对腹膜炎风险、预防、诊断和耻辱的看法:对使用腹膜透析的患者和亲属进行的混合方法研究结果。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Journal of renal care Pub Date : 2023-03-22 DOI:10.1111/jorc.12464
Jessica Baillie BN (Hons), PhD, RN, Paul Gill BSc (Hons), PhD, RN, Molly Courtenay BSc (Hons), PhD, RGN
{"title":"对腹膜炎风险、预防、诊断和耻辱的看法:对使用腹膜透析的患者和亲属进行的混合方法研究结果。","authors":"Jessica Baillie BN (Hons), PhD, RN,&nbsp;Paul Gill BSc (Hons), PhD, RN,&nbsp;Molly Courtenay BSc (Hons), PhD, RGN","doi":"10.1111/jorc.12464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Peritonitis is the main treatment-related complication of peritoneal dialysis and a primary concern for patients and their relatives. Therefore, understanding their perceptions of peritonitis is important.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To explore patients' and relatives' perceptions of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis risk, prevention measures and experiences of diagnosis, and experience of perceived stigma.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A sequential mixed methods study design was used, including a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>Patients using peritoneal dialysis and relatives (<i>n</i> = 75) from six National Health Service organisations from the United Kingdom.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Measurements</h3>\n \n <p>A structured questionnaire was administered with patients and relatives (<i>n</i> = 75) using peritoneal dialysis; data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Thirty questionnaire respondents were then purposively sampled and interviewed in-depth; data were analysed thematically. Data were collected 2017−2018. Ethical and governance approvals were gained.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Qualitative and quantitative analyses were integrated and three themes presented:</p>\n \n <div>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li><span>• </span>\n \n <p>Perceptions of risk: participants assessed their risk of developing peritonitis and possible implications on their health and relatives. Participants felt greatly responsible for preventing infection.</p>\n </li>\n \n <li><span>• </span>\n \n <p>Preventing peritonitis: participants reported similar and some differing measures to minimise their risk of developing peritonitis. Participants wanted to be seen as “clean”.</p>\n </li>\n \n <li><span>• </span>\n \n <p>Diagnosis of peritonitis: peritonitis diagnosis was embarrassing and stigmatising for many individuals. This was influenced by the response of healthcare professionals and the cause of peritonitis.</p>\n </li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>It is important that healthcare professionals are aware of how responsible patients and relatives feel about preventing peritonitis, the emotional effect of this responsibility and crucially the impact this may have on seeking help.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of renal care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jorc.12464","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of peritonitis risk, prevention, diagnosis and stigma: Findings from a mixed methods study with patients and relatives using peritoneal dialysis\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Baillie BN (Hons), PhD, RN,&nbsp;Paul Gill BSc (Hons), PhD, RN,&nbsp;Molly Courtenay BSc (Hons), PhD, RGN\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jorc.12464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Peritonitis is the main treatment-related complication of peritoneal dialysis and a primary concern for patients and their relatives. Therefore, understanding their perceptions of peritonitis is important.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To explore patients' and relatives' perceptions of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis risk, prevention measures and experiences of diagnosis, and experience of perceived stigma.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>A sequential mixed methods study design was used, including a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Participants</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients using peritoneal dialysis and relatives (<i>n</i> = 75) from six National Health Service organisations from the United Kingdom.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Measurements</h3>\\n \\n <p>A structured questionnaire was administered with patients and relatives (<i>n</i> = 75) using peritoneal dialysis; data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Thirty questionnaire respondents were then purposively sampled and interviewed in-depth; data were analysed thematically. Data were collected 2017−2018. Ethical and governance approvals were gained.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Qualitative and quantitative analyses were integrated and three themes presented:</p>\\n \\n <div>\\n \\n <ul>\\n \\n <li><span>• </span>\\n \\n <p>Perceptions of risk: participants assessed their risk of developing peritonitis and possible implications on their health and relatives. Participants felt greatly responsible for preventing infection.</p>\\n </li>\\n \\n <li><span>• </span>\\n \\n <p>Preventing peritonitis: participants reported similar and some differing measures to minimise their risk of developing peritonitis. Participants wanted to be seen as “clean”.</p>\\n </li>\\n \\n <li><span>• </span>\\n \\n <p>Diagnosis of peritonitis: peritonitis diagnosis was embarrassing and stigmatising for many individuals. This was influenced by the response of healthcare professionals and the cause of peritonitis.</p>\\n </li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>It is important that healthcare professionals are aware of how responsible patients and relatives feel about preventing peritonitis, the emotional effect of this responsibility and crucially the impact this may have on seeking help.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of renal care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jorc.12464\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of renal care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jorc.12464\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of renal care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jorc.12464","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹膜炎是腹膜透析治疗相关的主要并发症,也是患者及其亲属最关心的问题。因此,了解他们对腹膜炎的看法非常重要:目的:探讨患者及其亲属对腹膜透析相关腹膜炎风险、预防措施和诊断经验的看法,以及对耻辱感的感受:采用顺序混合法研究设计,包括问卷调查和半结构化访谈:参与人员:使用腹膜透析的患者及其亲属(n = 75),他们来自英国的六个国民健康服务机构:对使用腹膜透析的患者和亲属(n = 75)进行结构化问卷调查;使用描述性统计对数据进行分析。然后有目的地抽取 30 名问卷调查对象进行深入访谈;对数据进行专题分析。数据收集时间为 2017-2018 年。结果:综合定性和定量分析,提出了三个主题:- 对风险的认知:参与者评估了自己患腹膜炎的风险以及对其健康和亲属可能造成的影响。参与者认为自己对预防感染负有重大责任。- 预防腹膜炎:参与者报告了类似和一些不同的措施,以最大限度地降低其患腹膜炎的风险。与会者希望自己被视为 "干净 "的人。- 腹膜炎的诊断:腹膜炎的诊断让许多人感到尴尬和耻辱。这受到医护人员的反应和腹膜炎病因的影响:医护人员必须意识到患者和亲属在预防腹膜炎方面的责任感、这种责任感所带来的情绪影响,以及最重要的是这种影响可能对寻求帮助产生的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perceptions of peritonitis risk, prevention, diagnosis and stigma: Findings from a mixed methods study with patients and relatives using peritoneal dialysis

