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of AI to predict AF events prospectively and retrospectively using sinus rhythm mECG data.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We trained a neural network to predict AF events from sinus rhythm mECGs obtained from users of the Alivecor KardiaMobile 6L device. We tested our model on sinus rhythm mECGs within ±0–2 days, ±3–7 days, and ±8–30 days from AF events to determine the optimal screening window. Finally, we tested our model on mECGs from before an AF event to determine whether AF can be predicted prospectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 73,861 users with 267,614 mECGs (mean age 58.14 years; 35% women). Users with paroxysmal AF contributed 60.15% of mECGs. Model performance on the test set comprising control and study samples across all windows of interest showed an area under the curve (AUC) score of 0.760 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.759–0.760), sensitivity of 0.703 (95% CI 0.700–0.705), specificity of 0.684 (95% CI 0.678–0.685), and accuracy of 69.4% (95% CI 0.692–0.700). Model performance was better on ±0–2 day samples (sensitivity 0.711; 95% CI 0.709–0.713) and worse on the ±8–30 day window (sensitivity 0.688; 95% CI 0.685–0.690), with performance on the ±3–7 day window falling in between (sensitivity 0.708; 95% CI 0.704–0.710).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Neural networks can predict AF using a widely scalable and cost-effective mobile technology prospectively and retrospectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72527,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 21-28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5c/ba/main.PMC9971999.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence–enabled mobile electrocardiograms for event prediction in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation\",\"authors\":\"Ananditha Raghunath MS , Dan D. Nguyen MD , Matthew Schram PhD , David Albert MD , Shyamnath Gollakota PhD , Linda Shapiro PhD , Arun R. Sridhar MBBS, MPH, FHRS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) often eludes early diagnosis, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been used to predict AF from sinus rhythm electrocardiograms (ECGs), but AF prediction using sinus rhythm mobile electrocardiograms (mECG) remains unexplored.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of AI to predict AF events prospectively and retrospectively using sinus rhythm mECG data.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We trained a neural network to predict AF events from sinus rhythm mECGs obtained from users of the Alivecor KardiaMobile 6L device. We tested our model on sinus rhythm mECGs within ±0–2 days, ±3–7 days, and ±8–30 days from AF events to determine the optimal screening window. Finally, we tested our model on mECGs from before an AF event to determine whether AF can be predicted prospectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 73,861 users with 267,614 mECGs (mean age 58.14 years; 35% women). Users with paroxysmal AF contributed 60.15% of mECGs. Model performance on the test set comprising control and study samples across all windows of interest showed an area under the curve (AUC) score of 0.760 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.759–0.760), sensitivity of 0.703 (95% CI 0.700–0.705), specificity of 0.684 (95% CI 0.678–0.685), and accuracy of 69.4% (95% CI 0.692–0.700). Model performance was better on ±0–2 day samples (sensitivity 0.711; 95% CI 0.709–0.713) and worse on the ±8–30 day window (sensitivity 0.688; 95% CI 0.685–0.690), with performance on the ±3–7 day window falling in between (sensitivity 0.708; 95% CI 0.704–0.710).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Neural networks can predict AF using a widely scalable and cost-effective mobile technology prospectively and retrospectively.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular digital health journal\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 21-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5c/ba/main.PMC9971999.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular digital health journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693623000026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693623000026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Artificial intelligence–enabled mobile electrocardiograms for event prediction in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
Background
Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) often eludes early diagnosis, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been used to predict AF from sinus rhythm electrocardiograms (ECGs), but AF prediction using sinus rhythm mobile electrocardiograms (mECG) remains unexplored.
Objective
The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of AI to predict AF events prospectively and retrospectively using sinus rhythm mECG data.
Methods
We trained a neural network to predict AF events from sinus rhythm mECGs obtained from users of the Alivecor KardiaMobile 6L device. We tested our model on sinus rhythm mECGs within ±0–2 days, ±3–7 days, and ±8–30 days from AF events to determine the optimal screening window. Finally, we tested our model on mECGs from before an AF event to determine whether AF can be predicted prospectively.
Results
We included 73,861 users with 267,614 mECGs (mean age 58.14 years; 35% women). Users with paroxysmal AF contributed 60.15% of mECGs. Model performance on the test set comprising control and study samples across all windows of interest showed an area under the curve (AUC) score of 0.760 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.759–0.760), sensitivity of 0.703 (95% CI 0.700–0.705), specificity of 0.684 (95% CI 0.678–0.685), and accuracy of 69.4% (95% CI 0.692–0.700). Model performance was better on ±0–2 day samples (sensitivity 0.711; 95% CI 0.709–0.713) and worse on the ±8–30 day window (sensitivity 0.688; 95% CI 0.685–0.690), with performance on the ±3–7 day window falling in between (sensitivity 0.708; 95% CI 0.704–0.710).
Conclusion
Neural networks can predict AF using a widely scalable and cost-effective mobile technology prospectively and retrospectively.