胫骨pilon骨折的Leonetti和Tigani CT分类的观察者间和观察者内差异评估。

IF 1.4 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE International Journal of Burns and Trauma Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Alok Das, Raskesh Malhotra, Amit Srivastava, Anupama Tandon, Anil K Jain, Aditya N Aggarwal, Rajesh Kumar Rajnish
{"title":"胫骨pilon骨折的Leonetti和Tigani CT分类的观察者间和观察者内差异评估。","authors":"Alok Das,&nbsp;Raskesh Malhotra,&nbsp;Amit Srivastava,&nbsp;Anupama Tandon,&nbsp;Anil K Jain,&nbsp;Aditya N Aggarwal,&nbsp;Rajesh Kumar Rajnish","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>tibial pilon fracture constitutes 5-7% of all tibial fractures. The treatment of choice is an open reduction with anatomical articular reconstruction and stable fixation. A relievable fracture classification is needed for the preoperative planning the surgical management of these fractures. Hence, we assessed the inter- and intra-observer variation of Leonetti and Tigani CT bases classification of tibial pilon fractures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective study, 37 patients aged between 18-65 years with an ankle fracture were included. All these patients underwent a CT scan for the ankle fracture, and the CT scan was further evaluated by 5 independent observers (Orthopaedic surgeon). A kappa value was determined for inter and intra-observer variation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Leonetti and Tigani's CT-based classification of the kappa values was 0.657 to 0.751, with a mean value of 0.700. The range of values for the intra-observer variation using Leonetti and Tigani CT-based classification on the kappa values was 0.658 to 0.875 with a mean value of 0.755. The <i>P</i>-value < 0.001 states that there was a significant agreement between the inter-observer and intra-observer classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Leonetti and Tigani Classification have shown substantial inter- and intra-observer agreement, and the \"4B\" subclass of Leonetti and Tigani CT-based classification showed a predominance in the present study.</p>","PeriodicalId":45488,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","volume":"13 2","pages":"51-57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10195221/pdf/ijbt0013-0051.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of inter and intra-observer variation of Leonetti and Tigani CT bases classification of tibial pilon fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Alok Das,&nbsp;Raskesh Malhotra,&nbsp;Amit Srivastava,&nbsp;Anupama Tandon,&nbsp;Anil K Jain,&nbsp;Aditya N Aggarwal,&nbsp;Rajesh Kumar Rajnish\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>tibial pilon fracture constitutes 5-7% of all tibial fractures. The treatment of choice is an open reduction with anatomical articular reconstruction and stable fixation. A relievable fracture classification is needed for the preoperative planning the surgical management of these fractures. Hence, we assessed the inter- and intra-observer variation of Leonetti and Tigani CT bases classification of tibial pilon fractures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective study, 37 patients aged between 18-65 years with an ankle fracture were included. All these patients underwent a CT scan for the ankle fracture, and the CT scan was further evaluated by 5 independent observers (Orthopaedic surgeon). A kappa value was determined for inter and intra-observer variation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Leonetti and Tigani's CT-based classification of the kappa values was 0.657 to 0.751, with a mean value of 0.700. The range of values for the intra-observer variation using Leonetti and Tigani CT-based classification on the kappa values was 0.658 to 0.875 with a mean value of 0.755. The <i>P</i>-value < 0.001 states that there was a significant agreement between the inter-observer and intra-observer classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Leonetti and Tigani Classification have shown substantial inter- and intra-observer agreement, and the \\\"4B\\\" subclass of Leonetti and Tigani CT-based classification showed a predominance in the present study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Burns and Trauma\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"51-57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10195221/pdf/ijbt0013-0051.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Burns and Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胫骨pilon骨折占所有胫骨骨折的5-7%。治疗的选择是切开复位解剖关节重建和稳定固定。术前规划骨折的手术治疗需要一个可靠的骨折分类。因此,我们评估了胫骨pilon骨折的Leonetti和Tigani CT分类在观察者之间和观察者内部的差异。材料和方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,纳入了37例年龄在18-65岁之间的踝关节骨折患者。所有患者均行踝关节骨折CT扫描,并由5名独立观察员(骨科医生)进一步评估CT扫描结果。测定了观察者间和观察者内部变异的kappa值。结果:Leonetti和Tigani基于ct的kappa值分类为0.657 ~ 0.751,平均值为0.700。基于Leonetti和Tigani ct的分类对kappa值的观察者内变异的取值范围为0.658 ~ 0.875,平均值为0.755。p值< 0.001表示观察者之间和观察者内部的分类之间存在显著的一致性。结论:Leonetti和Tigani分类在观察者之间和观察者内部都表现出很大的一致性,在本研究中,Leonetti和Tigani ct分类的“4B”亚类占主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of inter and intra-observer variation of Leonetti and Tigani CT bases classification of tibial pilon fractures.

Introduction: tibial pilon fracture constitutes 5-7% of all tibial fractures. The treatment of choice is an open reduction with anatomical articular reconstruction and stable fixation. A relievable fracture classification is needed for the preoperative planning the surgical management of these fractures. Hence, we assessed the inter- and intra-observer variation of Leonetti and Tigani CT bases classification of tibial pilon fractures.

Materials and methods: In this prospective study, 37 patients aged between 18-65 years with an ankle fracture were included. All these patients underwent a CT scan for the ankle fracture, and the CT scan was further evaluated by 5 independent observers (Orthopaedic surgeon). A kappa value was determined for inter and intra-observer variation.

Results: Leonetti and Tigani's CT-based classification of the kappa values was 0.657 to 0.751, with a mean value of 0.700. The range of values for the intra-observer variation using Leonetti and Tigani CT-based classification on the kappa values was 0.658 to 0.875 with a mean value of 0.755. The P-value < 0.001 states that there was a significant agreement between the inter-observer and intra-observer classification.

Conclusion: Leonetti and Tigani Classification have shown substantial inter- and intra-observer agreement, and the "4B" subclass of Leonetti and Tigani CT-based classification showed a predominance in the present study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chondromyxoid fibroma of distal phalanx of great toe: a rare case report with literature review. Ideal burn resuscitation: a step toward resolving the dilemma in acute flame burn management. Safety and effectiveness of micropigmentation skin grafting using the Meek method. Study on the application of deep learning artificial intelligence techniques in the diagnosis of nasal bone fracture. Surgical treatment of mammalian bites----experience in the management of facial wounds by dog and cat bite in China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1