高剂量奥氮平治疗难治性精神分裂症:一项系统综述。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20451253231168788
Louisa Gannon, John Reynolds, Martin Mahon, Fiona Gaughran, John Lally
{"title":"高剂量奥氮平治疗难治性精神分裂症:一项系统综述。","authors":"Louisa Gannon,&nbsp;John Reynolds,&nbsp;Martin Mahon,&nbsp;Fiona Gaughran,&nbsp;John Lally","doi":"10.1177/20451253231168788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) affects approximately 30% of people with schizophrenia. Clozapine is the gold standard treatment for TRS but is not always suitable, with a proportion of individuals intolerant of side effects or unable to engage in necessary blood monitoring. Given the profound impact TRS can have on those affected, alternative pharmacological approaches to care are needed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To review the literature on the efficacy and tolerability of high-dose olanzapine (>20 mg daily) in adults with TRS.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a systematic review.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>We searched for eligible trials published prior to April 2022 in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Google Scholar. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria [five randomised controlled trials (RCTs), one randomised crossover trial and four open label studies]. Data were extracted for predefined primary outcomes (efficacy, tolerability).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with standard treatment, high-dose olanzapine was non-inferior in four RCTs, three of which used clozapine as the comparator. Clozapine was superior to high-dose olanzapine in a double-blind crossover trial. Open-label studies demonstrated tentative evidence in support of high-dose olanzapine use. It was better tolerated than clozapine and chlorpromazine in two respective RCTs, and was generally well tolerated in open-label studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This evidence suggests high-dose olanzapine is superior for TRS when compared with other commonly used first- and second-generation antipsychotics, including haloperidol and risperidone. In comparison with clozapine, the data are encouraging for the use of high-dose olanzapine where clozapine use is problematic, but larger, better designed trials are needed to assess the comparative efficacy of both treatments. There is insufficient evidence to consider high-dose olanzapine equivalent to clozapine when clozapine is not contraindicated. Overall, high-dose olanzapine was well tolerated, with no serious side effects.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>This systematic review was preregistered with PROSPERO [CRD42022312817].</p>","PeriodicalId":23127,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5a/64/10.1177_20451253231168788.PMC10176543.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-dose olanzapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Louisa Gannon,&nbsp;John Reynolds,&nbsp;Martin Mahon,&nbsp;Fiona Gaughran,&nbsp;John Lally\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20451253231168788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) affects approximately 30% of people with schizophrenia. Clozapine is the gold standard treatment for TRS but is not always suitable, with a proportion of individuals intolerant of side effects or unable to engage in necessary blood monitoring. Given the profound impact TRS can have on those affected, alternative pharmacological approaches to care are needed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To review the literature on the efficacy and tolerability of high-dose olanzapine (>20 mg daily) in adults with TRS.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a systematic review.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>We searched for eligible trials published prior to April 2022 in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Google Scholar. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria [five randomised controlled trials (RCTs), one randomised crossover trial and four open label studies]. Data were extracted for predefined primary outcomes (efficacy, tolerability).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with standard treatment, high-dose olanzapine was non-inferior in four RCTs, three of which used clozapine as the comparator. Clozapine was superior to high-dose olanzapine in a double-blind crossover trial. Open-label studies demonstrated tentative evidence in support of high-dose olanzapine use. It was better tolerated than clozapine and chlorpromazine in two respective RCTs, and was generally well tolerated in open-label studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This evidence suggests high-dose olanzapine is superior for TRS when compared with other commonly used first- and second-generation antipsychotics, including haloperidol and risperidone. In comparison with clozapine, the data are encouraging for the use of high-dose olanzapine where clozapine use is problematic, but larger, better designed trials are needed to assess the comparative efficacy of both treatments. There is insufficient evidence to consider high-dose olanzapine equivalent to clozapine when clozapine is not contraindicated. Overall, high-dose olanzapine was well tolerated, with no serious side effects.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>This systematic review was preregistered with PROSPERO [CRD42022312817].</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5a/64/10.1177_20451253231168788.PMC10176543.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253231168788\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253231168788","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:难治性精神分裂症(TRS)影响了大约30%的精神分裂症患者。氯氮平是TRS的金标准治疗,但并不总是合适的,有一部分人不能忍受副作用或无法进行必要的血液监测。鉴于TRS对患者可能产生的深远影响,需要其他药物治疗方法。目的:回顾大剂量奥氮平(> 20mg / d)治疗成人TRS的疗效和耐受性的文献。设计:这是一个系统的回顾。数据来源和方法:我们在PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus和Google Scholar中检索了2022年4月之前发表的符合条件的试验。10项研究符合纳入标准[5项随机对照试验(RCTs), 1项随机交叉试验和4项开放标签研究]。提取预先确定的主要结局(疗效、耐受性)的数据。结果:与标准治疗相比,4项随机对照试验中,大剂量奥氮平效果不差,其中3项以氯氮平为比较物。在一项双盲交叉试验中氯氮平优于大剂量奥氮平。开放标签研究显示了支持大剂量奥氮平使用的初步证据。在两项随机对照试验中,它的耐受性优于氯氮平和氯丙嗪,并且在开放标签研究中通常耐受性良好。结论:与其他常用的第一代和第二代抗精神病药物(包括氟哌啶醇和利培酮)相比,大剂量奥氮平治疗TRS的效果更好。与氯氮平相比,在氯氮平使用有问题的情况下,使用大剂量奥氮平的数据令人鼓舞,但需要更大规模、设计更好的试验来评估两种治疗的比较疗效。当氯氮平没有禁忌时,没有足够的证据表明大剂量奥氮平等同于氯氮平。总体而言,大剂量奥氮平耐受性良好,无严重副作用。注册:本系统评价已在PROSPERO预注册[CRD42022312817]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
High-dose olanzapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review.

