奥卡姆剃刀和院前文档:当更简单的解决方案导致更好的文档。

Lance E Nissley, Ramiro Rodriguez, Michael D April, Steven G Schauer, Gregory J Stevens
{"title":"奥卡姆剃刀和院前文档:当更简单的解决方案导致更好的文档。","authors":"Lance E Nissley,&nbsp;Ramiro Rodriguez,&nbsp;Michael D April,&nbsp;Steven G Schauer,&nbsp;Gregory J Stevens","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) card has undergone several changes since its first introduction in 1996. In 2013, updates to the card included more data points to increase prehospital documentation quality and enable performance improvement. This study reviews the proportions of data collected before and after the implementation of the new TCCC card.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of a previously described dataset from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) focused on prehospital medical care. In this sub-analysis, we defined the pre-implementation period as 2009-2013 followed by a 1-year run-in with the post-implementation period as 2015-2019. Our primary outcome was documentation of a pulse rate and our secondary outcomes included documentation of other vital signs. We used multivariable logistic regression models to adjust for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 18,182 encounters that met inclusion for this analysis-14,711 before and 3,471 after the update. Across all vital signs, there was a peak around 2012-2013 with a drop noted in 2015. Comparing the preimplementation and post-implementation groups, there were higher proportions with documentation of a pulse rate (62% versus 49%), respirations (51% versus 45%), systolic pressure (53% versus 46%), diastolic pressure (49% versus 41%), oxygen saturation (55% versus 46%), and pain score (27% versus 19%, all p is less than 0.001) in the pre-implementation group. When adjusting for injury severity score (ISS), casualty category, and year of injury, the odds ratio of documentation of a pulse after implementation was 0.01 (95% CI: 0.00-0.01). When adjusting for ISS and casualty category, the odds ratio was 0.64 (95% CI: 0.60-0.70). When adjusting for ISS only, the odds ratio was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.54-0.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of the new TCCC card resulted in overall lower documentation proportions which persisted after adjusting for measurable confounders.</p>","PeriodicalId":74148,"journal":{"name":"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occam's Razor and Prehospital Documentation: When the Simpler Solution Resulted in Better Documentation.\",\"authors\":\"Lance E Nissley,&nbsp;Ramiro Rodriguez,&nbsp;Michael D April,&nbsp;Steven G Schauer,&nbsp;Gregory J Stevens\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) card has undergone several changes since its first introduction in 1996. In 2013, updates to the card included more data points to increase prehospital documentation quality and enable performance improvement. This study reviews the proportions of data collected before and after the implementation of the new TCCC card.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of a previously described dataset from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) focused on prehospital medical care. In this sub-analysis, we defined the pre-implementation period as 2009-2013 followed by a 1-year run-in with the post-implementation period as 2015-2019. Our primary outcome was documentation of a pulse rate and our secondary outcomes included documentation of other vital signs. We used multivariable logistic regression models to adjust for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 18,182 encounters that met inclusion for this analysis-14,711 before and 3,471 after the update. Across all vital signs, there was a peak around 2012-2013 with a drop noted in 2015. Comparing the preimplementation and post-implementation groups, there were higher proportions with documentation of a pulse rate (62% versus 49%), respirations (51% versus 45%), systolic pressure (53% versus 46%), diastolic pressure (49% versus 41%), oxygen saturation (55% versus 46%), and pain score (27% versus 19%, all p is less than 0.001) in the pre-implementation group. When adjusting for injury severity score (ISS), casualty category, and year of injury, the odds ratio of documentation of a pulse after implementation was 0.01 (95% CI: 0.00-0.01). When adjusting for ISS and casualty category, the odds ratio was 0.64 (95% CI: 0.60-0.70). When adjusting for ISS only, the odds ratio was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.54-0.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of the new TCCC card resulted in overall lower documentation proportions which persisted after adjusting for measurable confounders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:战术战斗伤亡护理(TCCC)卡自1996年首次推出以来已经经历了几次变化。2013年,该卡的更新包括了更多的数据点,以提高院前文件的质量,并使性能得到改善。本研究回顾了新TCCC卡实施前后收集数据的比例。方法:这是对先前描述的国防部创伤登记处(DODTR)集中在院前医疗保健的数据集的二次分析。在本子分析中,我们将实施前的时期定义为2009-2013年,随后是1年的磨合期,实施后的时期为2015-2019年。我们的主要结局是记录脉搏率,次要结局包括记录其他生命体征。我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型来调整混杂因素。结果:有18182次遭遇符合本分析的纳入-更新之前有14711次,更新之后有3471次。在所有生命体征中,2012-2013年左右出现峰值,2015年出现下降。与实施前组和实施后组相比,实施前组记录脉率(62%对49%)、呼吸(51%对45%)、收缩压(53%对46%)、舒张压(49%对41%)、血氧饱和度(55%对46%)和疼痛评分(27%对19%,p均小于0.001)的比例更高。当调整损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、伤亡类别和受伤年份时,实施后记录脉搏的优势比为0.01 (95% CI: 0.00-0.01)。调整ISS和伤亡类别后,优势比为0.64 (95% CI: 0.60-0.70)。当仅调整ISS时,优势比为0.58 (95% CI: 0.54-0.63)。结论:新的TCCC卡的实施导致总体上较低的文件比例,在调整可测量的混杂因素后持续存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Occam's Razor and Prehospital Documentation: When the Simpler Solution Resulted in Better Documentation.

Introduction: The Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) card has undergone several changes since its first introduction in 1996. In 2013, updates to the card included more data points to increase prehospital documentation quality and enable performance improvement. This study reviews the proportions of data collected before and after the implementation of the new TCCC card.

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a previously described dataset from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) focused on prehospital medical care. In this sub-analysis, we defined the pre-implementation period as 2009-2013 followed by a 1-year run-in with the post-implementation period as 2015-2019. Our primary outcome was documentation of a pulse rate and our secondary outcomes included documentation of other vital signs. We used multivariable logistic regression models to adjust for confounders.

Results: There were 18,182 encounters that met inclusion for this analysis-14,711 before and 3,471 after the update. Across all vital signs, there was a peak around 2012-2013 with a drop noted in 2015. Comparing the preimplementation and post-implementation groups, there were higher proportions with documentation of a pulse rate (62% versus 49%), respirations (51% versus 45%), systolic pressure (53% versus 46%), diastolic pressure (49% versus 41%), oxygen saturation (55% versus 46%), and pain score (27% versus 19%, all p is less than 0.001) in the pre-implementation group. When adjusting for injury severity score (ISS), casualty category, and year of injury, the odds ratio of documentation of a pulse after implementation was 0.01 (95% CI: 0.00-0.01). When adjusting for ISS and casualty category, the odds ratio was 0.64 (95% CI: 0.60-0.70). When adjusting for ISS only, the odds ratio was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.54-0.63).

Conclusions: Implementation of the new TCCC card resulted in overall lower documentation proportions which persisted after adjusting for measurable confounders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Closing the Trauma and Critical Care Gap: A Paradigm Shift through Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality. MRI Predictive Model's Utility in a Recruit Training Environment for Tibia Stress Fractures. Platelet-Rich Plasma Improves Strength and Speed of Recovery in an Active-Duty Soldier with Isolated Injury to the Lateral Collateral Ligament of the Knee: A Case Report. The Continued Misadventures of Intentional C4 Ingestion: A Case Cluster. Impact of a Novel Biplane User Interface on Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Access Performance: A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1