基于最小贝叶斯因子的激活似然估计阈值。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Neuroinformatics Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1007/s12021-023-09626-6
Tommaso Costa, Donato Liloia, Franco Cauda, Peter T Fox, Francesca Dalla Mutta, Sergio Duca, Jordi Manuello
{"title":"基于最小贝叶斯因子的激活似然估计阈值。","authors":"Tommaso Costa,&nbsp;Donato Liloia,&nbsp;Franco Cauda,&nbsp;Peter T Fox,&nbsp;Francesca Dalla Mutta,&nbsp;Sergio Duca,&nbsp;Jordi Manuello","doi":"10.1007/s12021-023-09626-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Activation likelihood estimation (ALE) is among the most used algorithms to perform neuroimaging meta-analysis. Since its first implementation, several thresholding procedures had been proposed, all referred to the frequentist framework, returning a rejection criterion for the null hypothesis according to the critical p-value selected. However, this is not informative in terms of probabilities of the validity of the hypotheses. Here, we describe an innovative thresholding procedure based on the concept of minimum Bayes factor (mBF). The use of the Bayesian framework allows to consider different levels of probability, each of these being equally significant. In order to simplify the translation between the common ALE practice and the proposed approach, we analised six task-fMRI/VBM datasets and determined the mBF values equivalent to the currently recommended frequentist thresholds based on Family Wise Error (FWE). Sensitivity and robustness toward spurious findings were also analyzed. Results showed that the cutoff log<sub>10</sub>(mBF) = 5 is equivalent to the FWE threshold, often referred as voxel-level threshold, while the cutoff log<sub>10</sub>(mBF) = 2 is equivalent to the cluster-level FWE (c-FWE) threshold. However, only in the latter case voxels spatially far from the blobs of effect in the c-FWE ALE map survived. Therefore, when using the Bayesian thresholding the cutoff log<sub>10</sub>(mBF) = 5 should be preferred. However, being in the Bayesian framework, lower values are all equally significant, while suggesting weaker level of force for that hypothesis. Hence, results obtained through less conservative thresholds can be legitimately discussed without losing statistical rigor. The proposed technique adds therefore a powerful tool to the human-brain-mapping field.</p>","PeriodicalId":49761,"journal":{"name":"Neuroinformatics","volume":"21 2","pages":"365-374"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10085951/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Minimum Bayes Factor Based Threshold for Activation Likelihood Estimation.\",\"authors\":\"Tommaso Costa,&nbsp;Donato Liloia,&nbsp;Franco Cauda,&nbsp;Peter T Fox,&nbsp;Francesca Dalla Mutta,&nbsp;Sergio Duca,&nbsp;Jordi Manuello\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12021-023-09626-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Activation likelihood estimation (ALE) is among the most used algorithms to perform neuroimaging meta-analysis. Since its first implementation, several thresholding procedures had been proposed, all referred to the frequentist framework, returning a rejection criterion for the null hypothesis according to the critical p-value selected. However, this is not informative in terms of probabilities of the validity of the hypotheses. Here, we describe an innovative thresholding procedure based on the concept of minimum Bayes factor (mBF). The use of the Bayesian framework allows to consider different levels of probability, each of these being equally significant. In order to simplify the translation between the common ALE practice and the proposed approach, we analised six task-fMRI/VBM datasets and determined the mBF values equivalent to the currently recommended frequentist thresholds based on Family Wise Error (FWE). Sensitivity and robustness toward spurious findings were also analyzed. Results showed that the cutoff log<sub>10</sub>(mBF) = 5 is equivalent to the FWE threshold, often referred as voxel-level threshold, while the cutoff log<sub>10</sub>(mBF) = 2 is equivalent to the cluster-level FWE (c-FWE) threshold. However, only in the latter case voxels spatially far from the blobs of effect in the c-FWE ALE map survived. Therefore, when using the Bayesian thresholding the cutoff log<sub>10</sub>(mBF) = 5 should be preferred. However, being in the Bayesian framework, lower values are all equally significant, while suggesting weaker level of force for that hypothesis. Hence, results obtained through less conservative thresholds can be legitimately discussed without losing statistical rigor. The proposed technique adds therefore a powerful tool to the human-brain-mapping field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroinformatics\",\"volume\":\"21 2\",\"pages\":\"365-374\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10085951/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-023-09626-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-023-09626-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

