利用核磁共振测井估算冰川含水层导电性的模型评价。

IF 2 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Groundwater Pub Date : 2023-04-14 DOI:10.1111/gwat.13318
Alexander K. Kendrick, Rosemary Knight, Carole D. Johnson, Gaisheng Liu, David J. Hart, James J. Butler Jr, Randall J. Hunt
{"title":"利用核磁共振测井估算冰川含水层导电性的模型评价。","authors":"Alexander K. Kendrick,&nbsp;Rosemary Knight,&nbsp;Carole D. Johnson,&nbsp;Gaisheng Liu,&nbsp;David J. Hart,&nbsp;James J. Butler Jr,&nbsp;Randall J. Hunt","doi":"10.1111/gwat.13318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logging is a promising method for estimating hydraulic conductivity (<i>K</i>). During the past ∼60 years, NMR logging has been used for petroleum applications, and different models have been developed for deriving estimates of permeability. These models involve calibration parameters whose values were determined through decades of research on sandstones and carbonates. We assessed the use of five models to derive estimates of <i>K</i> in glacial aquifers from NMR logging data acquired in two wells at each of two field sites in central Wisconsin, USA. Measurements of <i>K</i>, obtained with a direct push permeameter (DPP), <i>K</i><sub>DPP</sub>, were used to obtain the calibration parameters in the Schlumberger-Doll Research, Seevers, Timur-Coates, Kozeny-Godefroy, and sum-of-echoes (SOE) models so as to predict <i>K</i> from the NMR data; and were also used to assess the ability of the models to predict <i>K</i><sub>DPP</sub>. We obtained four well-scale calibration parameter values for each model using the NMR and DPP measurements in each well; and one study-scale parameter value for each model by using all data. The SOE model achieved an agreement with <i>K</i><sub>DPP</sub> that matched or exceeded that of the other models. The Timur-Coates estimates of <i>K</i> were found to be substantially different from <i>K</i><sub>DPP</sub>. Although the well-scale parameter values for the Schlumberger-Doll, Seevers, and SOE models were found to vary by less than a factor of 2, more research is needed to confirm their general applicability so that site-specific calibration is not required to obtain accurate estimates of <i>K</i> from NMR logging data.</p>","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"61 6","pages":"778-792"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwat.13318","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Models for Estimating Hydraulic Conductivity in Glacial Aquifers with NMR Logging\",\"authors\":\"Alexander K. Kendrick,&nbsp;Rosemary Knight,&nbsp;Carole D. Johnson,&nbsp;Gaisheng Liu,&nbsp;David J. Hart,&nbsp;James J. Butler Jr,&nbsp;Randall J. Hunt\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gwat.13318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logging is a promising method for estimating hydraulic conductivity (<i>K</i>). During the past ∼60 years, NMR logging has been used for petroleum applications, and different models have been developed for deriving estimates of permeability. These models involve calibration parameters whose values were determined through decades of research on sandstones and carbonates. We assessed the use of five models to derive estimates of <i>K</i> in glacial aquifers from NMR logging data acquired in two wells at each of two field sites in central Wisconsin, USA. Measurements of <i>K</i>, obtained with a direct push permeameter (DPP), <i>K</i><sub>DPP</sub>, were used to obtain the calibration parameters in the Schlumberger-Doll Research, Seevers, Timur-Coates, Kozeny-Godefroy, and sum-of-echoes (SOE) models so as to predict <i>K</i> from the NMR data; and were also used to assess the ability of the models to predict <i>K</i><sub>DPP</sub>. We obtained four well-scale calibration parameter values for each model using the NMR and DPP measurements in each well; and one study-scale parameter value for each model by using all data. The SOE model achieved an agreement with <i>K</i><sub>DPP</sub> that matched or exceeded that of the other models. The Timur-Coates estimates of <i>K</i> were found to be substantially different from <i>K</i><sub>DPP</sub>. Although the well-scale parameter values for the Schlumberger-Doll, Seevers, and SOE models were found to vary by less than a factor of 2, more research is needed to confirm their general applicability so that site-specific calibration is not required to obtain accurate estimates of <i>K</i> from NMR logging data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Groundwater\",\"volume\":\"61 6\",\"pages\":\"778-792\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwat.13318\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Groundwater\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwat.13318\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Groundwater","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwat.13318","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

核磁共振测井是一种很有前途的估算导水率的方法。过去~60 多年来,核磁共振测井一直被用于石油应用,并且已经开发了不同的模型来推导渗透率的估计值。这些模型涉及校准参数,其值是通过几十年对砂岩和碳酸盐岩的研究确定的。我们评估了使用五个模型从美国威斯康星州中部两个油田的两口井中获得的NMR测井数据中得出冰川含水层中K的估计值。使用直接推式渗透率计(DPP)KDPP获得的K测量值用于获得斯伦贝谢-多尔研究公司、Seevers、Timur Coates、Kozeny Godefroy,以及回波总和(SOE)模型,以便根据NMR数据预测K;并且还用于评估模型预测KDPP的能力。我们使用每个井中的NMR和DPP测量获得了每个模型的四个井级校准参数值;以及通过使用所有数据为每个模型提供一个研究量表参数值。SOE模型与KDPP达成了与其他模型相匹配或超过其他模型的协议。Timur-Coates对K的估计与KDPP有很大不同。尽管斯伦贝谢-多尔、Seevers和SOE模型的井尺度参数值的变化小于2倍,但还需要更多的研究来确认它们的普遍适用性,这样就不需要特定地点的校准来从NMR测井数据中获得K的准确估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Models for Estimating Hydraulic Conductivity in Glacial Aquifers with NMR Logging

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logging is a promising method for estimating hydraulic conductivity (K). During the past ∼60 years, NMR logging has been used for petroleum applications, and different models have been developed for deriving estimates of permeability. These models involve calibration parameters whose values were determined through decades of research on sandstones and carbonates. We assessed the use of five models to derive estimates of K in glacial aquifers from NMR logging data acquired in two wells at each of two field sites in central Wisconsin, USA. Measurements of K, obtained with a direct push permeameter (DPP), KDPP, were used to obtain the calibration parameters in the Schlumberger-Doll Research, Seevers, Timur-Coates, Kozeny-Godefroy, and sum-of-echoes (SOE) models so as to predict K from the NMR data; and were also used to assess the ability of the models to predict KDPP. We obtained four well-scale calibration parameter values for each model using the NMR and DPP measurements in each well; and one study-scale parameter value for each model by using all data. The SOE model achieved an agreement with KDPP that matched or exceeded that of the other models. The Timur-Coates estimates of K were found to be substantially different from KDPP. Although the well-scale parameter values for the Schlumberger-Doll, Seevers, and SOE models were found to vary by less than a factor of 2, more research is needed to confirm their general applicability so that site-specific calibration is not required to obtain accurate estimates of K from NMR logging data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Groundwater
Groundwater 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Ground Water is the leading international journal focused exclusively on ground water. Since 1963, Ground Water has published a dynamic mix of papers on topics related to ground water including ground water flow and well hydraulics, hydrogeochemistry and contaminant hydrogeology, application of geophysics, groundwater management and policy, and history of ground water hydrology. This is the journal you can count on to bring you the practical applications in ground water hydrology.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Jupyter Notebooks for Parameter Estimation, Uncertainty Analysis, and Optimization with PEST++ Remembering the Big Picture Exploring Freshwater Beneath the Ocean Floor Society News
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1