基于家庭冷冻切片诊断报告的远程数字病理学验证

Rajiv Kumar Kaushal, Subhash Yadav, Ayushi Sahay, Nupur Karnik, Tushar Agrawal, Vinayak Dave, Nikhil Singh, Ashish Shah, Sangeeta B. Desai
{"title":"基于家庭冷冻切片诊断报告的远程数字病理学验证","authors":"Rajiv Kumar Kaushal,&nbsp;Subhash Yadav,&nbsp;Ayushi Sahay,&nbsp;Nupur Karnik,&nbsp;Tushar Agrawal,&nbsp;Vinayak Dave,&nbsp;Nikhil Singh,&nbsp;Ashish Shah,&nbsp;Sangeeta B. Desai","doi":"10.1016/j.jpi.2023.100312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite the promising applications of whole-slide imaging (WSI) for frozen section (FS) diagnosis, its adoption for remote reporting is limited.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the feasibility and performance of home-based remote digital consultation for FS diagnosis.</p></div><div><h3>Material &amp; Method</h3><p>Cases accessioned beyond regular working hours (5 pm–10 pm) were reported simultaneously using optical microscopy (OM) and WSI. Validation of WSI for FS diagnosis from a remote site, i.e. home, was performed by 5 pathologists. Cases were scanned using a portable scanner (Grundium Ocus®40) and previewed on consumer-grade computer devices through a web-based browser (<span>http://grundium.net</span><svg><path></path></svg>). Clinical data and diagnostic reports were shared through a google spreadsheet. The diagnostic concordance, inter- and intra-observer agreement for FS diagnosis by WSI versus OM, and turnaround time (TAT), were recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The overall diagnostic accuracy for OM and WSI (from home) was 98.2% (range 97%–100%) and 97.6% (range 95%–99%), respectively, when compared with the reference standard. Almost perfect inter-observer (k = 0.993) and intra-observer (k = 0.987) agreement for WSI was observed by 4 pathologists. Pathologists used consumer-grade laptops/desktops with an average screen size of 14.58 inches (range = 12.3–17.7 inches) and a network speed of 64 megabits per second (range: 10–90 Mbps). The mean diagnostic assessment time per case for OM and WSI was 1:48 min and 5:54 min, respectively. Mean TAT of 27.27 min per case was observed using WSI from home. Seamless connectivity was observed in approximately 75% of cases.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study validates the role of WSI for remote FS diagnosis for its safe and efficient adoption in clinical use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/81/ac/main.PMC10192998.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Remote Digital Pathology based diagnostic reporting of Frozen Sections from home\",\"authors\":\"Rajiv Kumar Kaushal,&nbsp;Subhash Yadav,&nbsp;Ayushi Sahay,&nbsp;Nupur Karnik,&nbsp;Tushar Agrawal,&nbsp;Vinayak Dave,&nbsp;Nikhil Singh,&nbsp;Ashish Shah,&nbsp;Sangeeta B. Desai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpi.2023.100312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite the promising applications of whole-slide imaging (WSI) for frozen section (FS) diagnosis, its adoption for remote reporting is limited.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the feasibility and performance of home-based remote digital consultation for FS diagnosis.</p></div><div><h3>Material &amp; Method</h3><p>Cases accessioned beyond regular working hours (5 pm–10 pm) were reported simultaneously using optical microscopy (OM) and WSI. Validation of WSI for FS diagnosis from a remote site, i.e. home, was performed by 5 pathologists. Cases were scanned using a portable scanner (Grundium Ocus®40) and previewed on consumer-grade computer devices through a web-based browser (<span>http://grundium.net</span><svg><path></path></svg>). Clinical data and diagnostic reports were shared through a google spreadsheet. The diagnostic concordance, inter- and intra-observer agreement for FS diagnosis by WSI versus OM, and turnaround time (TAT), were recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The overall diagnostic accuracy for OM and WSI (from home) was 98.2% (range 97%–100%) and 97.6% (range 95%–99%), respectively, when compared with the reference standard. Almost perfect inter-observer (k = 0.993) and intra-observer (k = 0.987) agreement for WSI was observed by 4 pathologists. Pathologists used consumer-grade laptops/desktops with an average screen size of 14.58 inches (range = 12.3–17.7 inches) and a network speed of 64 megabits per second (range: 10–90 Mbps). The mean diagnostic assessment time per case for OM and WSI was 1:48 min and 5:54 min, respectively. Mean TAT of 27.27 min per case was observed using WSI from home. Seamless connectivity was observed in approximately 75% of cases.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study validates the role of WSI for remote FS diagnosis for its safe and efficient adoption in clinical use.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/81/ac/main.PMC10192998.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353923001268\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353923001268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管全切片成像(WSI)在冷冻切片(FS)诊断中的应用前景广阔,但其在远程报告中的应用仍然有限。目的探讨家庭远程数字会诊在FS诊断中的可行性和效果。材料,方法采用光学显微镜(OM)和WSI同时对正常工作时间(5pm - 10pm)以外的病例进行报告。5名病理学家从远处(即家中)验证WSI对FS的诊断。使用便携式扫描仪(Grundium Ocus®40)扫描病例,并通过基于网络的浏览器(http://grundium.net)在消费级计算机设备上预览病例。临床数据和诊断报告通过谷歌电子表格共享。记录WSI与OM诊断FS的诊断一致性、观察者之间和观察者内部的一致性以及周转时间(TAT)。结果与参考标准相比,OM和WSI(家庭)的总体诊断准确率分别为98.2%(97% ~ 100%)和97.6%(95% ~ 99%)。4名病理学家观察到WSI的观察者间(k = 0.993)和观察者内(k = 0.987)几乎完全一致。病理学家使用的是消费级笔记本电脑/台式机,平均屏幕尺寸为14.58英寸(范围为12.3-17.7英寸),网络速度为每秒64兆比特(范围:10-90 Mbps)。每例OM和WSI的平均诊断评估时间分别为1:48 min和5:54 min。家中WSI观察到平均TAT为27.27 min /例。在大约75%的情况下观察到无缝连接。结论本研究验证了WSI在FS远程诊断中的作用,可安全、有效地应用于临床。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of Remote Digital Pathology based diagnostic reporting of Frozen Sections from home