Background: Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) affects approximately 30% of people with schizophrenia. Clozapine is the gold standard treatment for TRS but is not always suitable, with a proportion of individuals intolerant of side effects or unable to engage in necessary blood monitoring. Given the profound impact TRS can have on those affected, alternative pharmacological approaches to care are needed.

Objectives: To review the literature on the efficacy and tolerability of high-dose olanzapine (>20 mg daily) in adults with TRS.

Design: This is a systematic review.

Data sources and methods: We searched for eligible trials published prior to April 2022 in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Google Scholar. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria [five randomised controlled trials (RCTs), one randomised crossover trial and four open label studies]. Data were extracted for predefined primary outcomes (efficacy, tolerability).

Results: Compared with standard treatment, high-dose olanzapine was non-inferior in four RCTs, three of which used clozapine as the comparator. Clozapine was superior to high-dose olanzapine in a double-blind crossover trial. Open-label studies demonstrated tentative evidence in support of high-dose olanzapine use. It was better tolerated than clozapine and chlorpromazine in two respective RCTs, and was generally well tolerated in open-label studies.

Conclusion: This evidence suggests high-dose olanzapine is superior for TRS when compared with other commonly used first- and second-generation antipsychotics, including haloperidol and risperidone. In comparison with clozapine, the data are encouraging for the use of high-dose olanzapine where clozapine use is problematic, but larger, better designed trials are needed to assess the comparative efficacy of both treatments. There is insufficient evidence to consider high-dose olanzapine equivalent to clozapine when clozapine is not contraindicated. Overall, high-dose olanzapine was well tolerated, with no serious side effects.

Registration: This systematic review was preregistered with PROSPERO [CRD42022312817].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
35
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of psychopharmacology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in psychopharmacology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
期刊最新文献
Use of an injection of aripiprazole given once every 2 months (Abilify Asimtufii®) in people with bipolar I disorder: a Plain Language Summary of Publication. Exploring the clinical factors affecting lithium dose and plasma level and the effect of brand. Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder and its comparison with high-frequency stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Risperidone ISM®: review and update of its usefulness in all phases of schizophrenia. Incorporation of a specialist mental health clinical pharmacist within a primary care network: patient referrals, prescribing decisions, and clinical outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1