课间休息与小学学龄儿童身体活动、肥胖、心肺和肌肉健康的关系。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS Pediatric Exercise Science Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1123/pes.2021-0190
Kimberly A Clevenger, Melitta A McNarry, Kelly A Mackintosh, David Berrigan
{"title":"课间休息与小学学龄儿童身体活动、肥胖、心肺和肌肉健康的关系。","authors":"Kimberly A Clevenger,&nbsp;Melitta A McNarry,&nbsp;Kelly A Mackintosh,&nbsp;David Berrigan","doi":"10.1123/pes.2021-0190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify associations between amount of school recess provision and children's physical activity (PA), weight status, adiposity, cardiorespiratory endurance, muscular strength, and muscular endurance.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data from 6- to 11-year-old participants (n = 499) in the 2012 National Youth Fitness Survey were analyzed. Parents/guardians reported children's PA levels and recess provision, categorized as no/minimal (9.0%), low (26.1%), medium (46.0%), or high (18.9%). Children wore a wrist-worn accelerometer for 7 days and completed anthropometric measurements. Fitness was assessed using grip strength and treadmill, pull-up, and plank tests. Cross-sectional linear and logistic regression compared outcomes across levels of recess provision adjusting for the survey's complex sampling design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children with high provision of recess were 2.31 times more likely to meet PA guidelines according to parent report than those with no/minimal recess. Accelerometer-measured PA followed a more U-shaped pattern, wherein PA was higher in children with high, compared to low, recess provision but comparable to those with no/minimal recess provision. There were no associations with weight status, adiposity, or fitness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current recess recommendations (20 min·d-1) may be insufficient as 30 minutes per day of recess was associated with a 2-fold greater likelihood of achieving recommended PA levels. Additional research on recess quantity and quality is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49712,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Exercise Science","volume":"35 2","pages":"99-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Recess Provision With Elementary School-Aged Children's Physical Activity, Adiposity, and Cardiorespiratory and Muscular Fitness.\",\"authors\":\"Kimberly A Clevenger,&nbsp;Melitta A McNarry,&nbsp;Kelly A Mackintosh,&nbsp;David Berrigan\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/pes.2021-0190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify associations between amount of school recess provision and children's physical activity (PA), weight status, adiposity, cardiorespiratory endurance, muscular strength, and muscular endurance.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data from 6- to 11-year-old participants (n = 499) in the 2012 National Youth Fitness Survey were analyzed. Parents/guardians reported children's PA levels and recess provision, categorized as no/minimal (9.0%), low (26.1%), medium (46.0%), or high (18.9%). Children wore a wrist-worn accelerometer for 7 days and completed anthropometric measurements. Fitness was assessed using grip strength and treadmill, pull-up, and plank tests. Cross-sectional linear and logistic regression compared outcomes across levels of recess provision adjusting for the survey's complex sampling design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children with high provision of recess were 2.31 times more likely to meet PA guidelines according to parent report than those with no/minimal recess. Accelerometer-measured PA followed a more U-shaped pattern, wherein PA was higher in children with high, compared to low, recess provision but comparable to those with no/minimal recess provision. There were no associations with weight status, adiposity, or fitness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current recess recommendations (20 min·d-1) may be insufficient as 30 minutes per day of recess was associated with a 2-fold greater likelihood of achieving recommended PA levels. Additional research on recess quantity and quality is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49712,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Exercise Science\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"99-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Exercise Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2021-0190\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Exercise Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2021-0190","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:确定学校休息时间与儿童身体活动(PA)、体重状况、肥胖、心肺耐力、肌肉力量和肌肉耐力之间的关系。方法:对2012年全国青少年健康调查中6 ~ 11岁499人的数据进行分析。家长/监护人报告了儿童的PA水平和课间休息规定,分为无/最低(9.0%)、低(26.1%)、中(46.0%)和高(18.9%)。儿童佩戴腕式加速度计7天,并完成人体测量。通过握力、跑步机、引体向上和平板支撑测试来评估健康状况。横截面线性回归和逻辑回归比较了针对调查复杂抽样设计调整的休会供应水平的结果。结果:根据家长报告,课间休息时间高的儿童比没有课间休息或课间休息时间少的儿童更有可能达到护理指南的2.31倍。加速度计测量的PA遵循更多的u形模式,其中高课间休息的儿童的PA高于低课间休息的儿童,但与没有或很少课间休息的儿童相当。与体重状况、肥胖或健康状况没有关联。结论:目前的休息建议(20分钟·d-1)可能不够,因为每天30分钟的休息与达到推荐PA水平的可能性增加2倍有关。需要进一步研究休息的数量和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of Recess Provision With Elementary School-Aged Children's Physical Activity, Adiposity, and Cardiorespiratory and Muscular Fitness.

