一项队列研究调查了美国商业保险成年人在COVID-19大流行期间酒精使用障碍治疗模式的变化

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108920
Alisa B. Busch , Ateev Mehrotra , Shelly F. Greenfield , Lori Uscher-Pines , Sherri Rose , Haiden A. Huskamp
{"title":"一项队列研究调查了美国商业保险成年人在COVID-19大流行期间酒精使用障碍治疗模式的变化","authors":"Alisa B. Busch ,&nbsp;Ateev Mehrotra ,&nbsp;Shelly F. Greenfield ,&nbsp;Lori Uscher-Pines ,&nbsp;Sherri Rose ,&nbsp;Haiden A. Huskamp","doi":"10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>We know very little about how the pandemic impacted outpatient alcohol use disorder (AUD) care and the role of telemedicine.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using OptumLabs® Data Warehouse de-identified administrative claims, we identified AUD cohorts in 2018 (<em>N</em> = 23,204) and 2019 (N = 23,445) and examined outpatient visits the following year, focusing on week 12, corresponding to the March 2020 US COVID-19 emergency declaration, through week 52. Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined the association between patient demographic and clinical characteristics and receipt of any outpatient AUD visits in 2020 vs. 2019.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 2020, weekly AUD visit utilization decreased maximally at the pandemic start (week 12) by 22.5 % (2019: 3.8 %, 2020: 3.0 %, percentage point change [95 % CI] = −0.86[−1.19, −0.05]) but was similar to 2019 utilization by mid-April 2020 (week 16). Telemedicine accounted for 50.1 % of AUD visits by early July 2020 (week 27). Individual therapy returned to 2019 levels within 1 week (i.e., week 13) whereas group therapy did not consistently do so until mid-August 2020 (week 31). Further, individual therapy exceeded 2019 levels by as much as 50 % starting mid-October 2020. The study found no substantial differences in visits by patient demographic or clinical characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Among patients with known AUD, initial outpatient care disruptions were relatively brief. However, substantial shifts occurred in care delivery—an embrace of telemedicine but also more pronounced, longer disruptions in group therapy vs. individual and an increase in individual therapy use. Further research needs to help us understand the implications of these findings for clinical outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17148,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 108920"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9613781/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cohort study examining changes in treatment patterns for alcohol use disorder among commercially insured adults in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Alisa B. Busch ,&nbsp;Ateev Mehrotra ,&nbsp;Shelly F. Greenfield ,&nbsp;Lori Uscher-Pines ,&nbsp;Sherri Rose ,&nbsp;Haiden A. Huskamp\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>We know very little about how the pandemic impacted outpatient alcohol use disorder (AUD) care and the role of telemedicine.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using OptumLabs® Data Warehouse de-identified administrative claims, we identified AUD cohorts in 2018 (<em>N</em> = 23,204) and 2019 (N = 23,445) and examined outpatient visits the following year, focusing on week 12, corresponding to the March 2020 US COVID-19 emergency declaration, through week 52. Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined the association between patient demographic and clinical characteristics and receipt of any outpatient AUD visits in 2020 vs. 2019.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 2020, weekly AUD visit utilization decreased maximally at the pandemic start (week 12) by 22.5 % (2019: 3.8 %, 2020: 3.0 %, percentage point change [95 % CI] = −0.86[−1.19, −0.05]) but was similar to 2019 utilization by mid-April 2020 (week 16). Telemedicine accounted for 50.1 % of AUD visits by early July 2020 (week 27). Individual therapy returned to 2019 levels within 1 week (i.e., week 13) whereas group therapy did not consistently do so until mid-August 2020 (week 31). Further, individual therapy exceeded 2019 levels by as much as 50 % starting mid-October 2020. The study found no substantial differences in visits by patient demographic or clinical characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Among patients with known AUD, initial outpatient care disruptions were relatively brief. However, substantial shifts occurred in care delivery—an embrace of telemedicine but also more pronounced, longer disruptions in group therapy vs. individual and an increase in individual therapy use. Further research needs to help us understand the implications of these findings for clinical outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment\",\"volume\":\"144 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108920\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9613781/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547222002021\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547222002021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

