乳腺超声对三阴性和HER2+乳腺癌亚型的机器学习分析。

Breast disease Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3233/BD-220018
Romuald Ferre, Janne Elst, Seanthan Senthilnathan, Andrew Lagree, Sami Tabbarah, Fang-I Lu, Ali Sadeghi-Naini, William T Tran, Belinda Curpen
{"title":"乳腺超声对三阴性和HER2+乳腺癌亚型的机器学习分析。","authors":"Romuald Ferre,&nbsp;Janne Elst,&nbsp;Seanthan Senthilnathan,&nbsp;Andrew Lagree,&nbsp;Sami Tabbarah,&nbsp;Fang-I Lu,&nbsp;Ali Sadeghi-Naini,&nbsp;William T Tran,&nbsp;Belinda Curpen","doi":"10.3233/BD-220018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Early diagnosis of triple-negative (TN) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer is important due to its increased risk of micrometastatic spread necessitating early treatment and for guiding targeted therapies. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of machine learning (ML) classification of newly diagnosed breast masses into TN versus non-TN (NTN) and HER2+ versus HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer, using radiomic features extracted from grayscale ultrasound (US) b-mode images.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review identified 88 female patients who underwent diagnostic breast US imaging, had confirmation of invasive malignancy on pathology and receptor status determined on immunohistochemistry available. The patients were classified as TN, NTN, HER2+ or HER2- for ground-truth labelling. For image analysis, breast masses were manually segmented by a breast radiologist. Radiomic features were extracted per image and used for predictive modelling. Supervised ML classifiers included: logistic regression, k-nearest neighbour, and Naïve Bayes. Classification performance measures were calculated on an independent (unseen) test set. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity (%), and specificity (%) were reported for each classifier.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The logistic regression classifier demonstrated the highest AUC: 0.824 (sensitivity: 81.8%, specificity: 74.2%) for the TN sub-group and 0.778 (sensitivity: 71.4%, specificity: 71.6%) for the HER2 sub-group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ML classifiers demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy in classifying TN versus NTN and HER2+ versus HER2- breast cancers using US images. Identification of more aggressive breast cancer subtypes early in the diagnostic process could help achieve better prognoses by prioritizing clinical referral and prompting adequate early treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9224,"journal":{"name":"Breast disease","volume":"42 1","pages":"59-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning analysis of breast ultrasound to classify triple negative and HER2+ breast cancer subtypes.\",\"authors\":\"Romuald Ferre,&nbsp;Janne Elst,&nbsp;Seanthan Senthilnathan,&nbsp;Andrew Lagree,&nbsp;Sami Tabbarah,&nbsp;Fang-I Lu,&nbsp;Ali Sadeghi-Naini,&nbsp;William T Tran,&nbsp;Belinda Curpen\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/BD-220018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Early diagnosis of triple-negative (TN) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer is important due to its increased risk of micrometastatic spread necessitating early treatment and for guiding targeted therapies. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of machine learning (ML) classification of newly diagnosed breast masses into TN versus non-TN (NTN) and HER2+ versus HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer, using radiomic features extracted from grayscale ultrasound (US) b-mode images.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review identified 88 female patients who underwent diagnostic breast US imaging, had confirmation of invasive malignancy on pathology and receptor status determined on immunohistochemistry available. The patients were classified as TN, NTN, HER2+ or HER2- for ground-truth labelling. For image analysis, breast masses were manually segmented by a breast radiologist. Radiomic features were extracted per image and used for predictive modelling. Supervised ML classifiers included: logistic regression, k-nearest neighbour, and Naïve Bayes. Classification performance measures were calculated on an independent (unseen) test set. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity (%), and specificity (%) were reported for each classifier.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The logistic regression classifier demonstrated the highest AUC: 0.824 (sensitivity: 81.8%, specificity: 74.2%) for the TN sub-group and 0.778 (sensitivity: 71.4%, specificity: 71.6%) for the HER2 sub-group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ML classifiers demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy in classifying TN versus NTN and HER2+ versus HER2- breast cancers using US images. Identification of more aggressive breast cancer subtypes early in the diagnostic process could help achieve better prognoses by prioritizing clinical referral and prompting adequate early treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast disease\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"59-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/BD-220018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/BD-220018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:三阴性(TN)和人表皮生长因子受体2阳性(HER2+)乳腺癌的早期诊断非常重要,因为其微转移扩散的风险增加,需要早期治疗并指导靶向治疗。本研究旨在评估机器学习(ML)分类新诊断乳腺肿块为TN与非TN (NTN), HER2+与HER2阴性(HER2-)乳腺癌的诊断性能,使用从灰度超声(US) b型图像中提取的放射学特征。材料和方法:回顾性分析88例接受乳腺超声诊断、病理证实浸润性恶性肿瘤、免疫组织化学确定受体状态的女性患者。将患者分为TN、NTN、HER2+或HER2-进行基线标记。为了进行图像分析,乳房肿块由乳房放射科医生手工分割。每张图像提取放射学特征并用于预测建模。有监督的ML分类器包括:逻辑回归、k近邻和Naïve贝叶斯。分类性能指标在独立(未见)测试集上计算。报告每个分类器的受者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、灵敏度(%)和特异性(%)。结果:logistic回归分类器显示,TN亚组的AUC最高,为0.824(敏感性:81.8%,特异性:74.2%);HER2亚组的AUC最高,为0.778(敏感性:71.4%,特异性:71.6%)。结论:ML分类器在使用US图像对乳腺癌进行TN与NTN、HER2+与HER2-的分类时具有较高的诊断准确性。在诊断过程的早期识别更具侵袭性的乳腺癌亚型可以通过优先考虑临床转诊和促进适当的早期治疗来帮助实现更好的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine learning analysis of breast ultrasound to classify triple negative and HER2+ breast cancer subtypes.

