Ahana Shetty, K V Anand, Namith Rai, Ashish Shetty, K Pradeep, A Arvind Kumar
{"title":"牙髓病封闭剂对牙髓常见病原体抗菌效果的体外比较研究。","authors":"Ahana Shetty, K V Anand, Namith Rai, Ashish Shetty, K Pradeep, A Arvind Kumar","doi":"10.4103/jcd.jcd_557_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Overview: </strong>Different types of bacterial species, <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> (<i>E. faecalis</i>), <i>Fusobacterium nucleatum</i> (<i>F. nucleatum</i>), and <i>Porphyromonas gingivalis</i> (<i>P. gingivalis</i>), cause pulpal and periradicular diseases. Hence, the antibacterial efficacy of endodontic sealers is of utmost importance from a clinical point of view.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The main objective of the study is to test the antibacterial efficacy of endodontic sealers against endo microflora belonging to <i>E. faecalis</i>, <i>F. nucleatum</i>, and <i>P. gingivalis</i> species.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The antibacterial effectiveness of five endodontic sealers (AH plus, Apexit, EndoRez, Endomethasone, and Tubliseal) was tested by means of the agar-diffusion test (ADT) and direct contact test (DCT). The bacterial suspension of individual microorganisms was applied separately onto the agar plates for ADT. Subsequently, freshly mixed and set sealer was applied on to the sterile discs. After 48 h of incubation, the inhibition zones were measured. For DCT, the sealers were put in 96-well cell culture plates and overlaid with bacterial suspension and brain heart infusion broth. The bacterial growth density of the liquid was tested by spectrophotometry at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 24 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data were analyzed using ANOVA and <i>post hoc</i> Turkey's test. The present study showed that Endomethasone and AH Plus had a good antibacterial effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the ADT and DCT, Endomethasone showed the greatest antimicrobial effect against <i>E. faecalis</i> when compared to other endodontic sealers. In the ADT, Apexit had no antimicrobial effect on <i>E. faecalis</i>, whereas AH Plus had the greatest antibacterial effect on <i>F. nucleatum</i> and <i>P gingivalis</i>. Whereas in DCT, EndoRez and Endomethasone showed the greatest effect against <i>F. nucleatum</i> and <i>P. gingivalis</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":38892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry","volume":"26 2","pages":"216-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10190082/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>In vitro</i> comparative study of antimicrobial efficacy of endodontic sealers against common pathogens in the dental pulp.\",\"authors\":\"Ahana Shetty, K V Anand, Namith Rai, Ashish Shetty, K Pradeep, A Arvind Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcd.jcd_557_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Overview: </strong>Different types of bacterial species, <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> (<i>E. faecalis</i>), <i>Fusobacterium nucleatum</i> (<i>F. nucleatum</i>), and <i>Porphyromonas gingivalis</i> (<i>P. gingivalis</i>), cause pulpal and periradicular diseases. Hence, the antibacterial efficacy of endodontic sealers is of utmost importance from a clinical point of view.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The main objective of the study is to test the antibacterial efficacy of endodontic sealers against endo microflora belonging to <i>E. faecalis</i>, <i>F. nucleatum</i>, and <i>P. gingivalis</i> species.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The antibacterial effectiveness of five endodontic sealers (AH plus, Apexit, EndoRez, Endomethasone, and Tubliseal) was tested by means of the agar-diffusion test (ADT) and direct contact test (DCT). The bacterial suspension of individual microorganisms was applied separately onto the agar plates for ADT. Subsequently, freshly mixed and set sealer was applied on to the sterile discs. After 48 h of incubation, the inhibition zones were measured. For DCT, the sealers were put in 96-well cell culture plates and overlaid with bacterial suspension and brain heart infusion broth. The bacterial growth density of the liquid was tested by spectrophotometry at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 24 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data were analyzed using ANOVA and <i>post hoc</i> Turkey's test. The present study showed that Endomethasone and AH Plus had a good antibacterial effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the ADT and DCT, Endomethasone showed the greatest antimicrobial effect against <i>E. faecalis</i> when compared to other endodontic sealers. In the ADT, Apexit had no antimicrobial effect on <i>E. faecalis</i>, whereas AH Plus had the greatest antibacterial effect on <i>F. nucleatum</i> and <i>P gingivalis</i>. Whereas in DCT, EndoRez and Endomethasone showed the greatest effect against <i>F. nucleatum</i> and <i>P. gingivalis</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Conservative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"216-220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10190082/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Conservative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_557_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_557_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
In vitro comparative study of antimicrobial efficacy of endodontic sealers against common pathogens in the dental pulp.
Overview: Different types of bacterial species, Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis), Fusobacterium nucleatum (F. nucleatum), and Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis), cause pulpal and periradicular diseases. Hence, the antibacterial efficacy of endodontic sealers is of utmost importance from a clinical point of view.
Aim: The main objective of the study is to test the antibacterial efficacy of endodontic sealers against endo microflora belonging to E. faecalis, F. nucleatum, and P. gingivalis species.
Materials and methods: The antibacterial effectiveness of five endodontic sealers (AH plus, Apexit, EndoRez, Endomethasone, and Tubliseal) was tested by means of the agar-diffusion test (ADT) and direct contact test (DCT). The bacterial suspension of individual microorganisms was applied separately onto the agar plates for ADT. Subsequently, freshly mixed and set sealer was applied on to the sterile discs. After 48 h of incubation, the inhibition zones were measured. For DCT, the sealers were put in 96-well cell culture plates and overlaid with bacterial suspension and brain heart infusion broth. The bacterial growth density of the liquid was tested by spectrophotometry at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 24 h.
Results: The data were analyzed using ANOVA and post hoc Turkey's test. The present study showed that Endomethasone and AH Plus had a good antibacterial effect.
Conclusion: In the ADT and DCT, Endomethasone showed the greatest antimicrobial effect against E. faecalis when compared to other endodontic sealers. In the ADT, Apexit had no antimicrobial effect on E. faecalis, whereas AH Plus had the greatest antibacterial effect on F. nucleatum and P gingivalis. Whereas in DCT, EndoRez and Endomethasone showed the greatest effect against F. nucleatum and P. gingivalis.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Conservative Dentistry (ISSN - 0972-0707) is the official journal of the Indian Association of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics (IACDE). Our journal publishes scientific articles, case reports, short communications, invited reviews and comparative studies evaluating materials and methods in the fields of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Materials and Endodontics. J Conserv Dent has a diverse readership that includes full-time clinicians, full-time academicians, residents, students and scientists. Effective communication with this diverse readership requires careful attention to writing style.