脂肪组织来源细胞群成骨能力和成骨诱导的比较。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1089/ten.TEC.2023.0039
Johanna F A Husch, Laura Coquelin, Nathalie Chevallier, Dorien Tiemessen, Egbert Oosterwijk, René van Rheden, Charlotte Woud, Jurriaan Vossen, Sander C G Leeuwenburgh, Jeroen J J P van den Beucken
{"title":"脂肪组织来源细胞群成骨能力和成骨诱导的比较。","authors":"Johanna F A Husch,&nbsp;Laura Coquelin,&nbsp;Nathalie Chevallier,&nbsp;Dorien Tiemessen,&nbsp;Egbert Oosterwijk,&nbsp;René van Rheden,&nbsp;Charlotte Woud,&nbsp;Jurriaan Vossen,&nbsp;Sander C G Leeuwenburgh,&nbsp;Jeroen J J P van den Beucken","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEC.2023.0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stromal vascular fraction (SVF) is the primary isolate obtained after enzymatic digestion of adipose tissue that contains various cell types. Its successful application for cell-based construct preparation in an intra-operative setting for clinical bone augmentation and regeneration has been previously reported. However, the performance of SVF-based constructs compared with traditional <i>ex vivo</i> expanded adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (ATMSCs) remains unclear and direct comparative analyses are scarce. Consequently, we here aimed at comparing the <i>in vitro</i> osteogenic differentiation capacity of donor-matched SVF versus ATMSCs as well as their osteoinductive capacity. Human adipose tissue from nine different donors was used to isolate SVF, which was further purified via plastic-adherence to obtain donor-matched ATMSCs. Both cell populations were immunophenotypically characterized for mesenchymal stromal cell, endothelial, and hematopoietic markers after isolation and immunocytochemical staining was used to identify different cell types during prolonged cell culture. Based on normalization using plastic-adherence fraction determination, SVF and ATMSCs were seeded and cultured in osteogenic differentiation medium for 28 days. Further, SVF and ATMSCs were seeded onto devitalized bovine bone granules and subcutaneously implanted into nude mice. After 42 days of implantation, granules were retrieved, histologically processed, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) to assess ectopic bone formation. The ATMSCs were shown to be a homogenous cell population during cell culture, whereas SVF cultures consisted of multiple cell types. All donor-matched comparisons showed either accelerated or stronger mineralization for SVF cultures <i>in vitro</i>. However, neither SVF nor ATMSCs loaded on devitalized bone granules induced ectopic bone formation on subcutaneous implantation, as opposed to control granules loaded with bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), which triggered ectopic bone formation with 100% incidence. Despite the observed lack of osteoinduction, our findings provide important <i>in vitro</i> evidence on the osteogenic superiority of intra-operatively available SVF as compared with donor-matched ATMSCs. Consequently, further studies should focus on optimizing the efficacy of these cell populations for implementation in orthotopic bone fracture or defect treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":23154,"journal":{"name":"Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Osteogenic Capacity and Osteoinduction of Adipose Tissue-Derived Cell Populations.\",\"authors\":\"Johanna F A Husch,&nbsp;Laura Coquelin,&nbsp;Nathalie Chevallier,&nbsp;Dorien Tiemessen,&nbsp;Egbert Oosterwijk,&nbsp;René van Rheden,&nbsp;Charlotte Woud,&nbsp;Jurriaan Vossen,&nbsp;Sander C G Leeuwenburgh,&nbsp;Jeroen J J P van den Beucken\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/ten.TEC.2023.0039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Stromal vascular fraction (SVF) is the primary isolate obtained after enzymatic digestion of adipose tissue that contains various cell types. Its successful application for cell-based construct preparation in an intra-operative setting for clinical bone augmentation and regeneration has been previously reported. However, the performance of SVF-based constructs compared with traditional <i>ex vivo</i> expanded adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (ATMSCs) remains unclear and direct comparative analyses are scarce. Consequently, we here aimed at comparing the <i>in vitro</i> osteogenic differentiation capacity of donor-matched SVF versus ATMSCs as well as their osteoinductive capacity. Human adipose tissue from nine different donors was used to isolate SVF, which was further purified via plastic-adherence to obtain donor-matched ATMSCs. Both cell populations were immunophenotypically characterized for mesenchymal stromal cell, endothelial, and hematopoietic markers after isolation and immunocytochemical staining was used to identify different cell types during prolonged cell culture. Based on normalization using plastic-adherence fraction determination, SVF and ATMSCs were seeded and cultured in osteogenic differentiation medium for 28 days. Further, SVF and ATMSCs were seeded onto devitalized bovine bone granules and subcutaneously implanted into nude mice. After 42 days of implantation, granules were retrieved, histologically processed, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) to assess ectopic bone formation. The ATMSCs were shown to be a homogenous cell population during cell culture, whereas SVF cultures consisted of multiple cell types. All donor-matched comparisons showed either accelerated or stronger mineralization for SVF cultures <i>in vitro</i>. However, neither SVF nor ATMSCs loaded on devitalized bone granules induced ectopic bone formation on subcutaneous implantation, as opposed to control granules loaded with bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), which triggered ectopic bone formation with 100% incidence. Despite the observed lack of osteoinduction, our findings provide important <i>in vitro</i> evidence on the osteogenic superiority of intra-operatively available SVF as compared with donor-matched ATMSCs. Consequently, further studies should focus on optimizing the efficacy of these cell populations for implementation in orthotopic bone fracture or defect treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2023.0039\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2023.0039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

