选定的血液学摘要。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Phlebology Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1177/02683555231170492
Lowell S Kabnick Md, Katheen Ozsvath Md, Jorge H Ulloa Md
{"title":"选定的血液学摘要。","authors":"Lowell S Kabnick Md, Katheen Ozsvath Md, Jorge H Ulloa Md","doi":"10.1177/02683555231170492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors investigated different laser fi ber tip con fi gurations to outcomes regarding technical success and incidence of complications. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with documented great saphenous vein (GSV) re fl ux from 2020 to 2022, comparing baseline parameters and outcome between 2 groups of laser tip fi bers used; radial tip and jacketed tip. The primary endpoint was technical success. Secondary endpoints included incidence of complications in each group, and venous clinical severity score (VCSS) difference in both groups. Inclusion criteria entailed patients with primary varicose veins over the age of 18 years, free from malignancy, hematological disorders, and having documented GSV re fl ux of more than 0.5 seconds. All patients had endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the GSV, with comple-mentary foam sclerotherapy or ambulatory phlebectomies as required. A total of 74 patients underwent EVLA (85 limbs). 54 limbs utilized the radial laser fi bers, and the remaining utilized jacketed fi bers. Technical success was achieved in 92.9%; 6 limbs (7.1%) had recanalization of the proximal 3 cm GSV at 1 month; 2 patients experienced hematomas; and 5 patients had super fi cial vein thrombosis. There was no signi fi cant association between postoperative pain, bruising, recanalization, hematoma","PeriodicalId":20139,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":"38 4","pages":"291-294"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selected phlebological abstracts.\",\"authors\":\"Lowell S Kabnick Md, Katheen Ozsvath Md, Jorge H Ulloa Md\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02683555231170492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors investigated different laser fi ber tip con fi gurations to outcomes regarding technical success and incidence of complications. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with documented great saphenous vein (GSV) re fl ux from 2020 to 2022, comparing baseline parameters and outcome between 2 groups of laser tip fi bers used; radial tip and jacketed tip. The primary endpoint was technical success. Secondary endpoints included incidence of complications in each group, and venous clinical severity score (VCSS) difference in both groups. Inclusion criteria entailed patients with primary varicose veins over the age of 18 years, free from malignancy, hematological disorders, and having documented GSV re fl ux of more than 0.5 seconds. All patients had endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the GSV, with comple-mentary foam sclerotherapy or ambulatory phlebectomies as required. A total of 74 patients underwent EVLA (85 limbs). 54 limbs utilized the radial laser fi bers, and the remaining utilized jacketed fi bers. Technical success was achieved in 92.9%; 6 limbs (7.1%) had recanalization of the proximal 3 cm GSV at 1 month; 2 patients experienced hematomas; and 5 patients had super fi cial vein thrombosis. There was no signi fi cant association between postoperative pain, bruising, recanalization, hematoma\",\"PeriodicalId\":20139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phlebology\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"291-294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phlebology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555231170492\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555231170492","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Selected phlebological abstracts.
The authors investigated different laser fi ber tip con fi gurations to outcomes regarding technical success and incidence of complications. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with documented great saphenous vein (GSV) re fl ux from 2020 to 2022, comparing baseline parameters and outcome between 2 groups of laser tip fi bers used; radial tip and jacketed tip. The primary endpoint was technical success. Secondary endpoints included incidence of complications in each group, and venous clinical severity score (VCSS) difference in both groups. Inclusion criteria entailed patients with primary varicose veins over the age of 18 years, free from malignancy, hematological disorders, and having documented GSV re fl ux of more than 0.5 seconds. All patients had endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the GSV, with comple-mentary foam sclerotherapy or ambulatory phlebectomies as required. A total of 74 patients underwent EVLA (85 limbs). 54 limbs utilized the radial laser fi bers, and the remaining utilized jacketed fi bers. Technical success was achieved in 92.9%; 6 limbs (7.1%) had recanalization of the proximal 3 cm GSV at 1 month; 2 patients experienced hematomas; and 5 patients had super fi cial vein thrombosis. There was no signi fi cant association between postoperative pain, bruising, recanalization, hematoma
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Phlebology
Phlebology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
84
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The leading scientific journal devoted entirely to venous disease, Phlebology is the official journal of several international societies devoted to the subject. It publishes the results of high quality studies and reviews on any factor that may influence the outcome of patients with venous disease. This journal provides authoritative information about all aspects of diseases of the veins including up to the minute reviews, original articles, and short reports on the latest treatment procedures and patient outcomes to help medical practitioners, allied health professionals and scientists stay up-to-date on developments. Print ISSN: 0268-3555
期刊最新文献
Implementation of a varicose vein module added to Swedvasc, the Swedish National Registry for vascular surgery. Long-term results and predictors of failure after mechanochemical endovenous ablation in the treatment of primary great saphenous vein incompetence. Durability and efficacy of the ELVeS® Radial® 2ring slim fiber for multiple ablations. Punch grafting for the treatment of ulcerated atrophie blanche. Pigmentation of lower limbs: Contribution of haemosiderin and melanin in chronic venous insufficiency and related disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1