用水含漱液标本检测犬SARS-CoV-2的临床效果

IF 1.6 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of clinical virology plus Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100108
Maxime Veillette , Francine Tourangeau , Judith Fafard , Jeannot Dumaresq , Annie-Claude Labbé , G-SPIT study group
{"title":"用水含漱液标本检测犬SARS-CoV-2的临床效果","authors":"Maxime Veillette ,&nbsp;Francine Tourangeau ,&nbsp;Judith Fafard ,&nbsp;Jeannot Dumaresq ,&nbsp;Annie-Claude Labbé ,&nbsp;G-SPIT study group","doi":"10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Spring water gargle (SWG) is a suitable, non-invasive, alternative specimen for SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-PCR. This study sought to evaluate the performance of the cobas Liat point-of-care system for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in SWG samples. SWG samples and standard oral and nasopharyngeal swab (ONPS) were collected simultaneously from participants in a COVID-19 screening clinic, in November and December 2020. Both sample types were analyzed in parallel on the cobas Liat platform and with the Seegene Allplex 2019-nCoV assay. Among the 110 participants, 53% had compatible symptoms and 71% had a contact with a confirmed COVID-19 case. Only two (1.8%) individuals had neither symptoms nor contact. Amongst 110 paired samples, 25 (23%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 on the cobas Liat for a least one sample type, with a kappa coefficient of 0.92. Agreement between the cobas Liat platform and the Seegene assay was also excellent (kappa coefficient values of 0.94 and 0.95). Two SWG samples failed to provide a positive result when their ONPS pair was positive, but their cycle threshold (Ct) values were &gt;35 on the Seegene assay, reflecting a low viral load. Overall, the performance of the cobas Liat platform is excellent for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in SWG samples in a high pre-test probability population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical virology plus","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9468300/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical performance of SARS-CoV-2 detection on the cobas Liat using water gargle samples\",\"authors\":\"Maxime Veillette ,&nbsp;Francine Tourangeau ,&nbsp;Judith Fafard ,&nbsp;Jeannot Dumaresq ,&nbsp;Annie-Claude Labbé ,&nbsp;G-SPIT study group\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Spring water gargle (SWG) is a suitable, non-invasive, alternative specimen for SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-PCR. This study sought to evaluate the performance of the cobas Liat point-of-care system for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in SWG samples. SWG samples and standard oral and nasopharyngeal swab (ONPS) were collected simultaneously from participants in a COVID-19 screening clinic, in November and December 2020. Both sample types were analyzed in parallel on the cobas Liat platform and with the Seegene Allplex 2019-nCoV assay. Among the 110 participants, 53% had compatible symptoms and 71% had a contact with a confirmed COVID-19 case. Only two (1.8%) individuals had neither symptoms nor contact. Amongst 110 paired samples, 25 (23%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 on the cobas Liat for a least one sample type, with a kappa coefficient of 0.92. Agreement between the cobas Liat platform and the Seegene assay was also excellent (kappa coefficient values of 0.94 and 0.95). Two SWG samples failed to provide a positive result when their ONPS pair was positive, but their cycle threshold (Ct) values were &gt;35 on the Seegene assay, reflecting a low viral load. Overall, the performance of the cobas Liat platform is excellent for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in SWG samples in a high pre-test probability population.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical virology plus\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9468300/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical virology plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038022000473\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical virology plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038022000473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

泉水漱口水(SWG)是RT-PCR检测SARS-CoV-2的一种合适的、无创的替代标本。本研究旨在评估cobas Liat护理点系统在SWG样本中检测SARS-CoV-2的性能。于2020年11月和12月同时从COVID-19筛查诊所的参与者中收集SWG样本和标准口腔和鼻咽拭子(ONPS)。两种样品类型在cobas Liat平台和Seegene Allplex 2019-nCoV实验上并行分析。在110名参与者中,53%的人有相似的症状,71%的人与确诊的COVID-19病例有过接触。只有两个人(1.8%)既没有症状也没有接触。在110份配对样本中,至少有一种样本类型的cov -2在cobas Liat上呈阳性25份(23%),kappa系数为0.92。cobas Liat平台与Seegene法的一致性也很好(kappa系数分别为0.94和0.95)。当两个SWG样本的ONPS对呈阳性时,它们未能提供阳性结果,但在Seegene试验中,它们的周期阈值(Ct)为35,反映了低病毒载量。总体而言,cobas Liat平台在检测前概率较高的SWG样本中检测SARS-CoV-2的性能优异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical performance of SARS-CoV-2 detection on the cobas Liat using water gargle samples

Spring water gargle (SWG) is a suitable, non-invasive, alternative specimen for SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-PCR. This study sought to evaluate the performance of the cobas Liat point-of-care system for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in SWG samples. SWG samples and standard oral and nasopharyngeal swab (ONPS) were collected simultaneously from participants in a COVID-19 screening clinic, in November and December 2020. Both sample types were analyzed in parallel on the cobas Liat platform and with the Seegene Allplex 2019-nCoV assay. Among the 110 participants, 53% had compatible symptoms and 71% had a contact with a confirmed COVID-19 case. Only two (1.8%) individuals had neither symptoms nor contact. Amongst 110 paired samples, 25 (23%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 on the cobas Liat for a least one sample type, with a kappa coefficient of 0.92. Agreement between the cobas Liat platform and the Seegene assay was also excellent (kappa coefficient values of 0.94 and 0.95). Two SWG samples failed to provide a positive result when their ONPS pair was positive, but their cycle threshold (Ct) values were >35 on the Seegene assay, reflecting a low viral load. Overall, the performance of the cobas Liat platform is excellent for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in SWG samples in a high pre-test probability population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of clinical virology plus
Journal of clinical virology plus Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Performance evaluation of the Qiagen BK virus ASR on the NeuMoDx system Environmental surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 for outbreak detection in hospital: A single centre prospective study Correlation of cytokine storm with ocular fundus abnormalities in critically ill patients with severe viral pneumonia A prospective study to evaluate the clinical specificity of the cobas® MPX test kit for screening for HIV RNA, HCV RNA, and HBV DNA in blood donation samples using the cobas® 6800 system in HBV endemic areas A rapid review of the epidemiology and combating strategies of hepatitis C virus infection in Ghana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1