Purpose: To identify associations between amount of school recess provision and children's physical activity (PA), weight status, adiposity, cardiorespiratory endurance, muscular strength, and muscular endurance.

Method: Data from 6- to 11-year-old participants (n = 499) in the 2012 National Youth Fitness Survey were analyzed. Parents/guardians reported children's PA levels and recess provision, categorized as no/minimal (9.0%), low (26.1%), medium (46.0%), or high (18.9%). Children wore a wrist-worn accelerometer for 7 days and completed anthropometric measurements. Fitness was assessed using grip strength and treadmill, pull-up, and plank tests. Cross-sectional linear and logistic regression compared outcomes across levels of recess provision adjusting for the survey's complex sampling design.

Results: Children with high provision of recess were 2.31 times more likely to meet PA guidelines according to parent report than those with no/minimal recess. Accelerometer-measured PA followed a more U-shaped pattern, wherein PA was higher in children with high, compared to low, recess provision but comparable to those with no/minimal recess provision. There were no associations with weight status, adiposity, or fitness.

Conclusion: Current recess recommendations (20 min·d-1) may be insufficient as 30 minutes per day of recess was associated with a 2-fold greater likelihood of achieving recommended PA levels. Additional research on recess quantity and quality is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Exercise Science
Pediatric Exercise Science 医学-生理学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Exercise Science is a journal committed to enriching the scientific knowledge of exercise during childhood and adolescence. To this end it publishes information that contributes to an understanding of (a) the unique aspects of the physiologic, physical, biochemical, and psychologic responses of children to exercise, (b) the role of exercise in the treatment of pediatric chronic diseases, (c) the importance of physical activity in the prevention of illness and preservation of wellness, and (d) the means by which participation in sports may be made safer and more enjoyable for children and youth. Consideration will be given for publication of work by various methodologies consistent with the scientific approach. Besides original research, the journal includes review articles, abstracts from other journals, book reviews, and editorial comments. Pediatric Exercise Science encourages the expression of conflicting opinions regarding children and exercise by providing a forum for alternative viewpoints. At the same time it serves as a means of accumulating a base of research information that will allow application of experimental data to clinical practice. The scientific disciplines contributing to this body of knowledge are diverse. Therefore it is the purpose of this journal to provide a common focus for disseminating advances in the science of exercise during childhood. In doing so, the journal allows the opportunity for cross-fertilization of ideas between disciplines that will potentiate the growth of knowledge in this field. Pediatric Exercise Science seeks to stimulate new ideas regarding exercise in children and to increase the awareness of scientists, health care providers, and physical educators of the importance of exercise during childhood.
期刊最新文献
A Fundamental Movement Skill Test for Preschool Children With and Without Overweight: The SALTO Test Battery. A Note on "Response to: Methodological Rigor in Reference Chart Development: A Comment on 'Normative Reference Centiles for Sprint Performance in High-Level Youth Soccer Players: The Need To Consider Biological Maturity'". Does Physical Exercise Improve Resting Autonomic Cardiac Modulation in Overweight and Obese Children and Adolescents? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Effects of Short- Versus Long-Distance Repeated-Sprint Ability Training on Physical Performance in Youth Male Soccer Players. Surveillance of Youth Sports Participation in the United States: Strengths, Limitations, and Future Directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1