单极钨针电极与特氟龙涂层刮刀电极在肿瘤矫形术中的应用。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Pub Date : 2023-05-15 DOI:10.1186/s10195-023-00704-8
Jan Puetzler, Andrea Ulrike Steinbicker, Jana Santel, Niklas Deventer, Michael Jahn, Alexander Zarbock, Georg Gosheger, Martin Schulze, Dana Janina Jenke
{"title":"单极钨针电极与特氟龙涂层刮刀电极在肿瘤矫形术中的应用。","authors":"Jan Puetzler,&nbsp;Andrea Ulrike Steinbicker,&nbsp;Jana Santel,&nbsp;Niklas Deventer,&nbsp;Michael Jahn,&nbsp;Alexander Zarbock,&nbsp;Georg Gosheger,&nbsp;Martin Schulze,&nbsp;Dana Janina Jenke","doi":"10.1186/s10195-023-00704-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Resection of musculoskeletal tumors and reconstruction with tumor endoprostheses often results in blood loss requiring transfusion of blood products. We assessed the blood-saving potential of using monopolar tungsten needle electrodes and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-coated spatula electrodes (intervention) compared with conventional dissection with sharp instruments and coagulation with uncoated steel electrodes (control).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data of 132 patients (79 interventions, 53 controls) undergoing surgery by one single experienced surgeon in our tertiary referral center between 2012 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative blood loss in the intervention group was reduced by 29% [median (IQR): 700 (400-1200) vs 500 (200-700) ml; p = 0.0043]. Postoperative wound drainage decreased by 41% [median (IQR): 1230 (668-2041) vs 730 (450-1354) ml; p = 0.0080]. Additionally, patients in need of PRBCs during surgery declined from 43% to 15% (23/53 vs 12/79; p = 0.0005), while the transfusion rate after surgery did not change notably. The number of patients in need of revision surgery due to wound healing disorders was low in both groups (control group: 4/53 vs intervention group: 4/79). Only one patient in the control group and two patients in the intervention group underwent revision surgery due to hemorrhage. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (sex, Charlson Comorbidity score, tumor entity).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dissection with tungsten needle electrodes and PTFE-coated spatula electrodes appears an effective surgical blood-saving measure without increased risk of wound healing disorders.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III, retrospective comparative study.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT05164809.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blood-saving dissection with monopolar tungsten needle electrodes and Teflon-coated spatula electrodes in tumor orthopedics.\",\"authors\":\"Jan Puetzler,&nbsp;Andrea Ulrike Steinbicker,&nbsp;Jana Santel,&nbsp;Niklas Deventer,&nbsp;Michael Jahn,&nbsp;Alexander Zarbock,&nbsp;Georg Gosheger,&nbsp;Martin Schulze,&nbsp;Dana Janina Jenke\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s10195-023-00704-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Resection of musculoskeletal tumors and reconstruction with tumor endoprostheses often results in blood loss requiring transfusion of blood products. We assessed the blood-saving potential of using monopolar tungsten needle electrodes and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-coated spatula electrodes (intervention) compared with conventional dissection with sharp instruments and coagulation with uncoated steel electrodes (control).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data of 132 patients (79 interventions, 53 controls) undergoing surgery by one single experienced surgeon in our tertiary referral center between 2012 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative blood loss in the intervention group was reduced by 29% [median (IQR): 700 (400-1200) vs 500 (200-700) ml; p = 0.0043]. Postoperative wound drainage decreased by 41% [median (IQR): 1230 (668-2041) vs 730 (450-1354) ml; p = 0.0080]. Additionally, patients in need of PRBCs during surgery declined from 43% to 15% (23/53 vs 12/79; p = 0.0005), while the transfusion rate after surgery did not change notably. The number of patients in need of revision surgery due to wound healing disorders was low in both groups (control group: 4/53 vs intervention group: 4/79). Only one patient in the control group and two patients in the intervention group underwent revision surgery due to hemorrhage. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (sex, Charlson Comorbidity score, tumor entity).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dissection with tungsten needle electrodes and PTFE-coated spatula electrodes appears an effective surgical blood-saving measure without increased risk of wound healing disorders.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III, retrospective comparative study.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT05164809.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10185722/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-023-00704-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-023-00704-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:切除肌肉骨骼肿瘤和用肿瘤内假体重建往往导致失血,需要输血制品。我们评估了单极钨针电极和聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)涂层刮刀电极(干预)与传统的尖锐器械解剖和未涂层钢电极(对照组)的凝血潜力。方法:我们回顾性分析了2012年至2021年间在我们三级转诊中心由一位经验丰富的外科医生进行手术的132例患者(79例干预,53例对照)的数据。结果:干预组术中出血量减少29%[中位数(IQR): 700 (400-1200) vs 500 (200-700) ml;p = 0.0043]。术后伤口引流减少41%[中位数(IQR): 1230 (668-2041) vs 730 (450-1354) ml;p = 0.0080]。此外,手术中需要红细胞的患者从43%下降到15% (23/53 vs 12/79;P = 0.0005),术后输血率无明显变化。两组因伤口愈合障碍需要翻修手术的患者数量均较低(对照组:4/53,干预组:4/79)。对照组1例,干预组2例因出血行翻修手术。各组之间的基线特征相似(性别、Charlson合并症评分、肿瘤实体)。结论:采用钨针电极和ptfe涂层刮刀电极进行解剖是一种有效的外科止血措施,不会增加伤口愈合障碍的风险。证据等级:III,回顾性比较研究。临床试验注册:该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册。标识符:NCT05164809。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Blood-saving dissection with monopolar tungsten needle electrodes and Teflon-coated spatula electrodes in tumor orthopedics.