我们对大流行如何影响门诊酒精使用障碍(AUD)护理和远程医疗的作用知之甚少。使用OptumLabs®数据仓库去识别行政索赔,我们确定了2018年(N = 23,204)和2019年(N = 23,445)的AUD队列,并检查了次年的门诊访问量,重点关注第12周,对应于2020年3月美国COVID-19紧急声明,直到第52周。使用多变量逻辑回归,我们检查了2020年与2019年患者人口统计学和临床特征与任何门诊AUD就诊之间的关系。结果2020年,每周AUD访问利用率在疫情开始(第12周)时下降幅度最大,为22.5%(2019年:3.8%,2020年:3.0%,百分点变化[95% CI] = - 0.86[- 1.19, - 0.05]),但到2020年4月中旬(第16周)时与2019年的利用率相似。到2020年7月初(第27周),远程医疗占澳大利亚访问量的50.1%。个体治疗在1周内(即第13周)恢复到2019年的水平,而团体治疗直到2020年8月中旬(第31周)才持续恢复到2019年的水平。此外,从2020年10月中旬开始,个体治疗比2019年的水平高出50%。研究发现,患者人口统计学或临床特征在就诊方面没有实质性差异。结论:在已知AUD的患者中,最初的门诊服务中断相对较短。然而,在医疗服务方面发生了实质性的变化——远程医疗的普及,但也更加明显,团体治疗与个人治疗的中断时间更长,个人治疗的使用也有所增加。进一步的研究需要帮助我们理解这些发现对临床结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A cohort study examining changes in treatment patterns for alcohol use disorder among commercially insured adults in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic

Introduction

We know very little about how the pandemic impacted outpatient alcohol use disorder (AUD) care and the role of telemedicine.

Methods

Using OptumLabs® Data Warehouse de-identified administrative claims, we identified AUD cohorts in 2018 (N = 23,204) and 2019 (N = 23,445) and examined outpatient visits the following year, focusing on week 12, corresponding to the March 2020 US COVID-19 emergency declaration, through week 52. Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined the association between patient demographic and clinical characteristics and receipt of any outpatient AUD visits in 2020 vs. 2019.

Results

In 2020, weekly AUD visit utilization decreased maximally at the pandemic start (week 12) by 22.5 % (2019: 3.8 %, 2020: 3.0 %, percentage point change [95 % CI] = −0.86[−1.19, −0.05]) but was similar to 2019 utilization by mid-April 2020 (week 16). Telemedicine accounted for 50.1 % of AUD visits by early July 2020 (week 27). Individual therapy returned to 2019 levels within 1 week (i.e., week 13) whereas group therapy did not consistently do so until mid-August 2020 (week 31). Further, individual therapy exceeded 2019 levels by as much as 50 % starting mid-October 2020. The study found no substantial differences in visits by patient demographic or clinical characteristics.

Conclusions

Among patients with known AUD, initial outpatient care disruptions were relatively brief. However, substantial shifts occurred in care delivery—an embrace of telemedicine but also more pronounced, longer disruptions in group therapy vs. individual and an increase in individual therapy use. Further research needs to help us understand the implications of these findings for clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
220
期刊介绍: The Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (JSAT) features original reviews, training and educational articles, special commentary, and especially research articles that are meaningful to the treatment of alcohol, heroin, marijuana, and other drugs of dependence. JSAT is directed toward treatment practitioners from all disciplines (medicine, nursing, social work, psychology, and counseling) in both private and public sectors, including those involved in schools, health centers, community agencies, correctional facilities, and individual practices. The editors emphasize that JSAT articles should address techniques and treatment approaches that can be used directly by contemporary practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Not in my treatment center: Leadership's perception of barriers to MOUD adoption Peer support to reduce readmission in Medicaid-enrolled adults with substance use disorder National trends in buprenorphine prescribing before and during the COVID-19 pandemic A qualitative analysis of barriers to opioid agonist treatment for racial/ethnic minoritized populations An intervention pilot to facilitate harm reduction service decentralization in Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1