超声在植入式医疗器械通信中能做什么和不能做什么

IF 17.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2021-03-13 DOI:10.1109/RBME.2021.3080087
Banafsaj Jaafar;Jeff Neasham;Patrick Degenaar
{"title":"超声在植入式医疗器械通信中能做什么和不能做什么","authors":"Banafsaj Jaafar;Jeff Neasham;Patrick Degenaar","doi":"10.1109/RBME.2021.3080087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern Active Medical Implantable Devices require communications to transmit information to the outside world or other implantable sub-systems. This can include physiological data, diagnostics, and parameters to optimise the therapeutic protocol. The available options are to use optical, radiofrequency, or ultrasonic communications. However, in all cases, transmission becomes more difficult with deeper transmission through tissue. Challenges include absorption and scattering by tissue, and the need to ensure there are no undesirable heating effects. As such, this paper aims to review research progress in using ultrasound as an alternative for deep tissue communications. We provide an empirical review of the technology and communication protocols that different groups have used, as well as comparing the implications in terms of penetration depth, implant size, and data rate. We conclude that this technique has promise for deeper implants and for intrabody communications between implantable devices (intrabody networks).","PeriodicalId":39235,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":17.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/RBME.2021.3080087","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Ultrasound Can and Cannot Do in Implantable Medical Device Communications\",\"authors\":\"Banafsaj Jaafar;Jeff Neasham;Patrick Degenaar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RBME.2021.3080087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Modern Active Medical Implantable Devices require communications to transmit information to the outside world or other implantable sub-systems. This can include physiological data, diagnostics, and parameters to optimise the therapeutic protocol. The available options are to use optical, radiofrequency, or ultrasonic communications. However, in all cases, transmission becomes more difficult with deeper transmission through tissue. Challenges include absorption and scattering by tissue, and the need to ensure there are no undesirable heating effects. As such, this paper aims to review research progress in using ultrasound as an alternative for deep tissue communications. We provide an empirical review of the technology and communication protocols that different groups have used, as well as comparing the implications in terms of penetration depth, implant size, and data rate. We conclude that this technique has promise for deeper implants and for intrabody communications between implantable devices (intrabody networks).\",\"PeriodicalId\":39235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":17.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/RBME.2021.3080087\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9430704/\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9430704/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

现代有源医疗植入式设备需要通信来将信息传输到外部世界或其他植入式子系统。这可以包括生理数据、诊断和参数,以优化治疗方案。可用的选择是使用光学、射频或超声波通信。然而,在所有情况下,通过组织进行更深层次的传播会变得更加困难。挑战包括被组织吸收和散射,以及需要确保没有不希望的加热效应。因此,本文旨在回顾使用超声波作为深层组织通信替代方案的研究进展。我们对不同群体使用的技术和通信协议进行了实证审查,并比较了其在穿透深度、植入物大小和数据速率方面的影响。我们得出的结论是,这项技术有望用于更深层次的植入和可植入设备之间的体内通信(体内网络)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What Ultrasound Can and Cannot Do in Implantable Medical Device Communications
Modern Active Medical Implantable Devices require communications to transmit information to the outside world or other implantable sub-systems. This can include physiological data, diagnostics, and parameters to optimise the therapeutic protocol. The available options are to use optical, radiofrequency, or ultrasonic communications. However, in all cases, transmission becomes more difficult with deeper transmission through tissue. Challenges include absorption and scattering by tissue, and the need to ensure there are no undesirable heating effects. As such, this paper aims to review research progress in using ultrasound as an alternative for deep tissue communications. We provide an empirical review of the technology and communication protocols that different groups have used, as well as comparing the implications in terms of penetration depth, implant size, and data rate. We conclude that this technique has promise for deeper implants and for intrabody communications between implantable devices (intrabody networks).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering
IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
31.70
自引率
0.60%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering (RBME) serves as a platform to review the state-of-the-art and trends in the interdisciplinary field of biomedical engineering, which encompasses engineering, life sciences, and medicine. The journal aims to consolidate research and reviews for members of all IEEE societies interested in biomedical engineering. Recognizing the demand for comprehensive reviews among authors of various IEEE journals, RBME addresses this need by receiving, reviewing, and publishing scholarly works under one umbrella. It covers a broad spectrum, from historical to modern developments in biomedical engineering and the integration of technologies from various IEEE societies into the life sciences and medicine.
期刊最新文献
A Survey of Few-Shot Learning for Biomedical Time Series. The Physiome Project and Digital Twins. Solving the Inverse Problem of Electrocardiography for Cardiac Digital Twins: A Survey. Data- and Physics-driven Deep Learning Based Reconstruction for Fast MRI: Fundamentals and Methodologies. Exhaled Breath Analysis: from Laboratory Test to Wearable Sensing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1