ReCell®用于治疗小儿烧伤的单一机构案例系列。

IF 1.4 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE International Journal of Burns and Trauma Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Samantha Jane Wala, Kelli Patterson, Steven Scoville, Shruthi Srinivas, Dana Noffsinger, Renata Fabia, Rajan K Thakkar, Dana M Schwartz
{"title":"ReCell®用于治疗小儿烧伤的单一机构案例系列。","authors":"Samantha Jane Wala,&nbsp;Kelli Patterson,&nbsp;Steven Scoville,&nbsp;Shruthi Srinivas,&nbsp;Dana Noffsinger,&nbsp;Renata Fabia,&nbsp;Rajan K Thakkar,&nbsp;Dana M Schwartz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thermal injury has a significant impact on disability and morbidity in pediatric patients. Challenges in caring for pediatric burn patients include limited donor sites for large total body surface area (TBSA) burn as well as optimization of wound management for long term growth and cosmesis. ReCell<sup>®</sup> technology produces autologous skin cell suspensions from minimal donor split-thickness skin samples, allowing for expanded coverage using minimal donor skin. Most literature on outcomes reports on adult patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We present the largest to-date retrospective review of ReCell<sup>®</sup> technology use in pediatric patients at a single pediatric burn center.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients were treated at a quaternary care, free-standing, American Burn Association verified Pediatric Burn Center. A retrospective chart review was performed from September 2019 to March 2022, during which time twenty-one pediatric burn patients had been treated with ReCell<sup>®</sup> technology. Patient information was collected, including demographics, hospital course, burn wound characteristics, number of ReCell<sup>®</sup> applications, adjunct procedures, complications, healing time, Vancouver scar scale measurements, and follow-up. A descriptive analysis was performed, and medians were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median TBSA burn on initial presentation was 31% (ranging 4%-86%). The majority of patients (95.2%) had placement of a dermal substrate prior to ReCell<sup>®</sup> application. Four patients did not receive split thickness skin grafting with their ReCell<sup>®</sup> treatment. The median time between date of burn injury and first ReCell<sup>®</sup> application was 18 days (ranging 5-43 days). The number of ReCell<sup>®</sup> applications ranged from 1-4 per patient. Median time until wound was classified as healed was 81 days (ranging 39-573 days). The median maximum Vancouver scar scale measurement per patient at time healed was 8, ranging from 3-14. Five patients who received skin grafts had graft loss and three of these patients had graft loss from areas with ReCell<sup>®</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ReCell<sup>®</sup> technology provides an additional method for wound coverage, either on its own or in conjunction with split thickness skin grafting, and is safe and effective in pediatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":45488,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","volume":"13 2","pages":"78-88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10195214/pdf/ijbt0013-0078.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A single institution case series of ReCell<sup>®</sup> use in treating pediatric burns.\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Jane Wala,&nbsp;Kelli Patterson,&nbsp;Steven Scoville,&nbsp;Shruthi Srinivas,&nbsp;Dana Noffsinger,&nbsp;Renata Fabia,&nbsp;Rajan K Thakkar,&nbsp;Dana M Schwartz\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thermal injury has a significant impact on disability and morbidity in pediatric patients. Challenges in caring for pediatric burn patients include limited donor sites for large total body surface area (TBSA) burn as well as optimization of wound management for long term growth and cosmesis. ReCell<sup>®</sup> technology produces autologous skin cell suspensions from minimal donor split-thickness skin samples, allowing for expanded coverage using minimal donor skin. Most literature on outcomes reports on adult patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We present the largest to-date retrospective review of ReCell<sup>®</sup> technology use in pediatric patients at a single pediatric burn center.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients were treated at a quaternary care, free-standing, American Burn Association verified Pediatric Burn Center. A retrospective chart review was performed from September 2019 to March 2022, during which time twenty-one pediatric burn patients had been treated with ReCell<sup>®</sup> technology. Patient information was collected, including demographics, hospital course, burn wound characteristics, number of ReCell<sup>®</sup> applications, adjunct procedures, complications, healing time, Vancouver scar scale measurements, and follow-up. A descriptive analysis was performed, and medians were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median TBSA burn on initial presentation was 31% (ranging 4%-86%). The majority of patients (95.2%) had placement of a dermal substrate prior to ReCell<sup>®</sup> application. Four patients did not receive split thickness skin grafting with their ReCell<sup>®</sup> treatment. The median time between date of burn injury and first ReCell<sup>®</sup> application was 18 days (ranging 5-43 days). The number of ReCell<sup>®</sup> applications ranged from 1-4 per patient. Median time until wound was classified as healed was 81 days (ranging 39-573 days). The median maximum Vancouver scar scale measurement per patient at time healed was 8, ranging from 3-14. Five patients who received skin grafts had graft loss and three of these patients had graft loss from areas with ReCell<sup>®</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ReCell<sup>®</sup> technology provides an additional method for wound coverage, either on its own or in conjunction with split thickness skin grafting, and is safe and effective in pediatric patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Burns and Trauma\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"78-88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10195214/pdf/ijbt0013-0078.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Burns and Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:热损伤对儿童致残和发病率有重要影响。儿童烧伤患者护理面临的挑战包括大体表面积(TBSA)烧伤的供体部位有限,以及长期生长和美容伤口管理的优化。ReCell®技术从最小供体分裂厚度的皮肤样品中生产自体皮肤细胞悬浮液,允许使用最小的供体皮肤扩大覆盖范围。大多数关于成人患者结果报告的文献。目的:我们提出了迄今为止在单个儿科烧伤中心对ReCell®技术在儿科患者中的应用进行的最大的回顾性审查。方法:患者在美国烧伤协会认证的独立的四级护理儿科烧伤中心接受治疗。从2019年9月至2022年3月进行回顾性图表回顾,在此期间,21名儿科烧伤患者接受了ReCell®技术治疗。收集患者信息,包括人口统计学、住院过程、烧伤创面特征、ReCell®应用数量、辅助手术、并发症、愈合时间、温哥华疤痕量表测量和随访。进行描述性分析,并报告中位数。结果:初诊时TBSA烧伤中位数为31%(范围为4%-86%)。大多数患者(95.2%)在ReCell®应用前放置了真皮基质。4例患者在ReCell®治疗中未接受劈裂厚度皮肤移植。烧伤至首次应用ReCell®的中位时间为18天(范围5-43天)。ReCell®应用的数量从每位患者1-4个不等。中位伤口愈合时间为81天(39 ~ 573天)。每位患者愈合时的中位最大温哥华疤痕量表测量值为8,范围为3-14。5名接受皮肤移植的患者出现了移植物丢失,其中3名患者出现了ReCell®移植区域的移植物丢失。结论:ReCell®技术提供了一种额外的伤口覆盖方法,无论是单独使用还是与分厚皮肤移植结合使用,对于儿科患者是安全有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A single institution case series of ReCell® use in treating pediatric burns.

