利用单细胞RNA测序数据,机器学习在胶质母细胞瘤内异质性研究中的应用。

IF 2.5 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Briefings in Functional Genomics Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1093/bfgp/elad002
Harold Brayan Arteaga-Arteaga, Mariana S Candamil-Cortés, Brian Breaux, Pablo Guillen-Rondon, Simon Orozco-Arias, Reinel Tabares-Soto
{"title":"利用单细胞RNA测序数据,机器学习在胶质母细胞瘤内异质性研究中的应用。","authors":"Harold Brayan Arteaga-Arteaga, Mariana S Candamil-Cortés, Brian Breaux, Pablo Guillen-Rondon, Simon Orozco-Arias, Reinel Tabares-Soto","doi":"10.1093/bfgp/elad002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing all fields that affect people's lives and health. One of the most critical applications is in the study of tumors. It is the case of glioblastoma (GBM) that has behaviors that need to be understood to develop effective therapies. Due to advances in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), it is possible to understand the cellular and molecular heterogeneity in the GBM. Given that there are different cell groups in these tumors, there is a need to apply Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. It will allow extracting information to understand how cancer changes and broaden the search for effective treatments. We proposed multiple comparisons of ML algorithms to classify cell groups based on the GBM scRNA-seq data. This broad comparison spectrum can show the scientific-medical community which models can achieve the best performance in this task. In this work are classified the following cell groups: Tumor Core (TC), Tumor Periphery (TP) and Normal Periphery (NP), in binary and multi-class scenarios. This work presents the biomarker candidates found for the models with the best results. The analyses presented here allow us to verify the biomarker candidates to understand the genetic characteristics of GBM, which may be affected by a suitable identification of GBM heterogeneity. This work obtained for the four scenarios covered cross-validation results of $93.03\\% \\pm 5.37\\%$, $97.42\\% \\pm 3.94\\%$, $98.27\\% \\pm 1.81\\%$ and $93.04\\% \\pm 6.88\\%$ for the classification of TP versus TC, TP versus NP, NP versus TP and TC (TPC) and NP versus TP versus TC, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":55323,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in Functional Genomics","volume":" ","pages":"428-441"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning applications on intratumoral heterogeneity in glioblastoma using single-cell RNA sequencing data.\",\"authors\":\"Harold Brayan Arteaga-Arteaga, Mariana S Candamil-Cortés, Brian Breaux, Pablo Guillen-Rondon, Simon Orozco-Arias, Reinel Tabares-Soto\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bfgp/elad002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing all fields that affect people's lives and health. One of the most critical applications is in the study of tumors. It is the case of glioblastoma (GBM) that has behaviors that need to be understood to develop effective therapies. Due to advances in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), it is possible to understand the cellular and molecular heterogeneity in the GBM. Given that there are different cell groups in these tumors, there is a need to apply Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. It will allow extracting information to understand how cancer changes and broaden the search for effective treatments. We proposed multiple comparisons of ML algorithms to classify cell groups based on the GBM scRNA-seq data. This broad comparison spectrum can show the scientific-medical community which models can achieve the best performance in this task. In this work are classified the following cell groups: Tumor Core (TC), Tumor Periphery (TP) and Normal Periphery (NP), in binary and multi-class scenarios. This work presents the biomarker candidates found for the models with the best results. The analyses presented here allow us to verify the biomarker candidates to understand the genetic characteristics of GBM, which may be affected by a suitable identification of GBM heterogeneity. This work obtained for the four scenarios covered cross-validation results of $93.03\\\\% \\\\pm 5.37\\\\%$, $97.42\\\\% \\\\pm 3.94\\\\%$, $98.27\\\\% \\\\pm 1.81\\\\%$ and $93.04\\\\% \\\\pm 6.88\\\\%$ for the classification of TP versus TC, TP versus NP, NP versus TP and TC (TPC) and NP versus TP versus TC, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Briefings in Functional Genomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"428-441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Briefings in Functional Genomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elad002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Briefings in Functional Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elad002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能正在彻底改变影响人们生活和健康的所有领域。