临床催眠的当前实践、经验和观点:一项国际调查的结果。

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis Pub Date : 2023-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-13 DOI:10.1080/00207144.2023.2183862
Olafur S Palsson, Zoltan Kekecs, Giuseppe De Benedittis, Donald Moss, Gary R Elkins, Devin B Terhune, Katalin Varga, Philip D Shenefelt, Peter J Whorwell
{"title":"临床催眠的当前实践、经验和观点:一项国际调查的结果。","authors":"Olafur S Palsson,&nbsp;Zoltan Kekecs,&nbsp;Giuseppe De Benedittis,&nbsp;Donald Moss,&nbsp;Gary R Elkins,&nbsp;Devin B Terhune,&nbsp;Katalin Varga,&nbsp;Philip D Shenefelt,&nbsp;Peter J Whorwell","doi":"10.1080/00207144.2023.2183862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An online survey of 691 clinicians who use hypnosis was conducted in 31 countries to gain a broad real-world picture of current practices, views, and experiences in clinical hypnosis. Among 36 common clinical uses, stress reduction, wellbeing and self-esteem-enhancement, surgery preparations, anxiety interventions, mindfulness facilitation, and labor and childbirth applications were the most frequently rated as highly effective (each by ≥70% of raters) in the clinicians' own experience. Adverse hypnosis-associated effects had been encountered by 55% of clinicians but were generally short-lived and very rarely judged as serious. The most common hypnosis approaches used were Ericksonian (71%), hypnotic relaxation therapy (55%), and traditional hypnosis (50%). Almost all respondents reported regularly using other therapeutic modalities alongside hypnosis. Among a range of client variables potentially affecting therapy, most clinicians rated hypnotist-client rapport (88%) and client motivation (75%) as very or extremely important factors for successful hypnotherapy. The majority of respondents had conducted hypnosis treatment via teletherapy, and 54% of those estimated it to be as effective as in-person treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13896,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Practices, Experiences, and Views in Clinical Hypnosis: Findings of an International Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Olafur S Palsson,&nbsp;Zoltan Kekecs,&nbsp;Giuseppe De Benedittis,&nbsp;Donald Moss,&nbsp;Gary R Elkins,&nbsp;Devin B Terhune,&nbsp;Katalin Varga,&nbsp;Philip D Shenefelt,&nbsp;Peter J Whorwell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00207144.2023.2183862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An online survey of 691 clinicians who use hypnosis was conducted in 31 countries to gain a broad real-world picture of current practices, views, and experiences in clinical hypnosis. Among 36 common clinical uses, stress reduction, wellbeing and self-esteem-enhancement, surgery preparations, anxiety interventions, mindfulness facilitation, and labor and childbirth applications were the most frequently rated as highly effective (each by ≥70% of raters) in the clinicians' own experience. Adverse hypnosis-associated effects had been encountered by 55% of clinicians but were generally short-lived and very rarely judged as serious. The most common hypnosis approaches used were Ericksonian (71%), hypnotic relaxation therapy (55%), and traditional hypnosis (50%). Almost all respondents reported regularly using other therapeutic modalities alongside hypnosis. Among a range of client variables potentially affecting therapy, most clinicians rated hypnotist-client rapport (88%) and client motivation (75%) as very or extremely important factors for successful hypnotherapy. The majority of respondents had conducted hypnosis treatment via teletherapy, and 54% of those estimated it to be as effective as in-person treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2023.2183862\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2023.2183862","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

一项针对31个国家691名使用催眠的临床医生的在线调查旨在了解临床催眠的当前实践、观点和经验。在36种常见的临床应用中,根据临床医生自己的经验,减压、增强幸福感和自尊、手术准备、焦虑干预、正念促进以及分娩和分娩应用最常被评为高效(每种都有≥70%的评分者)。55%的临床医生曾遇到过与催眠相关的不良反应,但通常是短暂的,很少被判断为严重。最常见的催眠方法是埃里克森(71%)、催眠放松疗法(55%)和传统催眠(50%)。几乎所有受访者都报告说,除了催眠之外,他们还经常使用其他治疗方式。在一系列可能影响治疗的客户变量中,大多数临床医生将催眠师-客户关系(88%)和客户动机(75%)评为成功催眠治疗的非常或极其重要的因素。大多数受访者通过远程治疗进行了催眠治疗,54%的受访者认为这与亲自治疗一样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Current Practices, Experiences, and Views in Clinical Hypnosis: Findings of an International Survey.

An online survey of 691 clinicians who use hypnosis was conducted in 31 countries to gain a broad real-world picture of current practices, views, and experiences in clinical hypnosis. Among 36 common clinical uses, stress reduction, wellbeing and self-esteem-enhancement, surgery preparations, anxiety interventions, mindfulness facilitation, and labor and childbirth applications were the most frequently rated as highly effective (each by ≥70% of raters) in the clinicians' own experience. Adverse hypnosis-associated effects had been encountered by 55% of clinicians but were generally short-lived and very rarely judged as serious. The most common hypnosis approaches used were Ericksonian (71%), hypnotic relaxation therapy (55%), and traditional hypnosis (50%). Almost all respondents reported regularly using other therapeutic modalities alongside hypnosis. Among a range of client variables potentially affecting therapy, most clinicians rated hypnotist-client rapport (88%) and client motivation (75%) as very or extremely important factors for successful hypnotherapy. The majority of respondents had conducted hypnosis treatment via teletherapy, and 54% of those estimated it to be as effective as in-person treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
29.40%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The IJCEH will keep you up to date on the latest clinical and research findings in the field, thanks to leading scholars from around the world examining such topics as: •Hypnotherapeutic Techniques •Pain and Anxiety Relief •Disociative Identity Disorder (Multiple Personality Disorder) •Altered States of Consciousness •Delayed Recall •Dissociation •Forensic Uses of Hypnosis •Hypnosis in Eyewitness Memory •Hypnotic Induction in Dentistry •Hypnotizability •Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder •Self-Hypnosis •Control of Smoking •Weight Management •Ego State Hypnotherapy •Theories of Hypnosis •Physiological & Psychological Bases of Hypnosis
期刊最新文献
A General Factor of Hypnotizability Revealed by Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS), Hypnosis, and Hypnotizability: Literature Review and Future Directions. A Multicomponent Cognitive-Behavioral Hypnotic Approach for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Treatment: A Case Study. Power of a Few Vagrant Words: Effects of Direct and Indirect Suggestions for Self-Representation in Art-Based Online Interventions. Utilizing Involuntary Unfolding Phenomena as Catalyst for Adaptive Responsiveness and Reorganization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1