Background

Peritonitis is the main treatment-related complication of peritoneal dialysis and a primary concern for patients and their relatives. Therefore, understanding their perceptions of peritonitis is important.

Objectives

To explore patients' and relatives' perceptions of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis risk, prevention measures and experiences of diagnosis, and experience of perceived stigma.

Design

A sequential mixed methods study design was used, including a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews.

Participants

Patients using peritoneal dialysis and relatives (n = 75) from six National Health Service organisations from the United Kingdom.

Measurements

A structured questionnaire was administered with patients and relatives (n = 75) using peritoneal dialysis; data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Thirty questionnaire respondents were then purposively sampled and interviewed in-depth; data were analysed thematically. Data were collected 2017−2018. Ethical and governance approvals were gained.

Results

Qualitative and quantitative analyses were integrated and three themes presented:

  • Perceptions of risk: participants assessed their risk of developing peritonitis and possible implications on their health and relatives. Participants felt greatly responsible for preventing infection.

  • Preventing peritonitis: participants reported similar and some differing measures to minimise their risk of developing peritonitis. Participants wanted to be seen as “clean”.

  • Diagnosis of peritonitis: peritonitis diagnosis was embarrassing and stigmatising for many individuals. This was influenced by the response of healthcare professionals and the cause of peritonitis.

Conclusions

It is important that healthcare professionals are aware of how responsible patients and relatives feel about preventing peritonitis, the emotional effect of this responsibility and crucially the impact this may have on seeking help.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of renal care
Journal of renal care Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Journal of Renal Care (JORC), formally EDTNA/ERCA Journal, is the official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Nursing Association/European Renal Care Association (EDTNA/ERCA). The Journal of Renal Care is an international peer-reviewed journal for the multi-professional health care team caring for people with kidney disease and those who research this specialised area of health care. Kidney disease is a chronic illness with four basic treatments: haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis conservative management and transplantation, which includes emptive transplantation, living donor & cadavaric transplantation. The continuous world-wide increase of people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) means that research and shared knowledge into the causes and treatment is vital to delay the progression of CKD and to improve treatments and the care given. The Journal of Renal Care is an important journal for all health-care professionals working in this and associated conditions, such as diabetes and cardio-vascular disease amongst others. It covers the trajectory of the disease from the first diagnosis to palliative care and includes acute renal injury. The Journal of Renal Care accepts that kidney disease affects not only the patients but also their families and significant others and provides a forum for both the psycho-social and physiological aspects of the disease.
期刊最新文献
Perspectives of Chinese nephrology nurses on discussing sexual dysfunction with patients receiving haemodialysis: A qualitative study Self-efficacy and home dialysis: An integrative review. Understanding nurses' perceptions of sexual health and function in people requiring haemodialysis. Issue Information: Journal of Renal Care 3/2024 Young adults with kidney failure lived experiences of kidney replacement therapy decision-making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1