其中最关键的应用是肿瘤研究。胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)的行为需要了解,以开发有效的治疗方法。由于单细胞RNA测序(scRNA-seq)的进步,有可能了解GBM的细胞和分子异质性。考虑到这些肿瘤中有不同的细胞群,有必要应用机器学习(ML)算法。它将允许提取信息来了解癌症是如何变化的,并扩大对有效治疗方法的研究。我们提出了基于GBM scRNA-seq数据的ML算法分类的多个比较。这种广泛的比较范围可以向科学界和医学界展示哪些模型可以在这项任务中实现最佳性能。在这项工作中分为以下细胞组:肿瘤核心(TC),肿瘤外围(TP)和正常外围(NP),在二元和多类的情况下。这项工作提出了最佳结果的生物标志物候选模型。本文提出的分析使我们能够验证候选生物标志物,以了解GBM的遗传特征,这可能受到GBM异质性的适当鉴定的影响。本文在四种场景下得到的交叉验证结果分别为:$ 93.03% \pm 5.37\%$、$ 97.42% \pm 3.94\%$、$ 98.27% \pm 1.81\%$和$ 93.04% \pm 6.88\%$,分别用于TP与TC、TP与NP、NP与TP和TC (TPC)、NP与TP与TC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine learning applications on intratumoral heterogeneity in glioblastoma using single-cell RNA sequencing data.

Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing all fields that affect people's lives and health. One of the most critical applications is in the study of tumors. It is the case of glioblastoma (GBM) that has behaviors that need to be understood to develop effective therapies. Due to advances in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), it is possible to understand the cellular and molecular heterogeneity in the GBM. Given that there are different cell groups in these tumors, there is a need to apply Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. It will allow extracting information to understand how cancer changes and broaden the search for effective treatments. We proposed multiple comparisons of ML algorithms to classify cell groups based on the GBM scRNA-seq data. This broad comparison spectrum can show the scientific-medical community which models can achieve the best performance in this task. In this work are classified the following cell groups: Tumor Core (TC), Tumor Periphery (TP) and Normal Periphery (NP), in binary and multi-class scenarios. This work presents the biomarker candidates found for the models with the best results. The analyses presented here allow us to verify the biomarker candidates to understand the genetic characteristics of GBM, which may be affected by a suitable identification of GBM heterogeneity. This work obtained for the four scenarios covered cross-validation results of $93.03\% \pm 5.37\%$, $97.42\% \pm 3.94\%$, $98.27\% \pm 1.81\%$ and $93.04\% \pm 6.88\%$ for the classification of TP versus TC, TP versus NP, NP versus TP and TC (TPC) and NP versus TP versus TC, respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Briefings in Functional Genomics
Briefings in Functional Genomics BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-GENETICS & HEREDITY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.50%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Briefings in Functional Genomics publishes high quality peer reviewed articles that focus on the use, development or exploitation of genomic approaches, and their application to all areas of biological research. As well as exploring thematic areas where these techniques and protocols are being used, articles review the impact that these approaches have had, or are likely to have, on their field. Subjects covered by the Journal include but are not restricted to: the identification and functional characterisation of coding and non-coding features in genomes, microarray technologies, gene expression profiling, next generation sequencing, pharmacogenomics, phenomics, SNP technologies, transgenic systems, mutation screens and genotyping. Articles range in scope and depth from the introductory level to specific details of protocols and analyses, encompassing bacterial, fungal, plant, animal and human data. The editorial board welcome the submission of review articles for publication. Essential criteria for the publication of papers is that they do not contain primary data, and that they are high quality, clearly written review articles which provide a balanced, highly informative and up to date perspective to researchers in the field of functional genomics.
期刊最新文献
Sesame Genomic Web Resource (SesameGWR): a well-annotated data resource for transcriptomic signatures of abiotic and biotic stress responses in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). A comprehensive survey of dimensionality reduction and clustering methods for single-cell and spatial transcriptomics data. AMLdb: a comprehensive multi-omics platform to identify biomarkers and drug targets for acute myeloid leukemia. Advances in integrating single-cell sequencing data to unravel the mechanism of ferroptosis in cancer. Long-read RNA sequencing can probe organelle genome pervasive transcription.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1