以居住在社区的老年人为样本验证葡萄牙版社会隔离量表

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Sciences Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.03.002
João Tavares , Ana Faria , Delphine Gonçalves , Diana Mendes , Sofia Silva , Liliana Sousa
{"title":"以居住在社区的老年人为样本验证葡萄牙版社会隔离量表","authors":"João Tavares ,&nbsp;Ana Faria ,&nbsp;Delphine Gonçalves ,&nbsp;Diana Mendes ,&nbsp;Sofia Silva ,&nbsp;Liliana Sousa","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties (reliability and validity) of the Social Isolation Scale (SIS) in a sample of Portuguese community-dwelling older adults.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A transversal descriptive study was carried out with a convenience sample of 250 community-dwelling older adults (≥65 years). The survey comprised a sociodemographic questionnaire, SIS, Geriatric Depression Scale-4 (GDS-4), 6-item Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS-6), a loneliness self-assessment question, and Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). Construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis) and convergent validity were analyzed, and ISI internal reliability (composite reliability), external reliability (test-retest, intraclass correlation coefficient) and inter-rater reliability (Cohen’s kappa coefficient) were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Confirmatory factor analysis showed a two-factor model with an excellent index of fit. The SIS showed significant correlations with LSNS-6 (<em>r</em><sub><em>s</em></sub> = 0.47), SWLS (<em>r</em><sub><em>s</em></sub> = 0.26), the loneliness self-assessment question (<em>r</em><sub>s</sub> = 0.35), and GDS-4 (<em>r</em><sub><em>s</em></sub> = −0.16). SIS composite reliability was good (0.708). The inter-class correlation coefficient varied from 0.84 to 0.98. The Cohen’s kappa coefficient ranged from 0.936 to 1.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>SIS has been shown to be a valid and reliable instrument for assessing social isolation among Portuguese community-dwelling older adults. Healthcare professionals, particularly nurses working in community settings, can use SIS to assess social isolation in older adults to design, implement, and evaluate interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10148258/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Portuguese version of the social isolation scale with a sample of community-dwelling older adults\",\"authors\":\"João Tavares ,&nbsp;Ana Faria ,&nbsp;Delphine Gonçalves ,&nbsp;Diana Mendes ,&nbsp;Sofia Silva ,&nbsp;Liliana Sousa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.03.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties (reliability and validity) of the Social Isolation Scale (SIS) in a sample of Portuguese community-dwelling older adults.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A transversal descriptive study was carried out with a convenience sample of 250 community-dwelling older adults (≥65 years). The survey comprised a sociodemographic questionnaire, SIS, Geriatric Depression Scale-4 (GDS-4), 6-item Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS-6), a loneliness self-assessment question, and Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). Construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis) and convergent validity were analyzed, and ISI internal reliability (composite reliability), external reliability (test-retest, intraclass correlation coefficient) and inter-rater reliability (Cohen’s kappa coefficient) were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Confirmatory factor analysis showed a two-factor model with an excellent index of fit. The SIS showed significant correlations with LSNS-6 (<em>r</em><sub><em>s</em></sub> = 0.47), SWLS (<em>r</em><sub><em>s</em></sub> = 0.26), the loneliness self-assessment question (<em>r</em><sub>s</sub> = 0.35), and GDS-4 (<em>r</em><sub><em>s</em></sub> = −0.16). SIS composite reliability was good (0.708). The inter-class correlation coefficient varied from 0.84 to 0.98. The Cohen’s kappa coefficient ranged from 0.936 to 1.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>SIS has been shown to be a valid and reliable instrument for assessing social isolation among Portuguese community-dwelling older adults. Healthcare professionals, particularly nurses working in community settings, can use SIS to assess social isolation in older adults to design, implement, and evaluate interventions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10148258/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013223000248\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013223000248","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本研究的目的是分析葡萄牙社区老年人社会隔离量表(SIS)的心理测量特性(可靠性和有效性)。方法对250名社区老年人(≥65岁)进行横向描述性研究。该调查包括社会人口学问卷、SIS、老年抑郁量表-4(GDS-4)、六项Lubben社交网络量表(LSNS-6)、孤独自我评估问题和生活满意度量表(SWLS)。分析构念有效性(验证性因素分析)和收敛有效性,评估ISI内部信度(复合信度)、外部信度(重测,组内相关系数)和评分者间信度(Cohen’s kappa系数)。结果验证性因子分析显示,该模型具有良好的拟合指数。SIS与LSNS-6(rs=0.47)、SWLS(rs=0.26)、孤独自我评估问题(rs=0.35)和GDS-4(rs=-0.16)呈显著相关。SIS综合信度良好(0.708)。类间相关系数在0.84-0.98之间。Cohen’s kappa系数在0.936到1之间。结论SSIS已被证明是评估葡萄牙社区老年人社会隔离的有效和可靠的工具。医疗保健专业人员,特别是在社区环境中工作的护士,可以使用SIS来评估老年人的社会隔离,以设计、实施和评估干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of the Portuguese version of the social isolation scale with a sample of community-dwelling older adults

Objectives

The aim of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties (reliability and validity) of the Social Isolation Scale (SIS) in a sample of Portuguese community-dwelling older adults.

Methods

A transversal descriptive study was carried out with a convenience sample of 250 community-dwelling older adults (≥65 years). The survey comprised a sociodemographic questionnaire, SIS, Geriatric Depression Scale-4 (GDS-4), 6-item Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS-6), a loneliness self-assessment question, and Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). Construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis) and convergent validity were analyzed, and ISI internal reliability (composite reliability), external reliability (test-retest, intraclass correlation coefficient) and inter-rater reliability (Cohen’s kappa coefficient) were evaluated.

Results

Confirmatory factor analysis showed a two-factor model with an excellent index of fit. The SIS showed significant correlations with LSNS-6 (rs = 0.47), SWLS (rs = 0.26), the loneliness self-assessment question (rs = 0.35), and GDS-4 (rs = −0.16). SIS composite reliability was good (0.708). The inter-class correlation coefficient varied from 0.84 to 0.98. The Cohen’s kappa coefficient ranged from 0.936 to 1.

Conclusions

SIS has been shown to be a valid and reliable instrument for assessing social isolation among Portuguese community-dwelling older adults. Healthcare professionals, particularly nurses working in community settings, can use SIS to assess social isolation in older adults to design, implement, and evaluate interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
408
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: This journal aims to promote excellence in nursing and health care through the dissemination of the latest, evidence-based, peer-reviewed clinical information and original research, providing an international platform for exchanging knowledge, research findings and nursing practice experience. This journal covers a wide range of nursing topics such as advanced nursing practice, bio-psychosocial issues related to health, cultural perspectives, lifestyle change as a component of health promotion, chronic disease, including end-of-life care, family care giving. IJNSS publishes four issues per year in Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct. IJNSS intended readership includes practicing nurses in all spheres and at all levels who are committed to advancing practice and professional development on the basis of new knowledge and evidence; managers and senior members of the nursing; nurse educators and nursing students etc. IJNSS seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Contributions are welcomed from other health professions on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Scanning resources to build an international nursing knowledge network Effectiveness of nurse-led heart failure clinic: A systematic review Reliability and validity of the Italian Version of the Chase Nurse Manager Competencies Scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1