[第二次大流行浪潮中采取Covid-19防护措施的养老院的社会参与?处方与调查的联动]。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING Pflege Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1024/1012-5302/a000898
Annabell Gangnus, Christian Hering, Raphael Kohl, Clara-Sophia Henson, Antje Schwinger, Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen, Adelheid Kuhlmey, Paul Gellert
{"title":"[第二次大流行浪潮中采取Covid-19防护措施的养老院的社会参与?处方与调查的联动]。","authors":"Annabell Gangnus,&nbsp;Christian Hering,&nbsp;Raphael Kohl,&nbsp;Clara-Sophia Henson,&nbsp;Antje Schwinger,&nbsp;Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen,&nbsp;Adelheid Kuhlmey,&nbsp;Paul Gellert","doi":"10.1024/1012-5302/a000898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social participation in nursing homes with Covid-19 protection measures in the second pandemic wave? Linkage of prescriptions and survey <b>Abstract:</b> <i>Background:</i> The implementation of protective measures in nursing homes during the Covid-19 pandemic was accompanied with the loss of social participation opportunities in the first Covid-19 wave; this has been inadequately studied for the second Covid wave. <i>Aim:</i> To evaluate the association of protective measures and social participation restrictions for the second Covid-19 wave to develop recommendations for action. <i>Methods:</i> Mixed-methods online surve y of nursing home managers (<i>n</i> = 873) in the second wave. Binary logistic generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the likelihood of the elimination of social participation services in nursing homes as a function of legal protections. Open-ended responses about maintaining social participation were content analyzed (<i>n</i> = 1042). <i>Results:</i> More than one in two nursing home managers reported prohibited group events (66,6%), and more than one in three prohibited creative activities (42,3%). Visitation restrictions (85,2%) were common in the second wave. The loss of participation services and the protective measures were significantly associated. Qualitative data showed that, for example, the acquisition of mobile shopping stores were opportunities to counteract the social exclusion of the residents. <i>Discussion:</i> The association between the loss of social participation services with the implementation of protective measures was clearly pronounced. Nursing practitioners should focus on enabling social participation whilst guaranteeing protection against infection best possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":54625,"journal":{"name":"Pflege","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Social participation in nursing homes with Covid-19 protection measures in the second pandemic wave? Linkage of prescriptions and survey].\",\"authors\":\"Annabell Gangnus,&nbsp;Christian Hering,&nbsp;Raphael Kohl,&nbsp;Clara-Sophia Henson,&nbsp;Antje Schwinger,&nbsp;Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen,&nbsp;Adelheid Kuhlmey,&nbsp;Paul Gellert\",\"doi\":\"10.1024/1012-5302/a000898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Social participation in nursing homes with Covid-19 protection measures in the second pandemic wave? Linkage of prescriptions and survey <b>Abstract:</b> <i>Background:</i> The implementation of protective measures in nursing homes during the Covid-19 pandemic was accompanied with the loss of social participation opportunities in the first Covid-19 wave; this has been inadequately studied for the second Covid wave. <i>Aim:</i> To evaluate the association of protective measures and social participation restrictions for the second Covid-19 wave to develop recommendations for action. <i>Methods:</i> Mixed-methods online surve y of nursing home managers (<i>n</i> = 873) in the second wave. Binary logistic generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the likelihood of the elimination of social participation services in nursing homes as a function of legal protections. Open-ended responses about maintaining social participation were content analyzed (<i>n</i> = 1042). <i>Results:</i> More than one in two nursing home managers reported prohibited group events (66,6%), and more than one in three prohibited creative activities (42,3%). Visitation restrictions (85,2%) were common in the second wave. The loss of participation services and the protective measures were significantly associated. Qualitative data showed that, for example, the acquisition of mobile shopping stores were opportunities to counteract the social exclusion of the residents. <i>Discussion:</i> The association between the loss of social participation services with the implementation of protective measures was clearly pronounced. Nursing practitioners should focus on enabling social participation whilst guaranteeing protection against infection best possible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pflege\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pflege\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302/a000898\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pflege","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302/a000898","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在第二次大流行浪潮中采取Covid-19防护措施的养老院的社会参与?