基质血管组分(SVF)是酶解含有多种细胞类型的脂肪组织后获得的初级分离物。它成功地应用于手术中临床骨增强和再生的细胞构建制备中,此前已有报道。然而,基于svf的构建物与传统的体外扩张脂肪组织源性间充质基质细胞(ATMSCs)的性能仍不清楚,也缺乏直接的比较分析。因此,我们在这里旨在比较供体匹配的SVF与ATMSCs的体外成骨分化能力以及它们的成骨诱导能力。使用来自9个不同供体的人脂肪组织分离SVF,并通过塑料粘附进一步纯化以获得供体匹配的ATMSCs。两种细胞群在分离后均具有间充质基质细胞、内皮细胞和造血标志物的免疫表型特征,并在长时间细胞培养过程中使用免疫细胞化学染色来鉴定不同的细胞类型。在塑料粘附分数测定归一化的基础上,将SVF和ATMSCs植入成骨分化培养基中培养28天。将SVF和ATMSCs分别植入失活牛骨颗粒,并皮下植入裸鼠体内。植入42天后,取出颗粒,进行组织学处理,并用苏木精和伊红(HE)染色评估异位骨形成。在细胞培养过程中,ATMSCs被证明是一个均匀的细胞群,而SVF培养由多种细胞类型组成。所有与供体匹配的比较显示体外SVF培养物的矿化加速或更强。然而,负载失活骨颗粒的SVF和ATMSCs在皮下植入时均未诱导异位骨形成,而负载骨形态发生蛋白-2 (BMP-2)的对照颗粒则以100%的发生率诱发异位骨形成。尽管观察到缺乏骨诱导作用,但我们的研究结果为术中可用的SVF与供体匹配的ATMSCs相比具有成骨优势提供了重要的体外证据。因此,进一步的研究应侧重于优化这些细胞群在原位骨折或骨缺损治疗中的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Osteogenic Capacity and Osteoinduction of Adipose Tissue-Derived Cell Populations.

Stromal vascular fraction (SVF) is the primary isolate obtained after enzymatic digestion of adipose tissue that contains various cell types. Its successful application for cell-based construct preparation in an intra-operative setting for clinical bone augmentation and regeneration has been previously reported. However, the performance of SVF-based constructs compared with traditional ex vivo expanded adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (ATMSCs) remains unclear and direct comparative analyses are scarce. Consequently, we here aimed at comparing the in vitro osteogenic differentiation capacity of donor-matched SVF versus ATMSCs as well as their osteoinductive capacity. Human adipose tissue from nine different donors was used to isolate SVF, which was further purified via plastic-adherence to obtain donor-matched ATMSCs. Both cell populations were immunophenotypically characterized for mesenchymal stromal cell, endothelial, and hematopoietic markers after isolation and immunocytochemical staining was used to identify different cell types during prolonged cell culture. Based on normalization using plastic-adherence fraction determination, SVF and ATMSCs were seeded and cultured in osteogenic differentiation medium for 28 days. Further, SVF and ATMSCs were seeded onto devitalized bovine bone granules and subcutaneously implanted into nude mice. After 42 days of implantation, granules were retrieved, histologically processed, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) to assess ectopic bone formation. The ATMSCs were shown to be a homogenous cell population during cell culture, whereas SVF cultures consisted of multiple cell types. All donor-matched comparisons showed either accelerated or stronger mineralization for SVF cultures in vitro. However, neither SVF nor ATMSCs loaded on devitalized bone granules induced ectopic bone formation on subcutaneous implantation, as opposed to control granules loaded with bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), which triggered ectopic bone formation with 100% incidence. Despite the observed lack of osteoinduction, our findings provide important in vitro evidence on the osteogenic superiority of intra-operatively available SVF as compared with donor-matched ATMSCs. Consequently, further studies should focus on optimizing the efficacy of these cell populations for implementation in orthotopic bone fracture or defect treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods
Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
136
期刊介绍: Tissue Engineering is the preeminent, biomedical journal advancing the field with cutting-edge research and applications that repair or regenerate portions or whole tissues. This multidisciplinary journal brings together the principles of engineering and life sciences in the creation of artificial tissues and regenerative medicine. Tissue Engineering is divided into three parts, providing a central forum for groundbreaking scientific research and developments of clinical applications from leading experts in the field that will enable the functional replacement of tissues. Tissue Engineering Methods (Part C) presents innovative tools and assays in scaffold development, stem cells and biologically active molecules to advance the field and to support clinical translation. Part C publishes monthly.
期刊最新文献
Autoinduction-Based Quantification of In Situ TGF-β Activity in Native and Engineered Cartilage. Development and Biocompatibility Assessment of Decellularized Porcine Uterine Extracellular Matrix-Derived Grafts. Synthetic Bone Blocks Produced by Additive Manufacturing in the Repair of Critical Bone Defects. Tissue-Engineered Oral Epithelium for Dental Material Testing: Toward In Vitro Biomimetic Models. Growth Differentiation Factor 5-Induced Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Enhance Tendon Healing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1