一个多步骤的中介模型研究了长时间暴露治疗中咨询如何影响创伤后应激障碍治疗结果。

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychological Services Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-08 DOI:10.1037/ser0000769
Carmen P McLean, Edna B Foa, Nadia Malek, Stacey Young-McCaughan, Alan L Peterson, Brenda S Hanson, Ivett J Lillard, Thomas J Patterson, Julio Rosado, Valerie Scott, David Rosenfield
{"title":"一个多步骤的中介模型研究了长时间暴露治疗中咨询如何影响创伤后应激障碍治疗结果。","authors":"Carmen P McLean, Edna B Foa, Nadia Malek, Stacey Young-McCaughan, Alan L Peterson, Brenda S Hanson, Ivett J Lillard, Thomas J Patterson, Julio Rosado, Valerie Scott, David Rosenfield","doi":"10.1037/ser0000769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prolonged exposure therapy (PE) is an evidence-based psychotherapy (EBP) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) that is underutilized in the military health system. Previous research suggests that postworkshop consultation is important for successful implementation. However, little is known about how consultation may relate to EBP adoption or patient outcomes. The present study addressed these gaps by examining associations between consultation, provider self-efficacy, use of PE, and patient outcomes using a multistep mediation model. This study used data from Foa et al. (2020), a two-armed randomized implementation trial comparing two PE training models: standard training (workshop only) and extended training (workshop + 6-8 months of postworkshop expert consultation) at three U.S. Army sites. Participants were patients with PTSD (<i>N</i> = 242) receiving care from the participating providers (<i>N</i> = 103). Providers who received extended training reported greater PE self-efficacy compared to standard training providers, but self-efficacy was unrelated to their use of PE components or to patient outcomes. Extended training providers used more PE components and had superior patient outcomes than standard training providers, and patient outcomes were mediated by the use of PE components. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that EBP consultation leads to improved clinical outcomes for patients through increased use of the EBP. PE adoption (i.e., use of PE components in therapy) was not explained by increases in self-efficacy among providers who received extended training. Therefore, future research should assess how other factors may influence provider behavior in implementing EBPs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"214-223"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10630526/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multistep mediation model examining how consultation in prolonged exposure therapy affects PTSD treatment outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Carmen P McLean, Edna B Foa, Nadia Malek, Stacey Young-McCaughan, Alan L Peterson, Brenda S Hanson, Ivett J Lillard, Thomas J Patterson, Julio Rosado, Valerie Scott, David Rosenfield\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ser0000769\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Prolonged exposure therapy (PE) is an evidence-based psychotherapy (EBP) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) that is underutilized in the military health system. Previous research suggests that postworkshop consultation is important for successful implementation. However, little is known about how consultation may relate to EBP adoption or patient outcomes. The present study addressed these gaps by examining associations between consultation, provider self-efficacy, use of PE, and patient outcomes using a multistep mediation model. This study used data from Foa et al. (2020), a two-armed randomized implementation trial comparing two PE training models: standard training (workshop only) and extended training (workshop + 6-8 months of postworkshop expert consultation) at three U.S. Army sites. Participants were patients with PTSD (<i>N</i> = 242) receiving care from the participating providers (<i>N</i> = 103). Providers who received extended training reported greater PE self-efficacy compared to standard training providers, but self-efficacy was unrelated to their use of PE components or to patient outcomes. Extended training providers used more PE components and had superior patient outcomes than standard training providers, and patient outcomes were mediated by the use of PE components. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that EBP consultation leads to improved clinical outcomes for patients through increased use of the EBP. PE adoption (i.e., use of PE components in therapy) was not explained by increases in self-efficacy among providers who received extended training. Therefore, future research should assess how other factors may influence provider behavior in implementing EBPs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Services\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"214-223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10630526/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000769\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000769","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期暴露治疗(PE)是一种针对创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的循证心理治疗(EBP),在军事卫生系统中未得到充分利用。先前的研究表明,研讨会后的协商对成功实施很重要。然而,对于咨询如何与循证医学的采用或患者结果相关,我们知之甚少。本研究通过使用多步骤中介模型检查咨询、提供者自我效能感、体育锻炼的使用和患者结果之间的关联,解决了这些差距。这项研究使用了Foa等人的数据。(2020),这是一项两臂随机实施试验,比较了两种体育训练模式:标准训练(仅限研讨会)和扩展训练(研讨会+6-8个月的会后专家咨询),在三个美国陆军基地进行。参与者是接受参与提供者护理的创伤后应激障碍患者(N=242)(N=103)。与标准培训提供者相比,接受延长培训的提供者报告了更高的体育自我效能感,但自我效能感与他们使用体育成分或患者结果无关。与标准培训提供者相比,扩展培训提供者使用了更多的PE成分,并具有更好的患者结果,并且患者结果是通过使用PE成分来调节的。据我们所知,这是第一项证明循证医学咨询通过增加循证医学的使用来改善患者临床结果的研究。采用体育锻炼(即在治疗中使用体育锻炼成分)并不能通过接受长期培训的提供者自我效能感的提高来解释。因此,未来的研究应该评估其他因素如何影响实施EBP的提供者行为。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A multistep mediation model examining how consultation in prolonged exposure therapy affects PTSD treatment outcomes.

Prolonged exposure therapy (PE) is an evidence-based psychotherapy (EBP) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) that is underutilized in the military health system. Previous research suggests that postworkshop consultation is important for successful implementation. However, little is known about how consultation may relate to EBP adoption or patient outcomes. The present study addressed these gaps by examining associations between consultation, provider self-efficacy, use of PE, and patient outcomes using a multistep mediation model. This study used data from Foa et al. (2020), a two-armed randomized implementation trial comparing two PE training models: standard training (workshop only) and extended training (workshop + 6-8 months of postworkshop expert consultation) at three U.S. Army sites. Participants were patients with PTSD (N = 242) receiving care from the participating providers (N = 103). Providers who received extended training reported greater PE self-efficacy compared to standard training providers, but self-efficacy was unrelated to their use of PE components or to patient outcomes. Extended training providers used more PE components and had superior patient outcomes than standard training providers, and patient outcomes were mediated by the use of PE components. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that EBP consultation leads to improved clinical outcomes for patients through increased use of the EBP. PE adoption (i.e., use of PE components in therapy) was not explained by increases in self-efficacy among providers who received extended training. Therefore, future research should assess how other factors may influence provider behavior in implementing EBPs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
期刊最新文献
It gives you a really great feeling, knowing that what you are doing is making somebody's day: Provider perspectives on implementing the individualized positive psychosocial interaction. Was training enough? Examining the implementation of evidence-based psychotherapies for depression in Veterans Health Administration. A systematic review of mental health stigma reduction trainings for law enforcement officers. Cultural Spanish adaptation, factor structure, and reliability of implementation science instruments for suicide prevention. Examining mental health engagement among veterans diagnosed with serious mental illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1