胫骨pilon骨折的Leonetti和Tigani CT分类的观察者间和观察者内差异评估。

IF 1.4 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE International Journal of Burns and Trauma Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Alok Das, Raskesh Malhotra, Amit Srivastava, Anupama Tandon, Anil K Jain, Aditya N Aggarwal, Rajesh Kumar Rajnish
{"title":"胫骨pilon骨折的Leonetti和Tigani CT分类的观察者间和观察者内差异评估。","authors":"Alok Das,&nbsp;Raskesh Malhotra,&nbsp;Amit Srivastava,&nbsp;Anupama Tandon,&nbsp;Anil K Jain,&nbsp;Aditya N Aggarwal,&nbsp;Rajesh Kumar Rajnish","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>tibial pilon fracture constitutes 5-7% of all tibial fractures. The treatment of choice is an open reduction with anatomical articular reconstruction and stable fixation. A relievable fracture classification is needed for the preoperative planning the surgical management of these fractures. Hence, we assessed the inter- and intra-observer variation of Leonetti and Tigani CT bases classification of tibial pilon fractures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective study, 37 patients aged between 18-65 years with an ankle fracture were included. All these patients underwent a CT scan for the ankle fracture, and the CT scan was further evaluated by 5 independent observers (Orthopaedic surgeon). A kappa value was determined for inter and intra-observer variation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Leonetti and Tigani's CT-based classification of the kappa values was 0.657 to 0.751, with a mean value of 0.700. The range of values for the intra-observer variation using Leonetti and Tigani CT-based classification on the kappa values was 0.658 to 0.875 with a mean value of 0.755. The <i>P</i>-value < 0.001 states that there was a significant agreement between the inter-observer and intra-observer classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Leonetti and Tigani Classification have shown substantial inter- and intra-observer agreement, and the \"4B\" subclass of Leonetti and Tigani CT-based classification showed a predominance in the present study.</p>","PeriodicalId":45488,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10195221/pdf/ijbt0013-0051.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of inter and intra-observer variation of Leonetti and Tigani CT bases classification of tibial pilon fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Alok Das,&nbsp;Raskesh Malhotra,&nbsp;Amit Srivastava,&nbsp;Anupama Tandon,&nbsp;Anil K Jain,&nbsp;Aditya N Aggarwal,&nbsp;Rajesh Kumar Rajnish\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>tibial pilon fracture constitutes 5-7% of all tibial fractures. The treatment of choice is an open reduction with anatomical articular reconstruction and stable fixation. A relievable fracture classification is needed for the preoperative planning the surgical management of these fractures. Hence, we assessed the inter- and intra-observer variation of Leonetti and Tigani CT bases classification of tibial pilon fractures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective study, 37 patients aged between 18-65 years with an ankle fracture were included. All these patients underwent a CT scan for the ankle fracture, and the CT scan was further evaluated by 5 independent observers (Orthopaedic surgeon). A kappa value was determined for inter and intra-observer variation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Leonetti and Tigani's CT-based classification of the kappa values was 0.657 to 0.751, with a mean value of 0.700. The range of values for the intra-observer variation using Leonetti and Tigani CT-based classification on the kappa values was 0.658 to 0.875 with a mean value of 0.755. The <i>P</i>-value < 0.001 states that there was a significant agreement between the inter-observer and intra-observer classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Leonetti and Tigani Classification have shown substantial inter- and intra-observer agreement, and the \\\"4B\\\" subclass of Leonetti and Tigani CT-based classification showed a predominance in the present study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Burns and Trauma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10195221/pdf/ijbt0013-0051.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Burns and Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胫骨pilon骨折占所有胫骨骨折的5-7%。治疗的选择是切开复位解剖关节重建和稳定固定。术前规划骨折的手术治疗需要一个可靠的骨折分类。因此,我们评估了胫骨pilon骨折的Leonetti和Tigani CT分类在观察者之间和观察者内部的差异。材料和方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,纳入了37例年龄在18-65岁之间的踝关节骨折患者。所有患者均行踝关节骨折CT扫描,并由5名独立观察员(骨科医生)进一步评估CT扫描结果。测定了观察者间和观察者内部变异的kappa值。结果:Leonetti和Tigani基于ct的kappa值分类为0.657 ~ 0.751,平均值为0.700。基于Leonetti和Tigani ct的分类对kappa值的观察者内变异的取值范围为0.658 ~ 0.875,平均值为0.755。p值< 0.001表示观察者之间和观察者内部的分类之间存在显著的一致性。结论:Leonetti和Tigani分类在观察者之间和观察者内部都表现出很大的一致性,在本研究中,Leonetti和Tigani ct分类的“4B”亚类占主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of inter and intra-observer variation of Leonetti and Tigani CT bases classification of tibial pilon fractures.

Introduction: tibial pilon fracture constitutes 5-7% of all tibial fractures. The treatment of choice is an open reduction with anatomical articular reconstruction and stable fixation. A relievable fracture classification is needed for the preoperative planning the surgical management of these fractures. Hence, we assessed the inter- and intra-observer variation of Leonetti and Tigani CT bases classification of tibial pilon fractures.

Materials and methods: In this prospective study, 37 patients aged between 18-65 years with an ankle fracture were included. All these patients underwent a CT scan for the ankle fracture, and the CT scan was further evaluated by 5 independent observers (Orthopaedic surgeon). A kappa value was determined for inter and intra-observer variation.

Results: Leonetti and Tigani's CT-based classification of the kappa values was 0.657 to 0.751, with a mean value of 0.700. The range of values for the intra-observer variation using Leonetti and Tigani CT-based classification on the kappa values was 0.658 to 0.875 with a mean value of 0.755. The P-value < 0.001 states that there was a significant agreement between the inter-observer and intra-observer classification.

Conclusion: Leonetti and Tigani Classification have shown substantial inter- and intra-observer agreement, and the "4B" subclass of Leonetti and Tigani CT-based classification showed a predominance in the present study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of an enteral nutrition protocol in critically ill patients with burn injuries. Management of post-traumatic ankle deformities in children. Frostbite secondary to antimycobacterial-induced peripheral neuropathy: a case report. Use of autologous platelet-rich plasma for skin graft preservation: an experimental comparative study. Does early stable fixation reduce complications in paediatric femoral neck fractures?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1