一项关于患者对如何在他们的护理中做出决定的偏好的跨国研究。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Medical Care Research and Review Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1177/10775587221108749
Rachyl Pines, Nicola Sheeran, Liz Jones, Annika Pearson, Aron H Pamoso, Yin Blair Jin, Maria Benedetti
{"title":"一项关于患者对如何在他们的护理中做出决定的偏好的跨国研究。","authors":"Rachyl Pines,&nbsp;Nicola Sheeran,&nbsp;Liz Jones,&nbsp;Annika Pearson,&nbsp;Aron H Pamoso,&nbsp;Yin Blair Jin,&nbsp;Maria Benedetti","doi":"10.1177/10775587221108749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inadequate consideration has been given to patient preferences for patient-centered care (PCC) across countries or cultures in our increasingly global society. We examined what 1,698 participants from the United States, Hong Kong, Philippines, and Australia described as important when making health care decisions. Analysis of frequencies following directed content coding of open-ended questions revealed differences in patients' preferences for doctor behaviors and decision-making considerations across countries. Being well informed by their doctor emerged as most important in decision-making, especially in Hong Kong. Participants in Australia and the United States wanted their doctor to meet their emotional needs. The safety and efficacy of treatments were the most common consideration, especially for Hong Kong. Findings suggest that doctors should focus on information exchange and identifying patient concerns about efficacy, lifestyle impact, cost, and recovery speed. Rather than assuming patients prefer shared decision-making, doctors must assess patient's decision control preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":"80 2","pages":"205-215"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Multinational Study of Patient Preferences for How Decisions Are Made in Their Care.\",\"authors\":\"Rachyl Pines,&nbsp;Nicola Sheeran,&nbsp;Liz Jones,&nbsp;Annika Pearson,&nbsp;Aron H Pamoso,&nbsp;Yin Blair Jin,&nbsp;Maria Benedetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10775587221108749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Inadequate consideration has been given to patient preferences for patient-centered care (PCC) across countries or cultures in our increasingly global society. We examined what 1,698 participants from the United States, Hong Kong, Philippines, and Australia described as important when making health care decisions. Analysis of frequencies following directed content coding of open-ended questions revealed differences in patients' preferences for doctor behaviors and decision-making considerations across countries. Being well informed by their doctor emerged as most important in decision-making, especially in Hong Kong. Participants in Australia and the United States wanted their doctor to meet their emotional needs. The safety and efficacy of treatments were the most common consideration, especially for Hong Kong. Findings suggest that doctors should focus on information exchange and identifying patient concerns about efficacy, lifestyle impact, cost, and recovery speed. Rather than assuming patients prefer shared decision-making, doctors must assess patient's decision control preferences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Care Research and Review\",\"volume\":\"80 2\",\"pages\":\"205-215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Care Research and Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587221108749\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587221108749","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在我们日益全球化的社会中,不同国家或文化的患者对以患者为中心的护理(PCC)的偏好考虑不足。我们调查了来自美国、香港、菲律宾和澳大利亚的1698名参与者在做出医疗保健决定时所描述的重要因素。对开放式问题的直接内容编码后的频率进行分析,揭示了各国患者对医生行为和决策考虑的偏好差异。在做决定时,获得医生的充分信息成为最重要的因素,尤其是在香港。澳大利亚和美国的参与者希望他们的医生能满足他们的情感需求。治疗的安全性和有效性是最常见的考虑因素,尤其是在香港。研究结果表明,医生应注重信息交流,并确定患者对疗效、生活方式影响、成本和恢复速度的关注。医生必须评估患者的决策控制偏好,而不是假设患者更喜欢共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Multinational Study of Patient Preferences for How Decisions Are Made in Their Care.

Inadequate consideration has been given to patient preferences for patient-centered care (PCC) across countries or cultures in our increasingly global society. We examined what 1,698 participants from the United States, Hong Kong, Philippines, and Australia described as important when making health care decisions. Analysis of frequencies following directed content coding of open-ended questions revealed differences in patients' preferences for doctor behaviors and decision-making considerations across countries. Being well informed by their doctor emerged as most important in decision-making, especially in Hong Kong. Participants in Australia and the United States wanted their doctor to meet their emotional needs. The safety and efficacy of treatments were the most common consideration, especially for Hong Kong. Findings suggest that doctors should focus on information exchange and identifying patient concerns about efficacy, lifestyle impact, cost, and recovery speed. Rather than assuming patients prefer shared decision-making, doctors must assess patient's decision control preferences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care Research and Review
Medical Care Research and Review 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Care Research and Review (MCRR) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal containing critical reviews of literature on organizational structure, economics, and the financing of health and medical care systems. MCRR also includes original empirical and theoretical research and trends to enable policy makers to make informed decisions, as well as to identify health care trends. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 25 days
期刊最新文献
Policy and Payment Decisions on Peritoneal Dialysis in the United States: A Review. Association Between Self-Direction and Personal Care Aide Wages. Program Implementation Strategies Associated With Reduced Acute Care Utilization for Medicaid Beneficiaries in California's Whole Person Care Pilot Program. Health Care Use of ACA Marketplace Enrollees During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Changes in Patient Care Experiences and the Nurse Work Environment: A Longitudinal Study of U.S. Hospitals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1