阅读困难双语学习者的总结性写作表现

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Annals of Dyslexia Pub Date : 2022-06-24 DOI:10.1007/s11881-022-00258-0
Miao Li, Jessica Chan, John R. Kirby
{"title":"阅读困难双语学习者的总结性写作表现","authors":"Miao Li,&nbsp;Jessica Chan,&nbsp;John R. Kirby","doi":"10.1007/s11881-022-00258-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Summary writing is an important tactic for learning from text and the summaries provide information on students’ comprehension and learning processes. We investigated the nature of the summaries produced by bilingual adolescents, and whether their summaries were related to their reading abilities in their first and second languages. In each language, we examined the performance of students identified as typically developing, poor decoders, or poor comprehenders. Participants were 246 grade 8 students enrolled in English immersion programs in China. Measures included English word reading and reading comprehension, Chinese word reading and reading comprehension, and nonverbal ability. Students’ text-absent summaries of an English 254-word expository passage were analyzed for the number of themes, main ideas, important details, and unimportant details. Using latent profile analysis, participants were identified as typical readers (TR, <i>n</i> = 123), poor decoders (PD, <i>n</i> = 74), or poor comprehenders (PC, <i>n</i> = 49) in English, and TR (<i>n</i> = 129), PD (<i>n</i> = 74), or PC (<i>n</i> = 43) in Chinese, based on word reading and reading comprehension in both English and Chinese. MANCOVA results showed that after controlling for nonverbal ability, in the English-defined groups, the TR group outperformed PD and PC on themes, main ideas, and important details; in the Chinese-defined groups, the TR group outperformed PD and PC on themes, TR performed better than PC on main ideas and important details, and PD outperformed PC on main ideas. Discussion focuses on the difficulties faced by bilingual students with reading difficulties and on the potential of summary writing instruction to improve their comprehension and learning processes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":"73 1","pages":"109 - 129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11881-022-00258-0.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The summary writing performance of bilingual learners with reading difficulties\",\"authors\":\"Miao Li,&nbsp;Jessica Chan,&nbsp;John R. Kirby\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11881-022-00258-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Summary writing is an important tactic for learning from text and the summaries provide information on students’ comprehension and learning processes. We investigated the nature of the summaries produced by bilingual adolescents, and whether their summaries were related to their reading abilities in their first and second languages. In each language, we examined the performance of students identified as typically developing, poor decoders, or poor comprehenders. Participants were 246 grade 8 students enrolled in English immersion programs in China. Measures included English word reading and reading comprehension, Chinese word reading and reading comprehension, and nonverbal ability. Students’ text-absent summaries of an English 254-word expository passage were analyzed for the number of themes, main ideas, important details, and unimportant details. Using latent profile analysis, participants were identified as typical readers (TR, <i>n</i> = 123), poor decoders (PD, <i>n</i> = 74), or poor comprehenders (PC, <i>n</i> = 49) in English, and TR (<i>n</i> = 129), PD (<i>n</i> = 74), or PC (<i>n</i> = 43) in Chinese, based on word reading and reading comprehension in both English and Chinese. MANCOVA results showed that after controlling for nonverbal ability, in the English-defined groups, the TR group outperformed PD and PC on themes, main ideas, and important details; in the Chinese-defined groups, the TR group outperformed PD and PC on themes, TR performed better than PC on main ideas and important details, and PD outperformed PC on main ideas. Discussion focuses on the difficulties faced by bilingual students with reading difficulties and on the potential of summary writing instruction to improve their comprehension and learning processes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Dyslexia\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"109 - 129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11881-022-00258-0.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Dyslexia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11881-022-00258-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Dyslexia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11881-022-00258-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要写作是从课文中学习的一种重要策略,摘要提供了学生理解和学习过程的信息。我们调查了双语青少年撰写的摘要的性质,以及他们的摘要是否与他们的第一语言和第二语言阅读能力有关。在每种语言中,我们都考察了被认定为典型的发展型、解码能力差或理解能力差的学生的表现。参与者是246名在中国参加英语浸入式课程的八年级学生。测量包括英语单词阅读和理解、汉语单词阅读和阅读理解以及非语言能力。对一篇254字的英语说明文的缺文摘要进行了主题数量、大意、重要细节和不重要细节的分析。使用潜在概况分析,参与者被确定为典型的读者(TR,n = 123)、较差的解码器(PD,n = 74),或理解能力差(PC,n = 49)和TR(n = 129)、PD(n = 74)或PC(n = 43)。MANCOVA结果显示,在控制非语言能力后,在英语定义组中,TR组在主题、主要思想和重要细节方面优于PD组和PC组;在中国定义的组中,TR组在主题方面优于PD和PC,TR在主要思想和重要细节方面优于PC,PD在主要思想方面优于PC。讨论的重点是有阅读困难的双语学生所面临的困难,以及总结写作教学对提高他们的理解和学习过程的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The summary writing performance of bilingual learners with reading difficulties

Summary writing is an important tactic for learning from text and the summaries provide information on students’ comprehension and learning processes. We investigated the nature of the summaries produced by bilingual adolescents, and whether their summaries were related to their reading abilities in their first and second languages. In each language, we examined the performance of students identified as typically developing, poor decoders, or poor comprehenders. Participants were 246 grade 8 students enrolled in English immersion programs in China. Measures included English word reading and reading comprehension, Chinese word reading and reading comprehension, and nonverbal ability. Students’ text-absent summaries of an English 254-word expository passage were analyzed for the number of themes, main ideas, important details, and unimportant details. Using latent profile analysis, participants were identified as typical readers (TR, n = 123), poor decoders (PD, n = 74), or poor comprehenders (PC, n = 49) in English, and TR (n = 129), PD (n = 74), or PC (n = 43) in Chinese, based on word reading and reading comprehension in both English and Chinese. MANCOVA results showed that after controlling for nonverbal ability, in the English-defined groups, the TR group outperformed PD and PC on themes, main ideas, and important details; in the Chinese-defined groups, the TR group outperformed PD and PC on themes, TR performed better than PC on main ideas and important details, and PD outperformed PC on main ideas. Discussion focuses on the difficulties faced by bilingual students with reading difficulties and on the potential of summary writing instruction to improve their comprehension and learning processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Dyslexia
Annals of Dyslexia Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Annals of Dyslexia is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the scientific study of dyslexia, its comorbid conditions; and theory-based practices on remediation, and intervention of dyslexia and related areas of written language disorders including spelling, composing and mathematics. Primary consideration for publication is given to original empirical studies, significant review, and well-documented reports of evidence-based effective practices. Only original papers are considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Foveal crowding in children with developmental dyslexia. Bridging the Gap in Adult Dyslexia Research: Assessing the Efficacy of a Linguistic Intervention on Literacy Skills. Dyslexia in the 21st century: revisiting the consensus definition Exploring the feasibility of implementing the SPELL-Links to Reading and Writing intervention. Identifying students with dyslexia: exploration of current assessment methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1