Introduction: Resection of musculoskeletal tumors and reconstruction with tumor endoprostheses often results in blood loss requiring transfusion of blood products. We assessed the blood-saving potential of using monopolar tungsten needle electrodes and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-coated spatula electrodes (intervention) compared with conventional dissection with sharp instruments and coagulation with uncoated steel electrodes (control).

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of 132 patients (79 interventions, 53 controls) undergoing surgery by one single experienced surgeon in our tertiary referral center between 2012 and 2021.

Results: Intraoperative blood loss in the intervention group was reduced by 29% [median (IQR): 700 (400-1200) vs 500 (200-700) ml; p = 0.0043]. Postoperative wound drainage decreased by 41% [median (IQR): 1230 (668-2041) vs 730 (450-1354) ml; p = 0.0080]. Additionally, patients in need of PRBCs during surgery declined from 43% to 15% (23/53 vs 12/79; p = 0.0005), while the transfusion rate after surgery did not change notably. The number of patients in need of revision surgery due to wound healing disorders was low in both groups (control group: 4/53 vs intervention group: 4/79). Only one patient in the control group and two patients in the intervention group underwent revision surgery due to hemorrhage. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (sex, Charlson Comorbidity score, tumor entity).

Conclusion: Dissection with tungsten needle electrodes and PTFE-coated spatula electrodes appears an effective surgical blood-saving measure without increased risk of wound healing disorders.

Level of evidence: III, retrospective comparative study.

Clinical trial registration: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT05164809.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, the official open access peer-reviewed journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, publishes original papers reporting basic or clinical research in the field of orthopaedic and traumatologic surgery, as well as systematic reviews, brief communications, case reports and letters to the Editor. Narrative instructional reviews and commentaries to original articles may be commissioned by Editors from eminent colleagues. The Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology aims to be an international forum for the communication and exchange of ideas concerning the various aspects of orthopaedics and musculoskeletal trauma.
期刊最新文献
Is there a difference in pelvic and femoral morphology in early periprosthetic femoral fracture in cementless short stem total hip arthroplasty via an anterolateral approach? Differences in the effectiveness of leukocyte-rich platelet-rich plasma compared with leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of rotator cuff surgery: an umbrella review of meta-analyses. Can a single question replace patient-reported outcomes in the follow-up of elbow arthroplasty? A validation study. Are the costs of 3D printing for surgical procedures yet to be definitively assessed? The extensive use of 3D printing in trauma does not yet fit the value-based healthcare era.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1