临床医生对炎症性肠病指南的依从性:一项障碍和促进因素的定性研究结果。

IF 1.8 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Crohn's & Colitis 360 Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1093/crocol/otac018
Ria Kanazaki, Ben Smith, Afaf Girgis, Susan J Connor
{"title":"临床医生对炎症性肠病指南的依从性:一项障碍和促进因素的定性研究结果。","authors":"Ria Kanazaki,&nbsp;Ben Smith,&nbsp;Afaf Girgis,&nbsp;Susan J Connor","doi":"10.1093/crocol/otac018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the evolving inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management landscape, it is critical that gastroenterologists keep up to date with the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Several studies in IBD have documented suboptimal adherence to CPGs. We aimed to gain an in-depth understanding of guideline adherence barriers reported by gastroenterologists and determine how evidence-based education can best be delivered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of gastroenterologists' representative of the current workforce. Questions focused on previously identified problematic areas and shaped by the theoretical domains framework, a theory-informed approach to understanding clinician behavior, to assess all determinants of behavior. Questions explored perceived barriers to adherence and clinicians' preferred content and modes of delivery for an educational intervention. Interviews were conducted by a single interviewer and qualitative analysis performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 interviews were conducted before data saturation was achieved (male = 12, work in a metropolitan area = 17). Five dominant subthemes for barriers to adherence emerged: negative experiences impacting future decisions, time constraints, long guidelines are impractical, unfamiliar with guideline specifics and prescribing restrictions. Adherence enablers were identified including features that improved the usability of CPGs. Computer- or smart phone-based educational interventions were preferred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified several barriers and enablers for IBD guideline adherence and gained insight into how gastroenterologists prefer to receive evidence-based education. These results will inform the development of a targeted intervention to improve IBD guideline adherence. Improving guideline adherence is expected to facilitate standardized IBD care, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10847,"journal":{"name":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/30/c6/otac018.PMC10174629.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinician Adherence to Inflammatory Bowel Disease Guidelines: Results of a Qualitative Study of Barriers and Enablers.\",\"authors\":\"Ria Kanazaki,&nbsp;Ben Smith,&nbsp;Afaf Girgis,&nbsp;Susan J Connor\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/crocol/otac018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the evolving inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management landscape, it is critical that gastroenterologists keep up to date with the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Several studies in IBD have documented suboptimal adherence to CPGs. We aimed to gain an in-depth understanding of guideline adherence barriers reported by gastroenterologists and determine how evidence-based education can best be delivered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of gastroenterologists' representative of the current workforce. Questions focused on previously identified problematic areas and shaped by the theoretical domains framework, a theory-informed approach to understanding clinician behavior, to assess all determinants of behavior. Questions explored perceived barriers to adherence and clinicians' preferred content and modes of delivery for an educational intervention. Interviews were conducted by a single interviewer and qualitative analysis performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 interviews were conducted before data saturation was achieved (male = 12, work in a metropolitan area = 17). Five dominant subthemes for barriers to adherence emerged: negative experiences impacting future decisions, time constraints, long guidelines are impractical, unfamiliar with guideline specifics and prescribing restrictions. Adherence enablers were identified including features that improved the usability of CPGs. Computer- or smart phone-based educational interventions were preferred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified several barriers and enablers for IBD guideline adherence and gained insight into how gastroenterologists prefer to receive evidence-based education. These results will inform the development of a targeted intervention to improve IBD guideline adherence. Improving guideline adherence is expected to facilitate standardized IBD care, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crohn's & Colitis 360\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/30/c6/otac018.PMC10174629.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crohn's & Colitis 360\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otac018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otac018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着炎症性肠病(IBD)管理领域的发展,胃肠病学家跟上临床实践指南(CPGs)的步伐至关重要。几项IBD研究表明,CPGs的依从性不理想。我们的目的是深入了解胃肠病学家报告的指南依从性障碍,并确定如何最好地提供循证教育。方法:访谈进行了有目的的样本的胃肠病学家代表目前的劳动力。问题集中在先前确定的问题领域,并由理论领域框架形成,这是一种理解临床医生行为的理论知情方法,以评估行为的所有决定因素。问题探讨了对依从性的认知障碍和临床医生对教育干预的首选内容和交付模式。访谈由单一采访者进行,并进行定性分析。结果:在达到数据饱和之前,共进行了20次访谈(男性= 12,在大都市地区工作= 17)。阻碍依从性的五个主要子主题出现了:影响未来决策的负面经历,时间限制,长指南不切实际,不熟悉指南细节和处方限制。确定了依从性促进因素,包括提高cpg可用性的功能。以电脑或智能手机为基础的教育干预是首选。结论:本研究确定了IBD指南依从性的几个障碍和推动因素,并深入了解了胃肠病学家如何倾向于接受循证教育。这些结果将为有针对性的干预措施的发展提供信息,以提高IBD指南的依从性。提高指南依从性有望促进标准化IBD护理,最终改善患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinician Adherence to Inflammatory Bowel Disease Guidelines: Results of a Qualitative Study of Barriers and Enablers.

Background: With the evolving inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management landscape, it is critical that gastroenterologists keep up to date with the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Several studies in IBD have documented suboptimal adherence to CPGs. We aimed to gain an in-depth understanding of guideline adherence barriers reported by gastroenterologists and determine how evidence-based education can best be delivered.

Methods: Interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of gastroenterologists' representative of the current workforce. Questions focused on previously identified problematic areas and shaped by the theoretical domains framework, a theory-informed approach to understanding clinician behavior, to assess all determinants of behavior. Questions explored perceived barriers to adherence and clinicians' preferred content and modes of delivery for an educational intervention. Interviews were conducted by a single interviewer and qualitative analysis performed.

Results: A total of 20 interviews were conducted before data saturation was achieved (male = 12, work in a metropolitan area = 17). Five dominant subthemes for barriers to adherence emerged: negative experiences impacting future decisions, time constraints, long guidelines are impractical, unfamiliar with guideline specifics and prescribing restrictions. Adherence enablers were identified including features that improved the usability of CPGs. Computer- or smart phone-based educational interventions were preferred.

Conclusions: This study identified several barriers and enablers for IBD guideline adherence and gained insight into how gastroenterologists prefer to receive evidence-based education. These results will inform the development of a targeted intervention to improve IBD guideline adherence. Improving guideline adherence is expected to facilitate standardized IBD care, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Crohn's & Colitis 360
Crohn's & Colitis 360 Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Real-World Treatment Outcomes Associated With Early Versus Delayed Vedolizumab Initiation in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. Like a Punch in the Gut: A Novel Perspective On Annual Recurrences of Ulcerative Colitis. Interventions for Adjunctive Care in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Permanent Ileostomy: A Systematic Review. Clinical Approach to STRIDE-II in Real-Life Settings: Analysis and Practical Recommendations. Evaluation of the Symptoms and Clinical Characteristics of Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis That Affect Healthcare Providers' Treatment Choices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1