接受门诊姑息治疗的癌症患者的照顾者解决问题的维度。

IF 1.6 Q2 SOCIAL WORK Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-27 DOI:10.1080/15524256.2022.2139333
Adrian E Bruton, Lindsey R Debosik, Kyle A Pitzer, Ellen L Csikai, Karla T Washington
{"title":"接受门诊姑息治疗的癌症患者的照顾者解决问题的维度。","authors":"Adrian E Bruton, Lindsey R Debosik, Kyle A Pitzer, Ellen L Csikai, Karla T Washington","doi":"10.1080/15524256.2022.2139333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Family caregivers of people with cancer encounter a wide range of problems including challenges managing patients' symptoms, difficulties navigating complex healthcare systems, and financial stressors associated with caregiving. Outpatient palliative care teams are ideally positioned to help caregivers respond to these challenges; however, little evidence is available to inform problem-solving support for caregivers in this setting. This article presents results from a secondary analysis of data obtained as part of a randomized clinical trial of a problem-solving intervention for family caregivers of people with cancer receiving outpatient palliative care. It describes the extent to which caregivers report adoption of positive and negative problem orientations and use of rational, impulsive, and avoidant problem-solving styles, and examines whether these problem-solving dimensions differ by age and gender. Results reveal statistically significant negative correlations between caregiver age and positive and negative problem orientations and use of a rational problem-solving style, and statistically significant gender differences with regard to negative problem orientation and use of an impulsive problem-solving style. Findings from this exploratory study highlight unique potential strengths and needs of caregivers, and set the stage for future research on problem-solving among cancer caregivers in the growing field of outpatient palliative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":45992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care","volume":"19 1","pages":"23-32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9998336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problem-Solving Dimensions among Caregivers of People with Cancer Receiving Outpatient Palliative Care.\",\"authors\":\"Adrian E Bruton, Lindsey R Debosik, Kyle A Pitzer, Ellen L Csikai, Karla T Washington\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15524256.2022.2139333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Family caregivers of people with cancer encounter a wide range of problems including challenges managing patients' symptoms, difficulties navigating complex healthcare systems, and financial stressors associated with caregiving. Outpatient palliative care teams are ideally positioned to help caregivers respond to these challenges; however, little evidence is available to inform problem-solving support for caregivers in this setting. This article presents results from a secondary analysis of data obtained as part of a randomized clinical trial of a problem-solving intervention for family caregivers of people with cancer receiving outpatient palliative care. It describes the extent to which caregivers report adoption of positive and negative problem orientations and use of rational, impulsive, and avoidant problem-solving styles, and examines whether these problem-solving dimensions differ by age and gender. Results reveal statistically significant negative correlations between caregiver age and positive and negative problem orientations and use of a rational problem-solving style, and statistically significant gender differences with regard to negative problem orientation and use of an impulsive problem-solving style. Findings from this exploratory study highlight unique potential strengths and needs of caregivers, and set the stage for future research on problem-solving among cancer caregivers in the growing field of outpatient palliative care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"23-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9998336/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15524256.2022.2139333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15524256.2022.2139333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

癌症患者的家庭照护者会遇到各种各样的问题,包括控制患者症状的挑战、驾驭复杂医疗系统的困难以及与照护相关的经济压力。门诊姑息关怀团队处于帮助照护者应对这些挑战的理想位置;然而,目前几乎没有证据表明在这种情况下可以为照护者提供解决问题的支持。本文介绍了一项随机临床试验的数据二次分析结果,该试验针对接受门诊姑息关怀的癌症患者的家庭照护者采取了解决问题的干预措施。文章描述了照护者在多大程度上采用了积极和消极的问题导向,使用了理性、冲动和回避的问题解决方式,并研究了这些问题解决方式是否因年龄和性别而有所不同。研究结果表明,照顾者的年龄与积极和消极问题取向以及使用理性问题解决方式之间存在统计学意义上的明显负相关,而在消极问题取向和使用冲动问题解决方式方面存在统计学意义上的明显性别差异。这项探索性研究的结果凸显了护理人员独特的潜在优势和需求,为今后在不断发展的门诊姑息治疗领域开展有关癌症护理人员解决问题的研究奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Problem-Solving Dimensions among Caregivers of People with Cancer Receiving Outpatient Palliative Care.

Family caregivers of people with cancer encounter a wide range of problems including challenges managing patients' symptoms, difficulties navigating complex healthcare systems, and financial stressors associated with caregiving. Outpatient palliative care teams are ideally positioned to help caregivers respond to these challenges; however, little evidence is available to inform problem-solving support for caregivers in this setting. This article presents results from a secondary analysis of data obtained as part of a randomized clinical trial of a problem-solving intervention for family caregivers of people with cancer receiving outpatient palliative care. It describes the extent to which caregivers report adoption of positive and negative problem orientations and use of rational, impulsive, and avoidant problem-solving styles, and examines whether these problem-solving dimensions differ by age and gender. Results reveal statistically significant negative correlations between caregiver age and positive and negative problem orientations and use of a rational problem-solving style, and statistically significant gender differences with regard to negative problem orientation and use of an impulsive problem-solving style. Findings from this exploratory study highlight unique potential strengths and needs of caregivers, and set the stage for future research on problem-solving among cancer caregivers in the growing field of outpatient palliative care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care, now affiliated with the Social Work in Hospice and Palliative Care Network, explores issues crucial to caring for terminally ill patients and their families. Academics and social work practitioners present current research, articles, and continuing features on the "state of the art" of social work practice, including interdisciplinary interventions, practice innovations, practice evaluations, end-of-life decision-making, grief and bereavement, and ethical and moral issues. The Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care combines theory and practice to facilitate an understanding of the multi-level issues surrounding care for those in pain and suffering from painful, debilitating, and/or terminal illness.
期刊最新文献
A Phenomenological Study of Clinical Stillbirth Management for Grieving Mothers. How Tangible is an Advance Care Planning Document in Reality? Still Ship at Sea. Disbelief, Distress, & Distrust: Trending Institution Related Emotional Distress During COVID-19. Always Politically Correct: Supporting Seriously Ill Older Populations and Their Families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1