与家禽养殖相关的职业性生物气溶胶暴露。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Agromedicine Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-26 DOI:10.1080/1059924X.2023.2206405
Dikeledi O Matuka, Dorothy Ngajilo, Roslynn Baatjies, Payal Dayal, Mohamed F Jeebhay, Tanusha S Singh
{"title":"与家禽养殖相关的职业性生物气溶胶暴露。","authors":"Dikeledi O Matuka,&nbsp;Dorothy Ngajilo,&nbsp;Roslynn Baatjies,&nbsp;Payal Dayal,&nbsp;Mohamed F Jeebhay,&nbsp;Tanusha S Singh","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2023.2206405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate occupational exposure to particulate dust, endotoxin, and (1-3)-β-D-glucan among workers involved in various poultry farming activities. A total of 298 personal samples were collected from randomly selected individuals from exposure groups based on distinct poultry farming activities comprising broiler farms, rearing, laying, hatchery, and catching activities. Aside from the inhalable particulate dust concentration that was determined, filter extracts were also analyzed for (1-3)-β-D-glucan and endotoxin using the endpoint Glucatell® and Limulus amoebocyte lysate (LAL) assays, respectively. Data were analyzed using STATA 12 and linear regression models developed. The mean (GM) dust particulate concentration was 11.04 mg/m<sup>3</sup> (GSD = 3.87); 2298 endotoxin units (EU/m<sup>3</sup>) (GSD = 10.56) and 149 ng/m<sup>3</sup> for (1-3)-β-D-glucan (GSD = 4.62). A modest positive correlation was observed between log-transformed endotoxin and (1-3)-β-D-glucan concentrations (Pearson <i>r</i> = 0.44, <i>p</i> < .001), whilst a moderate negative correlation was observed for inhalable dust particulate and (1-3)-β-D-glucan (Pearson <i>r</i> = -0.33, <i>p</i> < .001). However, there was a very poor correlation between inhalable dust and endotoxin (Pearson <i>r</i> = -0.02, <i>p</i> < .001). In the regression models, exposure group based on the nature of farming activity explained 50% of the variability in dust particulate and glucan levels. For dust particulate, rearing activities were significant predictors of higher dust levels compared to hatchery work, while rearing, laying, broiler and catching activities were significant predictors of higher endotoxin or glucan levels. Furthermore, working in a small broiler was a significant determinant of elevated glucan exposures. Farms using automated laying activities had significantly higher particulate levels compared to those using manual laying activities. This study revealed that workers engaged in poultry farming activities were exposed to significantly high levels of inhalable particulate dust, endotoxin, and (1-3)-β-D-glucan concentrations, posing an increased risk for adverse respiratory health effects in these farm workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupational Bioaerosol Exposures Associated with Poultry Farming.\",\"authors\":\"Dikeledi O Matuka,&nbsp;Dorothy Ngajilo,&nbsp;Roslynn Baatjies,&nbsp;Payal Dayal,&nbsp;Mohamed F Jeebhay,&nbsp;Tanusha S Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1059924X.2023.2206405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate occupational exposure to particulate dust, endotoxin, and (1-3)-β-D-glucan among workers involved in various poultry farming activities. A total of 298 personal samples were collected from randomly selected individuals from exposure groups based on distinct poultry farming activities comprising broiler farms, rearing, laying, hatchery, and catching activities. Aside from the inhalable particulate dust concentration that was determined, filter extracts were also analyzed for (1-3)-β-D-glucan and endotoxin using the endpoint Glucatell® and Limulus amoebocyte lysate (LAL) assays, respectively. Data were analyzed using STATA 12 and linear regression models developed. The mean (GM) dust particulate concentration was 11.04 mg/m<sup>3</sup> (GSD = 3.87); 2298 endotoxin units (EU/m<sup>3</sup>) (GSD = 10.56) and 149 ng/m<sup>3</sup> for (1-3)-β-D-glucan (GSD = 4.62). A modest positive correlation was observed between log-transformed endotoxin and (1-3)-β-D-glucan concentrations (Pearson <i>r</i> = 0.44, <i>p</i> < .001), whilst a moderate negative correlation was observed for inhalable dust particulate and (1-3)-β-D-glucan (Pearson <i>r</i> = -0.33, <i>p</i> < .001). However, there was a very poor correlation between inhalable dust and endotoxin (Pearson <i>r</i> = -0.02, <i>p</i> < .001). In the regression models, exposure group based on the nature of farming activity explained 50% of the variability in dust particulate and glucan levels. For dust particulate, rearing activities were significant predictors of higher dust levels compared to hatchery work, while rearing, laying, broiler and catching activities were significant predictors of higher endotoxin or glucan levels. Furthermore, working in a small broiler was a significant determinant of elevated glucan exposures. Farms using automated laying activities had significantly higher particulate levels compared to those using manual laying activities. This study revealed that workers engaged in poultry farming activities were exposed to significantly high levels of inhalable particulate dust, endotoxin, and (1-3)-β-D-glucan concentrations, posing an increased risk for adverse respiratory health effects in these farm workers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agromedicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agromedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2023.2206405\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agromedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2023.2206405","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在调查参与各种家禽养殖活动的工人职业性接触颗粒粉尘、内毒素和(1-3)-β-D-葡聚糖的情况。