快速成型注塑模具的设计与验证。

IF 2.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing Pub Date : 2023-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-12 DOI:10.1089/3dp.2021.0132
Yannic Lay, Robin Roj, Martin Bonnet, Ralf Theiß, Peter Dültgen
{"title":"快速成型注塑模具的设计与验证。","authors":"Yannic Lay, Robin Roj, Martin Bonnet, Ralf Theiß, Peter Dültgen","doi":"10.1089/3dp.2021.0132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The injection molding process is only economical with large batch sizes due to expensive tools that cannot be used variably. Additively manufactured tools made of plastic could reduce manufacturing costs and represent an alternative to conventionally manufactured tools for prototype applications as well as enabling small series with the injection molding process. The aim of this article was to examine additively manufactured injection molding tools; to determine their potential in terms of service life, surface quality, and production time; and to link them with the production costs so that the profitability can be assessed. Therefore, a reference component and an injection mold have been designed. To test the capabilities of different 3D printing techniques and materials, three molds have been produced by fused filament fabrication (FFF), one by PolyJet process, one by digital light processing, and for a direct comparison to conventional methods, one mold has been milled from aluminum. All molds have been tested in two series. First, they were used under the same conditions over a period of 100 injection molding cycles. Based on the knowledge obtained and an additional profitability analysis, three forms could be identified as promising. Two of these forms could be further investigated in a second series of tests. Based on all experiments, the technical feasibility of additively manufactured injection molds for small batch production could be confirmed. It could be evaluated that each manufacturing process and every material has some advantages and disadvantages. On the one hand, temperature-resistant thermoplastics can be processed with FFF, which can withstand service lives of more than 150 cycles without any signs of wear and are therefore suitable for small series. On the other hand, the PolyJet process achieves good surface qualities and short production times, which means that it can be used for prototype applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":54341,"journal":{"name":"3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing","volume":"10 2","pages":"226-235"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10133974/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design and Validation of Additively Manufactured Injection Molds.\",\"authors\":\"Yannic Lay, Robin Roj, Martin Bonnet, Ralf Theiß, Peter Dültgen\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/3dp.2021.0132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The injection molding process is only economical with large batch sizes due to expensive tools that cannot be used variably. Additively manufactured tools made of plastic could reduce manufacturing costs and represent an alternative to conventionally manufactured tools for prototype applications as well as enabling small series with the injection molding process. The aim of this article was to examine additively manufactured injection molding tools; to determine their potential in terms of service life, surface quality, and production time; and to link them with the production costs so that the profitability can be assessed. Therefore, a reference component and an injection mold have been designed. To test the capabilities of different 3D printing techniques and materials, three molds have been produced by fused filament fabrication (FFF), one by PolyJet process, one by digital light processing, and for a direct comparison to conventional methods, one mold has been milled from aluminum. All molds have been tested in two series. First, they were used under the same conditions over a period of 100 injection molding cycles. Based on the knowledge obtained and an additional profitability analysis, three forms could be identified as promising. Two of these forms could be further investigated in a second series of tests. Based on all experiments, the technical feasibility of additively manufactured injection molds for small batch production could be confirmed. It could be evaluated that each manufacturing process and every material has some advantages and disadvantages. On the one hand, temperature-resistant thermoplastics can be processed with FFF, which can withstand service lives of more than 150 cycles without any signs of wear and are therefore suitable for small series. On the other hand, the PolyJet process achieves good surface qualities and short production times, which means that it can be used for prototype applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"226-235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10133974/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2021.0132\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2021.0132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

注塑成型工艺由于工具昂贵且不能变通使用,只有大批量生产时才经济实惠。由塑料制成的快速成型工具可以降低制造成本,是传统制造工具的替代品,可用于原型应用,并可通过注塑成型工艺实现小批量生产。本文旨在研究快速成型注塑模具,确定其在使用寿命、表面质量和生产时间方面的潜力,并将其与生产成本联系起来,以评估其盈利能力。因此,我们设计了一个参考部件和一个注塑模具。为了测试不同三维打印技术和材料的能力,我们使用熔融长丝制造(FFF)技术制造了三个模具,使用 PolyJet 工艺制造了一个模具,使用数字光处理技术制造了一个模具。所有模具都经过了两个系列的测试。首先,它们在相同条件下使用了 100 个注塑成型周期。根据所获得的知识和额外的盈利分析,可以确定三种形式很有前途。其中两种可在第二系列试验中进一步研究。在所有试验的基础上,可以确认快速成型注塑模具用于小批量生产的技术可行性。可以评估的是,每种制造工艺和每种材料都有一些优点和缺点。一方面,耐高温热塑性塑料可采用 FFF 工艺加工,其使用寿命可超过 150 次,且无任何磨损迹象,因此适用于小批量生产。另一方面,PolyJet 工艺可实现良好的表面质量和较短的生产时间,这意味着它可用于原型应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Design and Validation of Additively Manufactured Injection Molds.

The injection molding process is only economical with large batch sizes due to expensive tools that cannot be used variably. Additively manufactured tools made of plastic could reduce manufacturing costs and represent an alternative to conventionally manufactured tools for prototype applications as well as enabling small series with the injection molding process. The aim of this article was to examine additively manufactured injection molding tools; to determine their potential in terms of service life, surface quality, and production time; and to link them with the production costs so that the profitability can be assessed. Therefore, a reference component and an injection mold have been designed. To test the capabilities of different 3D printing techniques and materials, three molds have been produced by fused filament fabrication (FFF), one by PolyJet process, one by digital light processing, and for a direct comparison to conventional methods, one mold has been milled from aluminum. All molds have been tested in two series. First, they were used under the same conditions over a period of 100 injection molding cycles. Based on the knowledge obtained and an additional profitability analysis, three forms could be identified as promising. Two of these forms could be further investigated in a second series of tests. Based on all experiments, the technical feasibility of additively manufactured injection molds for small batch production could be confirmed. It could be evaluated that each manufacturing process and every material has some advantages and disadvantages. On the one hand, temperature-resistant thermoplastics can be processed with FFF, which can withstand service lives of more than 150 cycles without any signs of wear and are therefore suitable for small series. On the other hand, the PolyJet process achieves good surface qualities and short production times, which means that it can be used for prototype applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing
3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing Materials Science-Materials Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for world-class research in additive manufacturing and related technologies. The Journal explores emerging challenges and opportunities ranging from new developments of processes and materials, to new simulation and design tools, and informative applications and case studies. Novel applications in new areas, such as medicine, education, bio-printing, food printing, art and architecture, are also encouraged. The Journal addresses the important questions surrounding this powerful and growing field, including issues in policy and law, intellectual property, data standards, safety and liability, environmental impact, social, economic, and humanitarian implications, and emerging business models at the industrial and consumer scales.
期刊最新文献
Experimental Study on Interfacial Shear Behavior of 3D Printed Recycled Mortar. Characterizing the Effect of Filament Moisture on Tensile Properties and Morphology of Fused Deposition Modeled Polylactic Acid/Polybutylene Succinate Parts. On the Development of Smart Framework for Printability Maps in Additive Manufacturing of AISI 316L Stainless Steel. Rapid Fabrication of Silica Microlens Arrays via Glass 3D Printing. Simulation of Binder Jetting and Analysis of Magnesium Alloy Bonding Mechanism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1