{"title":"中央气道狭窄患者经支气管镜多重治疗的出血风险及安全性。","authors":"Congcong Li, Yanyan Li, Faguang Jin, Liyan Bo","doi":"10.1080/17476348.2023.2201440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central airway obstruction (CAO) are common abnormality that usually needing interventional bronchoscopy, and sometimes multiple rounds of treatment. However, there were few studies explore the safety of it.</p><p><strong>Research design & methods: </strong>The records of patients who underwent interventional bronchoscopy because of CAO at Respiratory department between 1 January 2010, and 31 December 2020 were revised. The patients' clinical characteristics, information about bronchoscopy and incidence of complications were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were totally 1,482 bronchoscopy procedures conducted in the 733 CAO patients. And the incidence of major complications in the retreatment group was significantly lower than that in the first treatment group ((4.77% vs. 1.87%, χ<sup>2</sup> = 9.78, df = 1, <i>p</i> < 0.01), so did the incidence of severe bleeding (2.46% vs. 0.40%, χ<sup>2</sup> = 11.20, df = 1, <i>p</i> < 0.01). However, there was some variability between the two groups in age and anesthesia type. A short interval time, more treatment times, and general anesthesia were related to a lower incidence of hemorrhage. For patients who were previously bleeding, the incidence of hemorrhage was significantly higher than the incidence in the non-bleeding patients (42.93% vs. 16.33%, respectively; χ<sup>2</sup> = 57.54, df = 1, <i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For the patients with CAO, repeated interventional bronchoscopy treatment was safe, and it should be treated with discretion when retreat the patients once bleeding during previous therapeutic bronchoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12103,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The bleeding risk and safety of multiple treatments by bronchoscopy in patients with central airway stenosis.\",\"authors\":\"Congcong Li, Yanyan Li, Faguang Jin, Liyan Bo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17476348.2023.2201440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central airway obstruction (CAO) are common abnormality that usually needing interventional bronchoscopy, and sometimes multiple rounds of treatment. However, there were few studies explore the safety of it.</p><p><strong>Research design & methods: </strong>The records of patients who underwent interventional bronchoscopy because of CAO at Respiratory department between 1 January 2010, and 31 December 2020 were revised. The patients' clinical characteristics, information about bronchoscopy and incidence of complications were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were totally 1,482 bronchoscopy procedures conducted in the 733 CAO patients. And the incidence of major complications in the retreatment group was significantly lower than that in the first treatment group ((4.77% vs. 1.87%, χ<sup>2</sup> = 9.78, df = 1, <i>p</i> < 0.01), so did the incidence of severe bleeding (2.46% vs. 0.40%, χ<sup>2</sup> = 11.20, df = 1, <i>p</i> < 0.01). However, there was some variability between the two groups in age and anesthesia type. A short interval time, more treatment times, and general anesthesia were related to a lower incidence of hemorrhage. For patients who were previously bleeding, the incidence of hemorrhage was significantly higher than the incidence in the non-bleeding patients (42.93% vs. 16.33%, respectively; χ<sup>2</sup> = 57.54, df = 1, <i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For the patients with CAO, repeated interventional bronchoscopy treatment was safe, and it should be treated with discretion when retreat the patients once bleeding during previous therapeutic bronchoscopy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2023.2201440\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2023.2201440","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:中央气道梗阻是一种常见的异常,通常需要介入支气管镜检查,有时需要多轮治疗。然而,很少有研究探讨它的安全性。研究设计与方法:对2010年1月1日至2020年12月31日在呼吸科因CAO行介入支气管镜检查的患者记录进行修订。收集并分析患者的临床特征、支气管镜检查信息及并发症的发生情况。结果:733例曹操患者共行支气管镜检查1482例。再次治疗组主要并发症发生率显著低于首次治疗组((4.77% vs. 1.87%, χ2 = 9.78, df = 1, p 2 = 11.20, df = 1, p 2 = 57.54, df = 1, p)结论:对于曹化气患者,重复介入支气管镜治疗是安全的,患者在既往支气管镜治疗中出现出血时应慎重治疗。
The bleeding risk and safety of multiple treatments by bronchoscopy in patients with central airway stenosis.
Background: Central airway obstruction (CAO) are common abnormality that usually needing interventional bronchoscopy, and sometimes multiple rounds of treatment. However, there were few studies explore the safety of it.
Research design & methods: The records of patients who underwent interventional bronchoscopy because of CAO at Respiratory department between 1 January 2010, and 31 December 2020 were revised. The patients' clinical characteristics, information about bronchoscopy and incidence of complications were collected and analyzed.
Results: There were totally 1,482 bronchoscopy procedures conducted in the 733 CAO patients. And the incidence of major complications in the retreatment group was significantly lower than that in the first treatment group ((4.77% vs. 1.87%, χ2 = 9.78, df = 1, p < 0.01), so did the incidence of severe bleeding (2.46% vs. 0.40%, χ2 = 11.20, df = 1, p < 0.01). However, there was some variability between the two groups in age and anesthesia type. A short interval time, more treatment times, and general anesthesia were related to a lower incidence of hemorrhage. For patients who were previously bleeding, the incidence of hemorrhage was significantly higher than the incidence in the non-bleeding patients (42.93% vs. 16.33%, respectively; χ2 = 57.54, df = 1, p < 0.01).
Conclusion: For the patients with CAO, repeated interventional bronchoscopy treatment was safe, and it should be treated with discretion when retreat the patients once bleeding during previous therapeutic bronchoscopy.
期刊介绍:
Coverage will include the following key areas:
- Prospects for new and emerging therapeutics
- Epidemiology of disease
- Preventive strategies
- All aspects of COPD, from patient self-management to systemic effects of the disease and comorbidities
- Improved diagnostic methods, including imaging techniques, biomarkers and physiological tests.
- Advances in the treatment of respiratory infections and drug resistance issues
- Occupational and environmental factors
- Progress in smoking intervention and cessation methods
- Disease and treatment issues for defined populations, such as children and the elderly
- Respiratory intensive and critical care
- Updates on the status and advances of specific disease areas, including asthma, HIV/AIDS-related disease, cystic fibrosis, COPD and sleep-disordered breathing morbidity