危重病人根据肾功能不同,高蛋白供给对氮负荷有影响。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.3164/jcbn.22-87
Masaki Mochizuki, Hidehiko Nakano, Daisuke Ikechi, Yuji Takahashi, Hideki Hashimoto, Kensuke Nakamura
{"title":"危重病人根据肾功能不同,高蛋白供给对氮负荷有影响。","authors":"Masaki Mochizuki,&nbsp;Hidehiko Nakano,&nbsp;Daisuke Ikechi,&nbsp;Yuji Takahashi,&nbsp;Hideki Hashimoto,&nbsp;Kensuke Nakamura","doi":"10.3164/jcbn.22-87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adequate protein delivery is recommended in the acute phase of critical illness with kidney dysfunction. However, the influence of the protein and nitrogen loads has not yet been clarified. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit were included. In the former period, patients received standard care (0.9 g/kg/day protein). In the latter, patients received the intervention of active nutrition therapy with high protein delivery (1.8 g/kg/day protein). Fifty patients in the standard care group and 61 in the intervention group were examined. Maximum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) on days 7-10 were 27.9 (17.3, 38.6) vs 33 (26.3, 51.8) (mg/dl) (<i>p</i> = 0.031). The maximum difference in BUN increased [31.3 (22.8, 55) vs 50 (37.3, 75.9) mg/dl (<i>p</i> = 0.047)] when patients were limited to an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <50 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>. This difference increased further when patients were limited to eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>. No significant differences were observed in maximum Cre or in the use of RRT. In conclusion, the provision of 1.8 g/kg/day protein was associated with an increase in BUN in critically ill patients with kidney dysfunction; however, it was tolerated without the need for RRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":15429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition","volume":"72 3","pages":"289-294"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/11/3c/jcbn22-87.PMC10209593.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The nitrogen load is affected by high protein provision according to kidney function in critically ill patients.\",\"authors\":\"Masaki Mochizuki,&nbsp;Hidehiko Nakano,&nbsp;Daisuke Ikechi,&nbsp;Yuji Takahashi,&nbsp;Hideki Hashimoto,&nbsp;Kensuke Nakamura\",\"doi\":\"10.3164/jcbn.22-87\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Adequate protein delivery is recommended in the acute phase of critical illness with kidney dysfunction. However, the influence of the protein and nitrogen loads has not yet been clarified. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit were included. In the former period, patients received standard care (0.9 g/kg/day protein). In the latter, patients received the intervention of active nutrition therapy with high protein delivery (1.8 g/kg/day protein). Fifty patients in the standard care group and 61 in the intervention group were examined. Maximum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) on days 7-10 were 27.9 (17.3, 38.6) vs 33 (26.3, 51.8) (mg/dl) (<i>p</i> = 0.031). The maximum difference in BUN increased [31.3 (22.8, 55) vs 50 (37.3, 75.9) mg/dl (<i>p</i> = 0.047)] when patients were limited to an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <50 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>. This difference increased further when patients were limited to eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>. No significant differences were observed in maximum Cre or in the use of RRT. In conclusion, the provision of 1.8 g/kg/day protein was associated with an increase in BUN in critically ill patients with kidney dysfunction; however, it was tolerated without the need for RRT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"72 3\",\"pages\":\"289-294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/11/3c/jcbn22-87.PMC10209593.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3164/jcbn.22-87\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3164/jcbn.22-87","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建议在肾功能不全的危重疾病的急性期给予足够的蛋白质。然而,蛋白质和氮负荷的影响尚未明确。重症监护病房的病人也包括在内。在前一阶段,患者接受标准护理(0.9 g/kg/天蛋白质)。在后者中,患者接受高蛋白(1.8 g/kg/天蛋白)主动营养治疗的干预。标准治疗组50例,干预组61例。7 ~ 10 d血尿素氮(BUN)最大值分别为27.9(17.3,38.6)和33 (26.3,51.8)(mg/dl) (p = 0.031)。当患者仅限于估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)时,BUN的最大差异增加[31.3 (22.8,55)vs 50 (37.3, 75.9) mg/dl (p = 0.047)]。当患者仅限于eGFR 2时,这种差异进一步增加。在最大Cre或RRT的使用方面没有观察到显著差异。综上所述,提供1.8 g/kg/d蛋白质与肾功能不全危重患者BUN升高相关;然而,它是耐受的,不需要RRT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The nitrogen load is affected by high protein provision according to kidney function in critically ill patients.

Adequate protein delivery is recommended in the acute phase of critical illness with kidney dysfunction. However, the influence of the protein and nitrogen loads has not yet been clarified. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit were included. In the former period, patients received standard care (0.9 g/kg/day protein). In the latter, patients received the intervention of active nutrition therapy with high protein delivery (1.8 g/kg/day protein). Fifty patients in the standard care group and 61 in the intervention group were examined. Maximum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) on days 7-10 were 27.9 (17.3, 38.6) vs 33 (26.3, 51.8) (mg/dl) (p = 0.031). The maximum difference in BUN increased [31.3 (22.8, 55) vs 50 (37.3, 75.9) mg/dl (p = 0.047)] when patients were limited to an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <50 ml/min/1.73 m2. This difference increased further when patients were limited to eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2. No significant differences were observed in maximum Cre or in the use of RRT. In conclusion, the provision of 1.8 g/kg/day protein was associated with an increase in BUN in critically ill patients with kidney dysfunction; however, it was tolerated without the need for RRT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition (JCBN) is an international, interdisciplinary publication encompassing chemical, biochemical, physiological, pathological, toxicological and medical approaches to research on lipid peroxidation, free radicals, oxidative stress and nutrition. The Journal welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of clinical biochemistry and clinical nutrition including both in vitro and in vivo studies.
期刊最新文献
Helicobacter pylori infection and oxidative stress. Characterized factors of subjects who were first time diagnosed as hyperglycemia more than 126 mg/dl during annual or biannual medical checkups: a case-control study in Japan. Effect of cerium oxide on iron metabolism in mice. Effect of omega-3 fatty acids on sleep: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Effective disruption of cancer cell membranes by photodynamic therapy with cell membrane-adhesive photosensitizer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1