Background: Thermal injury has a significant impact on disability and morbidity in pediatric patients. Challenges in caring for pediatric burn patients include limited donor sites for large total body surface area (TBSA) burn as well as optimization of wound management for long term growth and cosmesis. ReCell® technology produces autologous skin cell suspensions from minimal donor split-thickness skin samples, allowing for expanded coverage using minimal donor skin. Most literature on outcomes reports on adult patients.

Objective: We present the largest to-date retrospective review of ReCell® technology use in pediatric patients at a single pediatric burn center.

Method: Patients were treated at a quaternary care, free-standing, American Burn Association verified Pediatric Burn Center. A retrospective chart review was performed from September 2019 to March 2022, during which time twenty-one pediatric burn patients had been treated with ReCell® technology. Patient information was collected, including demographics, hospital course, burn wound characteristics, number of ReCell® applications, adjunct procedures, complications, healing time, Vancouver scar scale measurements, and follow-up. A descriptive analysis was performed, and medians were reported.

Results: Median TBSA burn on initial presentation was 31% (ranging 4%-86%). The majority of patients (95.2%) had placement of a dermal substrate prior to ReCell® application. Four patients did not receive split thickness skin grafting with their ReCell® treatment. The median time between date of burn injury and first ReCell® application was 18 days (ranging 5-43 days). The number of ReCell® applications ranged from 1-4 per patient. Median time until wound was classified as healed was 81 days (ranging 39-573 days). The median maximum Vancouver scar scale measurement per patient at time healed was 8, ranging from 3-14. Five patients who received skin grafts had graft loss and three of these patients had graft loss from areas with ReCell®.

Conclusion: ReCell® technology provides an additional method for wound coverage, either on its own or in conjunction with split thickness skin grafting, and is safe and effective in pediatric patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Autologous non-vascularized fibula with compression plating in the management of aseptic complex non-union of long bones. Combined awake videolaryngo-bronchoscopy intubation with HFNC preoxygenation for predicted difficult airway in a patient with post-burn mentosternal scar contracture. Comparative outcome of ultrasound guided vs. fluoroscopy guided hydrodilatation in adhesive capsulitis: a prospective study. Evaluation of pain associated with the application of burn dressings. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour presenting as pathological fracture of proximal femur in neurofibromatosis type-1: a case report with brief literature search.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1