Objectives: Early diagnosis of triple-negative (TN) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer is important due to its increased risk of micrometastatic spread necessitating early treatment and for guiding targeted therapies. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of machine learning (ML) classification of newly diagnosed breast masses into TN versus non-TN (NTN) and HER2+ versus HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer, using radiomic features extracted from grayscale ultrasound (US) b-mode images.

Materials and methods: A retrospective chart review identified 88 female patients who underwent diagnostic breast US imaging, had confirmation of invasive malignancy on pathology and receptor status determined on immunohistochemistry available. The patients were classified as TN, NTN, HER2+ or HER2- for ground-truth labelling. For image analysis, breast masses were manually segmented by a breast radiologist. Radiomic features were extracted per image and used for predictive modelling. Supervised ML classifiers included: logistic regression, k-nearest neighbour, and Naïve Bayes. Classification performance measures were calculated on an independent (unseen) test set. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity (%), and specificity (%) were reported for each classifier.

Results: The logistic regression classifier demonstrated the highest AUC: 0.824 (sensitivity: 81.8%, specificity: 74.2%) for the TN sub-group and 0.778 (sensitivity: 71.4%, specificity: 71.6%) for the HER2 sub-group.

Conclusion: ML classifiers demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy in classifying TN versus NTN and HER2+ versus HER2- breast cancers using US images. Identification of more aggressive breast cancer subtypes early in the diagnostic process could help achieve better prognoses by prioritizing clinical referral and prompting adequate early treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Breast disease
Breast disease Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The recent expansion of work in the field of breast cancer inevitably will hasten discoveries that will have impact on patient outcome. The breadth of this research that spans basic science, clinical medicine, epidemiology, and public policy poses difficulties for investigators. Not only is it necessary to be facile in comprehending ideas from many disciplines, but also important to understand the public implications of these discoveries. Breast Disease publishes review issues devoted to an in-depth analysis of the scientific and public implications of recent research on a specific problem in breast cancer. Thus, the reviews will not only discuss recent discoveries but will also reflect on their impact in breast cancer research or clinical management.
期刊最新文献
Sentinel node in breast cancer as an indicator of quality in medical care: Evaluation of statistics in Colombia. Telangiectasias induced by combination tucatinib and ado-trastuzumab emtansine in a patient with metastatic breast cancer. Clinicopathological analysis of 38 male patients diagnosed with breast cancer. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer pathological stage at diagnosis in Tunisian patients. Use of axillary ultrasound to guide breast cancer management in the genomic assay era.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1