机器人辅助步态训练对多发性硬化症的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1177/15459683231167850
Fu-An Yang, Chien-Lin Lin, Wan-Chien Huang, Hsun-Yi Wang, Chih-Wei Peng, Hung-Chou Chen
{"title":"机器人辅助步态训练对多发性硬化症的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Fu-An Yang,&nbsp;Chien-Lin Lin,&nbsp;Wan-Chien Huang,&nbsp;Hsun-Yi Wang,&nbsp;Chih-Wei Peng,&nbsp;Hung-Chou Chen","doi":"10.1177/15459683231167850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent meta-analyses, robot-assisted gait training for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have yielded limited clinical benefits compared with conventional overground gait training.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect of robot-assisted gait training for patients with MS on clinical outcomes through a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for relevant studies in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database databases from their inception to April 7, 2022. We selected studies that (1) included participants with MS, (2) used robot-assisted gait training as the intervention, (3) included conventional overground gait training or another gait training protocol as control treatment, and (4) reported clinical outcomes. Continuous variables are expressed as standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 16 studies enrolling 536 participants. Significant improvement was observed in the intervention group, with low heterogeneity at the end of the intervention with regard to walking velocity (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.15, 0.60]), walking endurance (SMD: 0.26, 95% CI [0.04, 0.48]), mobility (SMD: -0.37, 95% CI [-0.60, -0.14]), balance (SMD: 0.26, 95% CI [0.04, 0.48]), and fatigue (SMD: -0.27, 95% CI [-0.49, -0.04]). The results of subgroup analyses revealed improvements in these outcomes for the intervention group using grounded exoskeletons. No significant differences were noted in all the outcomes between the groups at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robot-assisted gait training with grounded exoskeletons exerts a positive short-term effect and is an adequate treatment option for patients with MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":56104,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","volume":"37 4","pages":"228-239"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Robot-Assisted Gait Training on Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Fu-An Yang,&nbsp;Chien-Lin Lin,&nbsp;Wan-Chien Huang,&nbsp;Hsun-Yi Wang,&nbsp;Chih-Wei Peng,&nbsp;Hung-Chou Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15459683231167850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent meta-analyses, robot-assisted gait training for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have yielded limited clinical benefits compared with conventional overground gait training.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect of robot-assisted gait training for patients with MS on clinical outcomes through a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for relevant studies in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database databases from their inception to April 7, 2022. We selected studies that (1) included participants with MS, (2) used robot-assisted gait training as the intervention, (3) included conventional overground gait training or another gait training protocol as control treatment, and (4) reported clinical outcomes. Continuous variables are expressed as standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 16 studies enrolling 536 participants. Significant improvement was observed in the intervention group, with low heterogeneity at the end of the intervention with regard to walking velocity (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.15, 0.60]), walking endurance (SMD: 0.26, 95% CI [0.04, 0.48]), mobility (SMD: -0.37, 95% CI [-0.60, -0.14]), balance (SMD: 0.26, 95% CI [0.04, 0.48]), and fatigue (SMD: -0.27, 95% CI [-0.49, -0.04]). The results of subgroup analyses revealed improvements in these outcomes for the intervention group using grounded exoskeletons. No significant differences were noted in all the outcomes between the groups at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robot-assisted gait training with grounded exoskeletons exerts a positive short-term effect and is an adequate treatment option for patients with MS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair\",\"volume\":\"37 4\",\"pages\":\"228-239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683231167850\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683231167850","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:在最近的荟萃分析中,与传统的地面步态训练相比,机器人辅助步态训练对多发性硬化症(MS)患者的临床效果有限。目的:通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,探讨机器人辅助步态训练对多发性硬化症患者临床预后的影响。方法:检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和物理治疗证据数据库从建立到2022年4月7日的相关研究。我们选择了以下研究:(1)纳入MS患者,(2)使用机器人辅助步态训练作为干预,(3)包括传统的地面步态训练或另一种步态训练方案作为对照治疗,以及(4)报告临床结果。连续变量用95%置信区间的标准化均值差表示。采用RevMan 5.4软件进行统计分析。结果:我们纳入16项研究,共纳入536名受试者。干预组有显著改善,干预结束时行走速度(标准化平均差[SMD]: 0.38, 95%可信区间[CI]:[0.15, 0.60])、行走耐力(SMD: 0.26, 95% CI[0.04, 0.48])、活动能力(SMD: -0.37, 95% CI[-0.60, -0.14])、平衡(SMD: 0.26, 95% CI[0.04, 0.48])和疲劳(SMD: -0.27, 95% CI[-0.49, -0.04])的异质性较低。亚组分析的结果显示,使用接地外骨骼的干预组在这些结果上有所改善。随访时,两组间的所有结果均无显著差异。结论:机器人辅助的接地外骨骼步态训练具有积极的短期效果,是多发性硬化症患者的适当治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Robot-Assisted Gait Training on Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background: In recent meta-analyses, robot-assisted gait training for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have yielded limited clinical benefits compared with conventional overground gait training.

Objective: To investigate the effect of robot-assisted gait training for patients with MS on clinical outcomes through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: We searched for relevant studies in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database databases from their inception to April 7, 2022. We selected studies that (1) included participants with MS, (2) used robot-assisted gait training as the intervention, (3) included conventional overground gait training or another gait training protocol as control treatment, and (4) reported clinical outcomes. Continuous variables are expressed as standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 software.

Results: We included 16 studies enrolling 536 participants. Significant improvement was observed in the intervention group, with low heterogeneity at the end of the intervention with regard to walking velocity (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.15, 0.60]), walking endurance (SMD: 0.26, 95% CI [0.04, 0.48]), mobility (SMD: -0.37, 95% CI [-0.60, -0.14]), balance (SMD: 0.26, 95% CI [0.04, 0.48]), and fatigue (SMD: -0.27, 95% CI [-0.49, -0.04]). The results of subgroup analyses revealed improvements in these outcomes for the intervention group using grounded exoskeletons. No significant differences were noted in all the outcomes between the groups at follow-up.

Conclusions: Robot-assisted gait training with grounded exoskeletons exerts a positive short-term effect and is an adequate treatment option for patients with MS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair (NNR) offers innovative and reliable reports relevant to functional recovery from neural injury and long term neurologic care. The journal''s unique focus is evidence-based basic and clinical practice and research. NNR deals with the management and fundamental mechanisms of functional recovery from conditions such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer''s disease, brain and spinal cord injuries, and peripheral nerve injuries.
期刊最新文献
Altered Corticospinal and Intracortical Excitability After Stroke: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. Hemodynamics of the Frontopolar and Dorsolateral Pre-Frontal Cortex in People with Multiple Sclerosis During Walking, Cognitive Subtraction, and Cognitive-Motor Dual-Task. Comparative Efficacy of Cognitive Training for Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Comparable outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures and for rotator cuff arthropathy in a predominantly asian population. A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate a Digital Therapeutic to Enhance Gait Function in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1