制定正畸固位的专业建议:简短版

Q4 Medicine L'' Orthodontie française Pub Date : 2023-04-28 DOI:10.1684/orthodfr.2023.115
Alexandre Rolland, Olivier Sorel, Sarah Gebeile-Chauty
{"title":"制定正畸固位的专业建议:简短版","authors":"Alexandre Rolland,&nbsp;Olivier Sorel,&nbsp;Sarah Gebeile-Chauty","doi":"10.1684/orthodfr.2023.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Retention is the set of means, processes or devices that contribute to maintain the teeth in the position and the arches in the shape given by the treatment as long as possible. Given the heterogeneity of practices, devices used and follow-up modalities, the French Society of Dentofacial Orthopedics, a scientific society, has proposed Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) for orthodontic retention. This article presents the method used to develop the CPG full-text and the guidelines produced.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A review of the literature was carried out after a bibliographic search of databases. The CPG full-text and guidelines were drafted, graded according to the level of evidence, then reread, discussed and validated by the experts of the workgroup. A second review by a group of external experts was then carried out before final validation of the CPG for publication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 652 articles selected, 53 met the inclusion criteria and were used to prepare the CPG full-text to produce 41 grade C items and 23 expert agreements, constituting 40 guidelines.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There is still no consensus on the choice of materials. The literature remains poor on the functions. Some devices, more used in France, are poorly documented in the literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CPGs provide recommendations on the factors to consider before using a retainer, the effectiveness of the different devices, their failures and adverse effects, as well as the follow-up procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":35927,"journal":{"name":"L'' Orthodontie française","volume":"94 1","pages":"55-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of professional recommendations on orthodontic retention: short version\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Rolland,&nbsp;Olivier Sorel,&nbsp;Sarah Gebeile-Chauty\",\"doi\":\"10.1684/orthodfr.2023.115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Retention is the set of means, processes or devices that contribute to maintain the teeth in the position and the arches in the shape given by the treatment as long as possible. Given the heterogeneity of practices, devices used and follow-up modalities, the French Society of Dentofacial Orthopedics, a scientific society, has proposed Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) for orthodontic retention. This article presents the method used to develop the CPG full-text and the guidelines produced.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A review of the literature was carried out after a bibliographic search of databases. The CPG full-text and guidelines were drafted, graded according to the level of evidence, then reread, discussed and validated by the experts of the workgroup. A second review by a group of external experts was then carried out before final validation of the CPG for publication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 652 articles selected, 53 met the inclusion criteria and were used to prepare the CPG full-text to produce 41 grade C items and 23 expert agreements, constituting 40 guidelines.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There is still no consensus on the choice of materials. The literature remains poor on the functions. Some devices, more used in France, are poorly documented in the literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CPGs provide recommendations on the factors to consider before using a retainer, the effectiveness of the different devices, their failures and adverse effects, as well as the follow-up procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"L'' Orthodontie française\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"55-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"L'' Orthodontie française\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1684/orthodfr.2023.115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"L'' Orthodontie française","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/orthodfr.2023.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:固位是一套手段,过程或设备,有助于保持牙齿的位置和牙弓的形状,尽可能长时间的治疗。鉴于实践、使用的器械和随访方式的异质性,法国牙面矫形学会(一个科学学会)提出了正畸固位的临床实践指南(CPG)。本文介绍了开发CPG全文的方法和产生的指南。材料和方法:在数据库进行书目检索后,对文献进行综述。起草CPG全文和指南,根据证据水平进行分级,然后由工作组专家重新阅读、讨论和验证。在CPG最终确认出版之前,由一组外部专家进行了第二次审查。结果:入选的652篇文章中,53篇符合纳入标准,用于编制CPG全文,生成41个C级条目和23个专家协议,构成40条指南。讨论:在材料的选择上还没有达成共识。关于其功能的文献仍然很少。一些在法国更常用的器械在文献中记录得很少。结论:CPGs就使用固位器前需要考虑的因素、不同装置的有效性、失效和不良反应以及随访程序提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of professional recommendations on orthodontic retention: short version

Introduction: Retention is the set of means, processes or devices that contribute to maintain the teeth in the position and the arches in the shape given by the treatment as long as possible. Given the heterogeneity of practices, devices used and follow-up modalities, the French Society of Dentofacial Orthopedics, a scientific society, has proposed Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) for orthodontic retention. This article presents the method used to develop the CPG full-text and the guidelines produced.

Materials and methods: A review of the literature was carried out after a bibliographic search of databases. The CPG full-text and guidelines were drafted, graded according to the level of evidence, then reread, discussed and validated by the experts of the workgroup. A second review by a group of external experts was then carried out before final validation of the CPG for publication.

Results: Of 652 articles selected, 53 met the inclusion criteria and were used to prepare the CPG full-text to produce 41 grade C items and 23 expert agreements, constituting 40 guidelines.

Discussion: There is still no consensus on the choice of materials. The literature remains poor on the functions. Some devices, more used in France, are poorly documented in the literature.

Conclusion: The CPGs provide recommendations on the factors to consider before using a retainer, the effectiveness of the different devices, their failures and adverse effects, as well as the follow-up procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
L'' Orthodontie française
L'' Orthodontie française Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: L’Orthodontie Française, organe officiel de communication de la Société Française d’Orthopédie Dento-Faciale, est un journal scientifique de référence depuis 1921, de diffusion internationale, indexé à Medline et référencé à l’Index Medicus et à Bibliodent. Le journal a pour vocation d’accueillir les travaux des membres de la SFODF, des conférenciers ayant communiqué lors des congrès de la Société, ou de tout travail soumis à l’approbation de son comité de rédaction, traitant de l’orthopédie dento-faciale ou de tout sujet en rapport avec cette discipline.
期刊最新文献
Orofacial myofunctional reeducation assisted by a prefabricated reeducation appliance: towards a necessary paradigm shift The « patient casting »: a key decision in orthognathic surgery How to adapt orthodontic treatment for a patient with a general pathology? Review of the literature based on six scenarios that challenge the practitioner Simultaneous rehabilitation of the tongue and breathing: a physiological necessity Repousser les limites des possibilités de mise en place des canines incluses maxillaires ou mandibulaires avec le système simplifié CT8. Un entretien avec Daniel Chillès, Sylvia Riemenschneider-Chillès et Jean-Gabriel Chillès.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1