一次性输尿管镜检查与环境足迹:当前证据综述。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Current Urology Reports Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1007/s11934-023-01154-9
George Brown, Andrea Ong, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Niall F Davis, Andreas Skolarikos, Bhaskar Somani
{"title":"一次性输尿管镜检查与环境足迹:当前证据综述。","authors":"George Brown,&nbsp;Andrea Ong,&nbsp;Patrick Juliebø-Jones,&nbsp;Niall F Davis,&nbsp;Andreas Skolarikos,&nbsp;Bhaskar Somani","doi":"10.1007/s11934-023-01154-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Ureteroscopy is a well-established treatment modality for kidney and ureteric calculi in addition to playing a key role in upper tract cancer diagnostics. Traditional reusable flexible ureteroscopes are technologically advanced and expensive pieces of equipment that require repeat sterilisation and periodical repair. These issues have led to the development of single-use flexible ureteroscopes that are disposed of after each case. Whilst this may be advantageous in many respects, the environmental impact of such technology is yet to be fully determined. The aim of this review is to therefore identify and summarise the available literature concerning the environmental footprint of single-use ureteroscopy.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>To identify the latest research on this topic, a systematic search of world literature was conducted using the Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO databases. PRISMA guidelines were followed and articles were assessed by all authors and relevant study results were included in a narrative format. Only one relevant article was identified and included. This study found that a single-use flexible ureteroscope (LithoVue<sup>TM</sup> by Boston Scientific) generated an equivalent amount of carbon dioxide per case to a contemporary reusable flexible ureteroscope. Literature concerning the environmental footprint of single-use ureteroscopy is worryingly lacking. No conclusions can be definitively drawn from a single study and further research is imperative given the global climate crisis and the significant contribution that healthcare services have to the environmental problem.</p>","PeriodicalId":11112,"journal":{"name":"Current Urology Reports","volume":"24 6","pages":"281-285"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-Use Ureteroscopy and Environmental Footprint: Review of Current Evidence.\",\"authors\":\"George Brown,&nbsp;Andrea Ong,&nbsp;Patrick Juliebø-Jones,&nbsp;Niall F Davis,&nbsp;Andreas Skolarikos,&nbsp;Bhaskar Somani\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11934-023-01154-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Ureteroscopy is a well-established treatment modality for kidney and ureteric calculi in addition to playing a key role in upper tract cancer diagnostics. Traditional reusable flexible ureteroscopes are technologically advanced and expensive pieces of equipment that require repeat sterilisation and periodical repair. These issues have led to the development of single-use flexible ureteroscopes that are disposed of after each case. Whilst this may be advantageous in many respects, the environmental impact of such technology is yet to be fully determined. The aim of this review is to therefore identify and summarise the available literature concerning the environmental footprint of single-use ureteroscopy.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>To identify the latest research on this topic, a systematic search of world literature was conducted using the Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO databases. PRISMA guidelines were followed and articles were assessed by all authors and relevant study results were included in a narrative format. Only one relevant article was identified and included. This study found that a single-use flexible ureteroscope (LithoVue<sup>TM</sup> by Boston Scientific) generated an equivalent amount of carbon dioxide per case to a contemporary reusable flexible ureteroscope. Literature concerning the environmental footprint of single-use ureteroscopy is worryingly lacking. No conclusions can be definitively drawn from a single study and further research is imperative given the global climate crisis and the significant contribution that healthcare services have to the environmental problem.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Urology Reports\",\"volume\":\"24 6\",\"pages\":\"281-285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Urology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-023-01154-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Urology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-023-01154-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

综述目的:输尿管镜检查除了在上尿路肿瘤诊断中发挥关键作用外,也是肾脏和输尿管结石的一种成熟的治疗方式。传统的可重复使用的柔性输尿管镜技术先进,设备昂贵,需要反复消毒和定期维修。这些问题导致了一次性柔性输尿管镜的发展,这种输尿管镜在每次手术后都会被处理掉。虽然这在许多方面可能是有利的,但这种技术对环境的影响还有待充分确定。因此,本综述的目的是识别和总结有关一次性输尿管镜检查的环境足迹的现有文献。最近的发现:为了确定这一主题的最新研究,使用Medline, Embase和PsycINFO数据库对世界文献进行了系统的搜索。遵循PRISMA指南,所有作者对文章进行评估,并将相关研究结果纳入叙述格式。只确定并列入了一篇相关文章。这项研究发现,一个一次性使用的柔性输尿管镜(波士顿科学公司的LithoVueTM)每箱产生的二氧化碳量与一个当代可重复使用的柔性输尿管镜相当。令人担忧的是,关于一次性输尿管镜检查的环境足迹的文献缺乏。从一项研究中无法得出明确的结论,鉴于全球气候危机和医疗保健服务对环境问题的重大贡献,进一步的研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Single-Use Ureteroscopy and Environmental Footprint: Review of Current Evidence.

Purpose of review: Ureteroscopy is a well-established treatment modality for kidney and ureteric calculi in addition to playing a key role in upper tract cancer diagnostics. Traditional reusable flexible ureteroscopes are technologically advanced and expensive pieces of equipment that require repeat sterilisation and periodical repair. These issues have led to the development of single-use flexible ureteroscopes that are disposed of after each case. Whilst this may be advantageous in many respects, the environmental impact of such technology is yet to be fully determined. The aim of this review is to therefore identify and summarise the available literature concerning the environmental footprint of single-use ureteroscopy.

Recent findings: To identify the latest research on this topic, a systematic search of world literature was conducted using the Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO databases. PRISMA guidelines were followed and articles were assessed by all authors and relevant study results were included in a narrative format. Only one relevant article was identified and included. This study found that a single-use flexible ureteroscope (LithoVueTM by Boston Scientific) generated an equivalent amount of carbon dioxide per case to a contemporary reusable flexible ureteroscope. Literature concerning the environmental footprint of single-use ureteroscopy is worryingly lacking. No conclusions can be definitively drawn from a single study and further research is imperative given the global climate crisis and the significant contribution that healthcare services have to the environmental problem.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Urology Reports
Current Urology Reports UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: This journal intends to review the most important, recently published findings in the field of urology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal elucidates current and emerging approaches to the care and prevention of urologic diseases and conditions. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as benign prostatic hyperplasia, erectile dysfunction, female urology, and kidney disease. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
期刊最新文献
Professional Burnout and Career Choice Regret in Urology Residents. Third-Line Therapeutic Interventions for Non-Neurogenic Bladder Dysfunction in Children. Results of Radical Nephrectomy and Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy. Artificial Intelligence as a Tool for Creating Patient Visit Summary: A Scoping Review and Guide to Implementation in an Erectile Dysfunction Clinic. Management of Post-RALP SUI and ED - What are and What Should we be Doing?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1