激活似然估计(ALE)是进行神经影像学荟萃分析最常用的算法之一。自第一次实施以来,已经提出了几种阈值设定程序,所有这些程序都参考了频率主义框架,根据所选的临界p值返回零假设的拒绝标准。然而,就假设有效性的概率而言,这并不能提供信息。在这里,我们描述了一种基于最小贝叶斯因子(mBF)概念的创新阈值处理方法。贝叶斯框架的使用允许考虑不同级别的概率,每个级别都是同等重要的。为了简化常见ALE实践和建议方法之间的转换,我们分析了六个任务- fmri /VBM数据集,并确定了与当前基于家庭明智误差(FWE)推荐的频率阈值等效的mBF值。对虚假结果的敏感性和稳健性也进行了分析。结果表明,截断log10(mBF) = 5相当于FWE阈值,通常称为体素级阈值,而截断log10(mBF) = 2相当于簇级FWE (c-FWE)阈值。然而,只有在后一种情况下,空间上远离c-FWE ALE图中斑点效应的体素才能存活。因此,在使用贝叶斯阈值时,应该优先选择截断log10(mBF) = 5。然而,在贝叶斯框架中,较低的值同样重要,同时表明该假设的力量水平较弱。因此,通过不太保守的阈值获得的结果可以合理地讨论,而不会失去统计严谨性。因此,提出的技术为人类大脑测绘领域增加了一个强大的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Minimum Bayes Factor Based Threshold for Activation Likelihood Estimation.

Activation likelihood estimation (ALE) is among the most used algorithms to perform neuroimaging meta-analysis. Since its first implementation, several thresholding procedures had been proposed, all referred to the frequentist framework, returning a rejection criterion for the null hypothesis according to the critical p-value selected. However, this is not informative in terms of probabilities of the validity of the hypotheses. Here, we describe an innovative thresholding procedure based on the concept of minimum Bayes factor (mBF). The use of the Bayesian framework allows to consider different levels of probability, each of these being equally significant. In order to simplify the translation between the common ALE practice and the proposed approach, we analised six task-fMRI/VBM datasets and determined the mBF values equivalent to the currently recommended frequentist thresholds based on Family Wise Error (FWE). Sensitivity and robustness toward spurious findings were also analyzed. Results showed that the cutoff log10(mBF) = 5 is equivalent to the FWE threshold, often referred as voxel-level threshold, while the cutoff log10(mBF) = 2 is equivalent to the cluster-level FWE (c-FWE) threshold. However, only in the latter case voxels spatially far from the blobs of effect in the c-FWE ALE map survived. Therefore, when using the Bayesian thresholding the cutoff log10(mBF) = 5 should be preferred. However, being in the Bayesian framework, lower values are all equally significant, while suggesting weaker level of force for that hypothesis. Hence, results obtained through less conservative thresholds can be legitimately discussed without losing statistical rigor. The proposed technique adds therefore a powerful tool to the human-brain-mapping field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroinformatics
Neuroinformatics 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Neuroinformatics publishes original articles and reviews with an emphasis on data structure and software tools related to analysis, modeling, integration, and sharing in all areas of neuroscience research. The editors particularly invite contributions on: (1) Theory and methodology, including discussions on ontologies, modeling approaches, database design, and meta-analyses; (2) Descriptions of developed databases and software tools, and of the methods for their distribution; (3) Relevant experimental results, such as reports accompanie by the release of massive data sets; (4) Computational simulations of models integrating and organizing complex data; and (5) Neuroengineering approaches, including hardware, robotics, and information theory studies.
期刊最新文献
Teaching Research Data Management with DataLad: A Multi-year, Multi-domain Effort. Hands-On Neuroinformatics Education at the Crossroads of Online and In-Person: Lessons Learned from NeuroHackademy. Utilizing fMRI to Guide TMS Targets: the Reliability and Sensitivity of fMRI Metrics at 3 T and 1.5 T. Bayesian Tensor Modeling for Image-based Classification of Alzheimer's Disease. A Bayesian Multiplex Graph Classifier of Functional Brain Connectivity Across Diverse Tasks of Cognitive Control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1