评估护士驱动的液体管理方案以改善危重患者的预后。

IF 1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Nursing Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000467
Loraine Barstow, Denise H Tola, Benjamin Smallheer
{"title":"评估护士驱动的液体管理方案以改善危重患者的预后。","authors":"Loraine Barstow,&nbsp;Denise H Tola,&nbsp;Benjamin Smallheer","doi":"10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article reports results of a nurse-driven fluid management protocol in a medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU). Use of static measures such as central venous pressure monitoring, heart rate, blood pressure, and urine output is poor predictors of fluid responsiveness and can result in inappropriate fluid administration. Indiscriminate administration of fluid can result in prolonged mechanical ventilation time, increased vasopressor requirements, increased length of stay, and greater costs. Use of dynamic preload parameters such as stroke volume variation (SVV), pulse pressure variation, or changes in stroke volume with a passive leg raise has been shown to be more accurate predictors of fluid responsiveness. Improved patient outcomes including decreased length of hospital stay, reduction in kidney injury, decreased mechanical ventilation time and requirements, and reduced vasopressor requirements have been demonstrated by using dynamic preload parameters. ICU nurses were educated on cardiac output and dynamic preload parameters and a nurse-driven fluid replacement protocol was established. Knowledge scores, confidence scores, and patient outcomes were measured pre- and post-implementation. The results indicated that there was no change in knowledge scores between pre- and postimplementation groups (mean = 80%). There was a statistically significant increase in nurse confidence in using SVV (P = .003); however, this change is not clinically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in other confidence categories. The study indicated that ICU nurses were resistant to adoption of a nurse-driven fluid management protocol. While anesthesia clinicians are familiar with technologies to evaluate fluid responsiveness in the perioperative setting, the new technology posed challenges to ICU confidence. This project demonstrates that traditional methods of nursing education did not provide the support needed for implementation of a novel approach to fluid management, and that there is a need for further improvement in educational strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10789,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a Nurse-Driven Fluid Management Protocol to Improve Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Loraine Barstow,&nbsp;Denise H Tola,&nbsp;Benjamin Smallheer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article reports results of a nurse-driven fluid management protocol in a medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU). Use of static measures such as central venous pressure monitoring, heart rate, blood pressure, and urine output is poor predictors of fluid responsiveness and can result in inappropriate fluid administration. Indiscriminate administration of fluid can result in prolonged mechanical ventilation time, increased vasopressor requirements, increased length of stay, and greater costs. Use of dynamic preload parameters such as stroke volume variation (SVV), pulse pressure variation, or changes in stroke volume with a passive leg raise has been shown to be more accurate predictors of fluid responsiveness. Improved patient outcomes including decreased length of hospital stay, reduction in kidney injury, decreased mechanical ventilation time and requirements, and reduced vasopressor requirements have been demonstrated by using dynamic preload parameters. ICU nurses were educated on cardiac output and dynamic preload parameters and a nurse-driven fluid replacement protocol was established. Knowledge scores, confidence scores, and patient outcomes were measured pre- and post-implementation. The results indicated that there was no change in knowledge scores between pre- and postimplementation groups (mean = 80%). There was a statistically significant increase in nurse confidence in using SVV (P = .003); however, this change is not clinically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in other confidence categories. The study indicated that ICU nurses were resistant to adoption of a nurse-driven fluid management protocol. While anesthesia clinicians are familiar with technologies to evaluate fluid responsiveness in the perioperative setting, the new technology posed challenges to ICU confidence. This project demonstrates that traditional methods of nursing education did not provide the support needed for implementation of a novel approach to fluid management, and that there is a need for further improvement in educational strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000467\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章报告了在内科外科重症监护病房(ICU)护士驱动的液体管理方案的结果。使用静态测量,如中心静脉压监测、心率、血压和尿量,不能很好地预测液体反应性,并可能导致不适当的液体给药。不加选择地给药会导致机械通气时间延长、血管加压剂需求增加、住院时间延长和费用增加。使用动态预载参数,如冲程容积变化(SVV)、脉冲压力变化或被动抬腿时冲程容积的变化,已被证明是更准确的流体反应性预测指标。通过使用动态预负荷参数,可以改善患者的预后,包括缩短住院时间、减少肾损伤、减少机械通气时间和需求以及减少血管加压药需求。对ICU护士进行心排血量和动态预负荷参数的培训,并建立护士驱动的补液方案。在实施前和实施后测量知识得分、信心得分和患者结果。结果表明,实施前后两组的知识得分没有变化(平均值= 80%)。护士对使用SVV的信心有统计学意义的提高(P = 0.003);然而,这种变化在临床上并不显著。在其他信心类别中没有统计学上的显著差异。研究表明,ICU护士对采用护士驱动的液体管理方案有抵抗力。虽然麻醉临床医生熟悉围手术期评估液体反应的技术,但新技术对ICU的信心提出了挑战。该项目表明,传统的护理教育方法不能为实施流体管理的新方法提供所需的支持,需要进一步改进教育策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of a Nurse-Driven Fluid Management Protocol to Improve Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients.

This article reports results of a nurse-driven fluid management protocol in a medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU). Use of static measures such as central venous pressure monitoring, heart rate, blood pressure, and urine output is poor predictors of fluid responsiveness and can result in inappropriate fluid administration. Indiscriminate administration of fluid can result in prolonged mechanical ventilation time, increased vasopressor requirements, increased length of stay, and greater costs. Use of dynamic preload parameters such as stroke volume variation (SVV), pulse pressure variation, or changes in stroke volume with a passive leg raise has been shown to be more accurate predictors of fluid responsiveness. Improved patient outcomes including decreased length of hospital stay, reduction in kidney injury, decreased mechanical ventilation time and requirements, and reduced vasopressor requirements have been demonstrated by using dynamic preload parameters. ICU nurses were educated on cardiac output and dynamic preload parameters and a nurse-driven fluid replacement protocol was established. Knowledge scores, confidence scores, and patient outcomes were measured pre- and post-implementation. The results indicated that there was no change in knowledge scores between pre- and postimplementation groups (mean = 80%). There was a statistically significant increase in nurse confidence in using SVV (P = .003); however, this change is not clinically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in other confidence categories. The study indicated that ICU nurses were resistant to adoption of a nurse-driven fluid management protocol. While anesthesia clinicians are familiar with technologies to evaluate fluid responsiveness in the perioperative setting, the new technology posed challenges to ICU confidence. This project demonstrates that traditional methods of nursing education did not provide the support needed for implementation of a novel approach to fluid management, and that there is a need for further improvement in educational strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nursing Quarterly (CCNQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides current practice-oriented information for the continuing education and improved clinical practice of critical care professionals, including nurses, physicians, and allied health care professionals.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Nurses' Perceptions of Handover Practices: A Comparative Study in Different Medical Settings. Care Bundle Approach for Oral Health Maintenance and Reduction of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia. Cryoanalgesia for Reducing Unconscious Patients' Pain During Arterial Puncture. Developing and Validating a Bundle for Safe Intra-Hospital Transporting of the Critically Ill Patients: Mixed Qualitative Design With Delphi Approach. Effect of the "aSSKINg" Model in Reducing Pressure Ulcer Risk: A Comparative Study Using the Braden Risk Assessment Score.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1