根据不同的家禽养殖活动,包括肉鸡养殖场、饲养、产蛋、孵化和捕获活动,从暴露组中随机选择个体,共收集298份个人样本。除了确定的可吸入颗粒物粉尘浓度外,还分别使用终点Glucatell®和鲎变形虫细胞裂解物(LAL)分析过滤器提取物的(1-3)-β-D-葡聚糖和内毒素。使用STATA 12和开发的线性回归模型对数据进行分析。平均(GM)尘粒浓度为11.04 mg/m3(GSD = 3.87);2298内毒素单位(EU/m3)(GSD = 10.56)和149 ng/m3的(1-3)-β-D-葡聚糖(GSD = 4.62)。在对数转化内毒素和(1-3)-β-D-葡聚糖浓度之间观察到适度的正相关(Pearson r = 0.44,p r = -0.33,p r = -0.02,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Occupational Bioaerosol Exposures Associated with Poultry Farming.

This study aimed to investigate occupational exposure to particulate dust, endotoxin, and (1-3)-β-D-glucan among workers involved in various poultry farming activities. A total of 298 personal samples were collected from randomly selected individuals from exposure groups based on distinct poultry farming activities comprising broiler farms, rearing, laying, hatchery, and catching activities. Aside from the inhalable particulate dust concentration that was determined, filter extracts were also analyzed for (1-3)-β-D-glucan and endotoxin using the endpoint Glucatell® and Limulus amoebocyte lysate (LAL) assays, respectively. Data were analyzed using STATA 12 and linear regression models developed. The mean (GM) dust particulate concentration was 11.04 mg/m3 (GSD = 3.87); 2298 endotoxin units (EU/m3) (GSD = 10.56) and 149 ng/m3 for (1-3)-β-D-glucan (GSD = 4.62). A modest positive correlation was observed between log-transformed endotoxin and (1-3)-β-D-glucan concentrations (Pearson r = 0.44, p < .001), whilst a moderate negative correlation was observed for inhalable dust particulate and (1-3)-β-D-glucan (Pearson r = -0.33, p < .001). However, there was a very poor correlation between inhalable dust and endotoxin (Pearson r = -0.02, p < .001). In the regression models, exposure group based on the nature of farming activity explained 50% of the variability in dust particulate and glucan levels. For dust particulate, rearing activities were significant predictors of higher dust levels compared to hatchery work, while rearing, laying, broiler and catching activities were significant predictors of higher endotoxin or glucan levels. Furthermore, working in a small broiler was a significant determinant of elevated glucan exposures. Farms using automated laying activities had significantly higher particulate levels compared to those using manual laying activities. This study revealed that workers engaged in poultry farming activities were exposed to significantly high levels of inhalable particulate dust, endotoxin, and (1-3)-β-D-glucan concentrations, posing an increased risk for adverse respiratory health effects in these farm workers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agromedicine
Journal of Agromedicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
20.80%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agromedicine: Practice, Policy, and Research publishes translational research, reports and editorials related to agricultural health, safety and medicine. The Journal of Agromedicine seeks to engage the global agricultural health and safety community including rural health care providers, agricultural health and safety practitioners, academic researchers, government agencies, policy makers, and others. The Journal of Agromedicine is committed to providing its readers with relevant, rigorously peer-reviewed, original articles. The journal welcomes high quality submissions as they relate to agricultural health and safety in the areas of: • Behavioral and Mental Health • Climate Change • Education/Training • Emerging Practices • Environmental Public Health • Epidemiology • Ergonomics • Injury Prevention • Occupational and Industrial Health • Pesticides • Policy • Safety Interventions and Evaluation • Technology
期刊最新文献
"I Do Not Have the Time of Being sick": Para-Occupational Exposure and Women's Health Risk Perception in an Agricultural Community. Farmworker-Relevant Heat Exposure in Different Crop and Shade Conditions. Mental Health Among LGBTQ+ Farmers in the United States. Age Group-Wise Burden of Non-Communicable Diseases Among Shrimp Cultivators in India: A Retrospective Analysis of Disability-Adjusted Life Years Method. Telling Tales: Using Vignettes to Overcome Optimism Bias in Farm Health and Safety Attitudinal Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1