性别和性别少数群体的公平死亡护理:社会工作者的角色。

Jennifer L Wright-Berryman
{"title":"性别和性别少数群体的公平死亡护理:社会工作者的角色。","authors":"Jennifer L Wright-Berryman","doi":"10.1080/15524256.2023.2175104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Early in my career as a suicidologist, I was ignorant about the world of death care, outside of personal experiences attending funerals, celebrations of life, and other forms of memorial and disposition. At the American Association of Suicidology Conference in 2018, I overheard some colleagues discussing the lack of death education in schools. Soon after the conference, I received a phone call from a local pastor asking me to help him properly memorialize the life of a young person who’d died by suicide. Not long after that, I was contacted by a funeral provider, asking me a similar question. It occurred to me that death care providers didn’t know much about suicide, and I didn’t know enough about death care. My journey in studying death care in the United States was born from these conversations. Stigmatized forms of death were difficult for the providers to “get right”. I then wonderedis there anything else the U.S. death care industry needs more help to understand? I began reading the research on all things death and dying, starting with Jessica Mitford’s 1960s scathing expose of the funeral industry, The American Way of Death, then on to nearly every book and research study written since that time. What was largely missing from all these publications was the death care needs of sexual and gender minorities. Topics of culture, tradition, religion, economics, marketing, and policy were all addressed, but nothing was written about the experience of LGBTQIAþ people in the U.S. death care system. I’m not one to shy away from such a glaring omission in one of the largest industries in the United States. Funeral care is a 20-billion-dollar business, however, generally still privatized. Ninety percent of the 18,000 funeral homes in the U.S. are family-owned and operated, with the rest being corporately owned by companies like Service Corporation International (SCI). This is a source of pride for the industry and funeral homes market themselves as communityand family-oriented businesses. What they do not market themselves as is safe spaces for","PeriodicalId":45992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care","volume":"19 1","pages":"8-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equitable Death Care for Sexual and Gender Minorities: The Role for Social Workers.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer L Wright-Berryman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15524256.2023.2175104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Early in my career as a suicidologist, I was ignorant about the world of death care, outside of personal experiences attending funerals, celebrations of life, and other forms of memorial and disposition. At the American Association of Suicidology Conference in 2018, I overheard some colleagues discussing the lack of death education in schools. Soon after the conference, I received a phone call from a local pastor asking me to help him properly memorialize the life of a young person who’d died by suicide. Not long after that, I was contacted by a funeral provider, asking me a similar question. It occurred to me that death care providers didn’t know much about suicide, and I didn’t know enough about death care. My journey in studying death care in the United States was born from these conversations. Stigmatized forms of death were difficult for the providers to “get right”. I then wonderedis there anything else the U.S. death care industry needs more help to understand? I began reading the research on all things death and dying, starting with Jessica Mitford’s 1960s scathing expose of the funeral industry, The American Way of Death, then on to nearly every book and research study written since that time. What was largely missing from all these publications was the death care needs of sexual and gender minorities. Topics of culture, tradition, religion, economics, marketing, and policy were all addressed, but nothing was written about the experience of LGBTQIAþ people in the U.S. death care system. I’m not one to shy away from such a glaring omission in one of the largest industries in the United States. Funeral care is a 20-billion-dollar business, however, generally still privatized. Ninety percent of the 18,000 funeral homes in the U.S. are family-owned and operated, with the rest being corporately owned by companies like Service Corporation International (SCI). This is a source of pride for the industry and funeral homes market themselves as communityand family-oriented businesses. What they do not market themselves as is safe spaces for\",\"PeriodicalId\":45992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"8-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15524256.2023.2175104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15524256.2023.2175104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Equitable Death Care for Sexual and Gender Minorities: The Role for Social Workers.
Early in my career as a suicidologist, I was ignorant about the world of death care, outside of personal experiences attending funerals, celebrations of life, and other forms of memorial and disposition. At the American Association of Suicidology Conference in 2018, I overheard some colleagues discussing the lack of death education in schools. Soon after the conference, I received a phone call from a local pastor asking me to help him properly memorialize the life of a young person who’d died by suicide. Not long after that, I was contacted by a funeral provider, asking me a similar question. It occurred to me that death care providers didn’t know much about suicide, and I didn’t know enough about death care. My journey in studying death care in the United States was born from these conversations. Stigmatized forms of death were difficult for the providers to “get right”. I then wonderedis there anything else the U.S. death care industry needs more help to understand? I began reading the research on all things death and dying, starting with Jessica Mitford’s 1960s scathing expose of the funeral industry, The American Way of Death, then on to nearly every book and research study written since that time. What was largely missing from all these publications was the death care needs of sexual and gender minorities. Topics of culture, tradition, religion, economics, marketing, and policy were all addressed, but nothing was written about the experience of LGBTQIAþ people in the U.S. death care system. I’m not one to shy away from such a glaring omission in one of the largest industries in the United States. Funeral care is a 20-billion-dollar business, however, generally still privatized. Ninety percent of the 18,000 funeral homes in the U.S. are family-owned and operated, with the rest being corporately owned by companies like Service Corporation International (SCI). This is a source of pride for the industry and funeral homes market themselves as communityand family-oriented businesses. What they do not market themselves as is safe spaces for
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care, now affiliated with the Social Work in Hospice and Palliative Care Network, explores issues crucial to caring for terminally ill patients and their families. Academics and social work practitioners present current research, articles, and continuing features on the "state of the art" of social work practice, including interdisciplinary interventions, practice innovations, practice evaluations, end-of-life decision-making, grief and bereavement, and ethical and moral issues. The Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care combines theory and practice to facilitate an understanding of the multi-level issues surrounding care for those in pain and suffering from painful, debilitating, and/or terminal illness.
期刊最新文献
Chains. A Phenomenological Study of Clinical Stillbirth Management for Grieving Mothers. How Tangible is an Advance Care Planning Document in Reality? Still Ship at Sea. Disbelief, Distress, & Distrust: Trending Institution Related Emotional Distress During COVID-19.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1