摘要:背景:2019冠状病毒病(Covid-19)大流行期间养老院防护措施的实施伴随着第一波疫情中社会参与机会的丧失;这一点在第二波疫情中没有得到充分研究。目的:评估第二波Covid-19疫情中防护措施与社会参与限制之间的关系,以制定行动建议。方法:对第二波养老院管理人员(873名)进行混合方法在线调查。使用二元逻辑广义估计方程来评估消除养老院社会参与服务作为法律保护功能的可能性。对保持社会参与的开放式回答进行内容分析(n = 1042)。结果:超过1 / 2的养老院管理者报告禁止集体活动(66.6%),超过1 / 3的养老院管理者报告禁止创造性活动(42.3%)。探视限制(85.2%)在第二波中很常见。参与服务的丧失与保护措施显著相关。定性数据表明,例如,收购移动购物商店是抵消居民社会排斥的机会。讨论:社会参与服务的丧失与保护措施的执行之间的联系是显而易见的。护理从业人员应注重促进社会参与,同时尽可能确保预防感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Social participation in nursing homes with Covid-19 protection measures in the second pandemic wave? Linkage of prescriptions and survey].

Social participation in nursing homes with Covid-19 protection measures in the second pandemic wave? Linkage of prescriptions and survey Abstract: Background: The implementation of protective measures in nursing homes during the Covid-19 pandemic was accompanied with the loss of social participation opportunities in the first Covid-19 wave; this has been inadequately studied for the second Covid wave. Aim: To evaluate the association of protective measures and social participation restrictions for the second Covid-19 wave to develop recommendations for action. Methods: Mixed-methods online surve y of nursing home managers (n = 873) in the second wave. Binary logistic generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the likelihood of the elimination of social participation services in nursing homes as a function of legal protections. Open-ended responses about maintaining social participation were content analyzed (n = 1042). Results: More than one in two nursing home managers reported prohibited group events (66,6%), and more than one in three prohibited creative activities (42,3%). Visitation restrictions (85,2%) were common in the second wave. The loss of participation services and the protective measures were significantly associated. Qualitative data showed that, for example, the acquisition of mobile shopping stores were opportunities to counteract the social exclusion of the residents. Discussion: The association between the loss of social participation services with the implementation of protective measures was clearly pronounced. Nursing practitioners should focus on enabling social participation whilst guaranteeing protection against infection best possible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pflege
Pflege NURSING-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pflege ist die erste unabhängige wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für die Gesundheits- und Krankenpflege im deutschen Sprachbereich. Sie trägt zur Entwicklung der Pflegewissenschaft sowie zur Qualität der Pflege in der Praxis bei. Die Zeitschrift versteht sich als umfassendes Forum, in welchem die sich rasch entwickelnden Bereiche der Pflegeforschung, -theorie und -praxis sowie der Ausbildung, des Managements, der Ethik, Geschichte und Politik der Pflege diskutiert werden können. Zusammenfassungen von Forschungsberichten und Mitteilungen aus der internationalen Pflegeszene, Buchbesprechungen und der internationale Kongresskalender ermöglichen der Leserschaft, sich einen Überblick über das aktuelle Geschehen zu verschaffen, sich bezüglich berufsspezifischer Literatur auf dem Laufenden zu halten, um somit die Weiterbildung gezielt zu gestalten. Pflege publiziert Beiträge, die eine hohe Relevanz für Praxis, Forschung, Theorie, Ausbildung, Ethik, Geschichte, Politik und das Management in der Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum haben. Manuskripte ohne Bezug zur Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum werden abgelehnt.
期刊最新文献
[Development and piloting of nurse-led mHealth care for heart failure patients: A feasibility study]. [On the effectiveness of a new advisory service for parents of children in need of care: a controlled study]. Ongoing and emerging issues for residential long-term care in the context of Covid-19. Primary nursing in the intensive care unit. [The physical and mental health of home care recipients: A quantitative secondary data analysis].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1