从坚韧不拔的女孩到(更)坚韧不拔的妇女:对南非年轻女性复原力叙述的混合方法研究。

IF 0.7 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies Pub Date : 2022-09-06 DOI:10.1080/17450128.2022.2124339
Ashleigh LoVette, Abigail Harrison, Catherine Mathews, Kim Jonas, Don Operario, Caroline Kuo
{"title":"从坚韧不拔的女孩到(更)坚韧不拔的妇女:对南非年轻女性复原力叙述的混合方法研究。","authors":"Ashleigh LoVette, Abigail Harrison, Catherine Mathews, Kim Jonas, Don Operario, Caroline Kuo","doi":"10.1080/17450128.2022.2124339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adolescence and emerging adulthood are times of heightened adversity for South African girls and young women due to structural disadvantage. In this mixed-methods study, we explored lived experiences of resilience among a sample of 377 South African girls and young women (15-24 years) who completed a quantitative cross-sectional survey that included a validated measure of resilience. Quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics and an independent sample t-test to assess differences in resilience. These analyses informed the development of a semi-structured qualitative interview agenda. A purposive sample of 21 South African girls and young women (15-24 years) from the same survey area participated in in-depth interviews. Interviews were analyzed for perceptions of difference in resilience by age and narratives of resilience during transitions to adulthood. Survey results indicated younger participants (15-17 years) perceived themselves to be less resilient than older participants (18-24 years). Qualitative interview results supported the survey results, and pointed to a broader difference in perceived resilience between younger women and older women. Programming and policy implications for future resilience research among this population are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46101,"journal":{"name":"Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies","volume":"18 2","pages":"218-230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10193273/pdf/nihms-1866139.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From resilient girls to (more) resilient women: A mixed-methods study examining narratives of resilience among South African young women.\",\"authors\":\"Ashleigh LoVette, Abigail Harrison, Catherine Mathews, Kim Jonas, Don Operario, Caroline Kuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17450128.2022.2124339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Adolescence and emerging adulthood are times of heightened adversity for South African girls and young women due to structural disadvantage. In this mixed-methods study, we explored lived experiences of resilience among a sample of 377 South African girls and young women (15-24 years) who completed a quantitative cross-sectional survey that included a validated measure of resilience. Quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics and an independent sample t-test to assess differences in resilience. These analyses informed the development of a semi-structured qualitative interview agenda. A purposive sample of 21 South African girls and young women (15-24 years) from the same survey area participated in in-depth interviews. Interviews were analyzed for perceptions of difference in resilience by age and narratives of resilience during transitions to adulthood. Survey results indicated younger participants (15-17 years) perceived themselves to be less resilient than older participants (18-24 years). Qualitative interview results supported the survey results, and pointed to a broader difference in perceived resilience between younger women and older women. Programming and policy implications for future resilience research among this population are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"218-230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10193273/pdf/nihms-1866139.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17450128.2022.2124339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17450128.2022.2124339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于结构上的劣势,对于南非女孩和年轻女性来说,青春期和成年期是逆境加剧的时期。在这项混合方法研究中,我们探讨了 377 名南非女孩和年轻女性(15-24 岁)的抗逆力生活经历,她们完成了一项定量横截面调查,其中包括一项经过验证的抗逆力测量方法。定量分析包括描述性统计和独立样本 t 检验,以评估复原力的差异。这些分析为制定半结构化定性访谈议程提供了依据。来自同一调查地区的 21 名南非女孩和年轻女性(15-24 岁)参加了深度访谈。对访谈内容进行了分析,以了解不同年龄段对抗逆能力差异的看法,以及在向成年过渡期间对抗逆能力的叙述。调查结果显示,与年龄较大的参与者(18-24 岁)相比,年龄较小的参与者(15-17 岁)认为自己的抗挫折能力较弱。定性访谈的结果支持了调查结果,并指出年轻女性和年长女性在抗逆力方面存在更广泛的差异。本文讨论了未来在这一人群中开展复原力研究的计划和政策影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From resilient girls to (more) resilient women: A mixed-methods study examining narratives of resilience among South African young women.

Adolescence and emerging adulthood are times of heightened adversity for South African girls and young women due to structural disadvantage. In this mixed-methods study, we explored lived experiences of resilience among a sample of 377 South African girls and young women (15-24 years) who completed a quantitative cross-sectional survey that included a validated measure of resilience. Quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics and an independent sample t-test to assess differences in resilience. These analyses informed the development of a semi-structured qualitative interview agenda. A purposive sample of 21 South African girls and young women (15-24 years) from the same survey area participated in in-depth interviews. Interviews were analyzed for perceptions of difference in resilience by age and narratives of resilience during transitions to adulthood. Survey results indicated younger participants (15-17 years) perceived themselves to be less resilient than older participants (18-24 years). Qualitative interview results supported the survey results, and pointed to a broader difference in perceived resilience between younger women and older women. Programming and policy implications for future resilience research among this population are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies is an essential peer-reviewed journal analyzing psychological, sociological, health, gender, cultural, economic, and educational aspects of children and adolescents in developed and developing countries. This international publication forum provides a much-needed interdisciplinary focus on vulnerable children and youth at risk, specifically in relation to health and welfare issues, such as mental health, illness (including HIV/AIDS), disability, abuse, neglect, institutionalization, poverty, orphanhood, exploitation, war, famine, and disaster.
期刊最新文献
Assessing depression, suicidal behaviors and quality of life in adolescents with chronic illness: the potential role of SDQ-DP scores Assessment of family functioning in adolescents who use substances- a cross-sectional comparative study Condom use correlates among youth living with HIV in South Africa: lessons for promoting safer sex Parenting practices and adolescents’ mental health: Serial mediation by parental acceptance and adolescents’ grit Examining HIV-stigma interventions among youth living in sub-Sahara Africa: a systematic review of the evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1