Background

Despite the promising applications of whole-slide imaging (WSI) for frozen section (FS) diagnosis, its adoption for remote reporting is limited.

Objective

To assess the feasibility and performance of home-based remote digital consultation for FS diagnosis.

Material & Method

Cases accessioned beyond regular working hours (5 pm–10 pm) were reported simultaneously using optical microscopy (OM) and WSI. Validation of WSI for FS diagnosis from a remote site, i.e. home, was performed by 5 pathologists. Cases were scanned using a portable scanner (Grundium Ocus®40) and previewed on consumer-grade computer devices through a web-based browser (http://grundium.net). Clinical data and diagnostic reports were shared through a google spreadsheet. The diagnostic concordance, inter- and intra-observer agreement for FS diagnosis by WSI versus OM, and turnaround time (TAT), were recorded.

Results

The overall diagnostic accuracy for OM and WSI (from home) was 98.2% (range 97%–100%) and 97.6% (range 95%–99%), respectively, when compared with the reference standard. Almost perfect inter-observer (k = 0.993) and intra-observer (k = 0.987) agreement for WSI was observed by 4 pathologists. Pathologists used consumer-grade laptops/desktops with an average screen size of 14.58 inches (range = 12.3–17.7 inches) and a network speed of 64 megabits per second (range: 10–90 Mbps). The mean diagnostic assessment time per case for OM and WSI was 1:48 min and 5:54 min, respectively. Mean TAT of 27.27 min per case was observed using WSI from home. Seamless connectivity was observed in approximately 75% of cases.

Conclusion

This study validates the role of WSI for remote FS diagnosis for its safe and efficient adoption in clinical use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Journal of Pathology Informatics Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology Informatics (JPI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the advancement of pathology informatics. This is the official journal of the Association for Pathology Informatics (API). The journal aims to publish broadly about pathology informatics and freely disseminate all articles worldwide. This journal is of interest to pathologists, informaticians, academics, researchers, health IT specialists, information officers, IT staff, vendors, and anyone with an interest in informatics. We encourage submissions from anyone with an interest in the field of pathology informatics. We publish all types of papers related to pathology informatics including original research articles, technical notes, reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, editorials, symposia, meeting abstracts, book reviews, and correspondence to the editors. All submissions are subject to rigorous peer review by the well-regarded editorial board and by expert referees in appropriate specialties.
期刊最新文献
Digital mapping of resected cancer specimens: The visual pathology report A precise machine learning model: Detecting cervical cancer using feature selection and explainable AI ViCE: An automated and quantitative program to assess intestinal tissue morphology Deep feature batch correction using ComBat for machine learning applications in computational pathology LVI-PathNet: Segmentation-classification pipeline for detection of lymphovascular invasion in whole slide images of lung adenocarcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1