寰椎横后孔的流行及形态测定。

Q3 Medicine Acta medica academica Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.5644/ama2006-124.388
Christos Lyrtzis, George Tsakotos, Michael Kostares, Maria Piagkou, Chrysovalantis Mariorakis, Konstantinos Natsis
{"title":"寰椎横后孔的流行及形态测定。","authors":"Christos Lyrtzis,&nbsp;George Tsakotos,&nbsp;Michael Kostares,&nbsp;Maria Piagkou,&nbsp;Chrysovalantis Mariorakis,&nbsp;Konstantinos Natsis","doi":"10.5644/ama2006-124.388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current study records the prevalence of the accessory foramen, located posterior to the transverse foramen (TF), the so-called the retrotransverse foramen (RTF), its morphometry, exact location, and coexistence with ossified posterior bridges. Additionally, factors associated with the length of the RTF are investigated.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>One-hundred and forty-one dried atlas vertebrae were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven out of the 141 vertebrae (26.2%) had at least one RTF. The RTF was unilateral in 67.6% and bilateral in 32.4%. The mean RTF anteroposterior diameter (length) was 4.2±1.4 mm on the right and 3.8±1.0 mm on the left side. The mean RTF laterolateral diameter (width) was 2.6±1.2 mm on the right and 2.5±0.8 mm on the left side. Both dimensions were symmetrical. The RTF was symmetrically located from the TF, at a mean distance of 4.6±1.1 mm on the right and of 4.5±0.9 mm on the left side. For the given TF-RTF distance, laterality, and presence of posterior bridges, each mm increase in the RTF width was associated with a 0.74 mm increase in the relevant length.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The estimated prevalence was higher than most of those reported in other studies. However, the between-studies prevalence varies to a significant degree. Hence, a systematic review and meta-analysis should be performed to identify a more precise estimate due to the clinical importance of the RTF.</p>","PeriodicalId":38313,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica academica","volume":"51 3","pages":"189-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/54/40/AMA-51-189.PMC10116178.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Prevalence and Morphometry of the Atlas Vertebra Retrotransverse Foramen.\",\"authors\":\"Christos Lyrtzis,&nbsp;George Tsakotos,&nbsp;Michael Kostares,&nbsp;Maria Piagkou,&nbsp;Chrysovalantis Mariorakis,&nbsp;Konstantinos Natsis\",\"doi\":\"10.5644/ama2006-124.388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current study records the prevalence of the accessory foramen, located posterior to the transverse foramen (TF), the so-called the retrotransverse foramen (RTF), its morphometry, exact location, and coexistence with ossified posterior bridges. Additionally, factors associated with the length of the RTF are investigated.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>One-hundred and forty-one dried atlas vertebrae were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven out of the 141 vertebrae (26.2%) had at least one RTF. The RTF was unilateral in 67.6% and bilateral in 32.4%. The mean RTF anteroposterior diameter (length) was 4.2±1.4 mm on the right and 3.8±1.0 mm on the left side. The mean RTF laterolateral diameter (width) was 2.6±1.2 mm on the right and 2.5±0.8 mm on the left side. Both dimensions were symmetrical. The RTF was symmetrically located from the TF, at a mean distance of 4.6±1.1 mm on the right and of 4.5±0.9 mm on the left side. For the given TF-RTF distance, laterality, and presence of posterior bridges, each mm increase in the RTF width was associated with a 0.74 mm increase in the relevant length.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The estimated prevalence was higher than most of those reported in other studies. However, the between-studies prevalence varies to a significant degree. Hence, a systematic review and meta-analysis should be performed to identify a more precise estimate due to the clinical importance of the RTF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta medica academica\",\"volume\":\"51 3\",\"pages\":\"189-198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/54/40/AMA-51-189.PMC10116178.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta medica academica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5644/ama2006-124.388\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica academica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5644/ama2006-124.388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究记录了位于横孔(TF)后方的副孔(即所谓的后横孔(RTF))的流行情况、其形态、确切位置以及与骨化后桥的共存情况。此外,研究了与RTF长度相关的因素。材料:研究了141块干椎体。结果:141个椎体中有37个(26.2%)至少有一个RTF。单侧RTF占67.6%,双侧RTF占32.4%。右侧RTF前后径(长度)平均为4.2±1.4 mm,左侧RTF前后径(长度)平均为3.8±1.0 mm。右侧RTF外侧直径(宽度)平均为2.6±1.2 mm,左侧RTF外侧直径(宽度)平均为2.5±0.8 mm。两个维度都是对称的。RTF与TF对称分布,右侧平均距离4.6±1.1 mm,左侧平均距离4.5±0.9 mm。对于给定的TF-RTF距离、侧度和存在后桥,RTF宽度每增加mm,相关长度增加0.74 mm。结论:估计患病率高于大多数其他研究报告。然而,研究之间的患病率差异很大。因此,由于RTF的临床重要性,应该进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,以确定更精确的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Prevalence and Morphometry of the Atlas Vertebra Retrotransverse Foramen.

Objective: The current study records the prevalence of the accessory foramen, located posterior to the transverse foramen (TF), the so-called the retrotransverse foramen (RTF), its morphometry, exact location, and coexistence with ossified posterior bridges. Additionally, factors associated with the length of the RTF are investigated.

Materials: One-hundred and forty-one dried atlas vertebrae were examined.

Results: Thirty-seven out of the 141 vertebrae (26.2%) had at least one RTF. The RTF was unilateral in 67.6% and bilateral in 32.4%. The mean RTF anteroposterior diameter (length) was 4.2±1.4 mm on the right and 3.8±1.0 mm on the left side. The mean RTF laterolateral diameter (width) was 2.6±1.2 mm on the right and 2.5±0.8 mm on the left side. Both dimensions were symmetrical. The RTF was symmetrically located from the TF, at a mean distance of 4.6±1.1 mm on the right and of 4.5±0.9 mm on the left side. For the given TF-RTF distance, laterality, and presence of posterior bridges, each mm increase in the RTF width was associated with a 0.74 mm increase in the relevant length.

Conclusion: The estimated prevalence was higher than most of those reported in other studies. However, the between-studies prevalence varies to a significant degree. Hence, a systematic review and meta-analysis should be performed to identify a more precise estimate due to the clinical importance of the RTF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta medica academica
Acta medica academica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Gastrocolic Trunk: Anatomical Variations and Surgical Significance. Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Tumors in Children and Adolescents. A Rare Cadaveric Case Report of the Median Nerve Passing Through the Brachialis Muscle. Criterion Validity of the Yale Physical Activity Survey (YPAS) in Croatian Older Adults. Workplace Violence Against Nurses in Croatia: A Cross-Sectional Study on Its Frequency, Impact, and Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1