美国社区老年通信障碍患者的患病率和社会人口统计特征,使用国家健康和老龄化趋势调查

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of Communication Disorders Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2023.106316
Jennifer Y. Oshita , Nancy M. Gell , Michelle L. Stransky , Nicholas S. Reed , Charles D. MacLean
{"title":"美国社区老年通信障碍患者的患病率和社会人口统计特征,使用国家健康和老龄化趋势调查","authors":"Jennifer Y. Oshita ,&nbsp;Nancy M. Gell ,&nbsp;Michelle L. Stransky ,&nbsp;Nicholas S. Reed ,&nbsp;Charles D. MacLean","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2023.106316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Identifying the population-level prevalence of a disability group is a prerequisite to monitoring their inclusion in society. The prevalence and sociodemographic characteristics of older adults with communication disabilities (CDs) are not well established in the literature. In this study we sought to describe the prevalence and sociodemographic characteristics of community-dwelling older adults experiencing difficulties with understanding others or being understand when communicating in their usual language.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the National Health and Aging Trends Survey (2015), a nationally representative survey of Medicare beneficiaries ages ≥ 65 years old (<em>N</em> = 7,029). We calculated survey weight-adjusted prevalence estimates by mutually exclusive subgroups of no, hearing only, expressive-only, cognitive only, multiple CDs, and an aggregate any-CD prevalence. We described race/ethnicity, age, gender, education, marital status, social network size, federal poverty status, and supplemental insurance for all groups. Pearson's chi-squared statistic was used to compare sociodemographic characteristics between the any-CD and no-CD groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>An estimated 25.3% (10.7 million) of community-dwelling older adults in the US experienced any-CDs in 2015; approximately 19.9% (8.4 million) experienced only one CD while 5.6% (2.4 million) had multiple. Older adults with CDs were more likely to be of Black race or Hispanic ethnicity as compared to older adults without CDs (Black 10.1 vs. 7.6%; Hispanic: 12.5 vs. 5.4%; <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001). They also had lower educational attainment (Less than high school: 31.0 vs 12.4%; <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001), lower poverty levels (&lt;100% Federal poverty level: 23.5% vs. 11.1%; <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001) and less social supports (Married: 51.3 vs. 61.0%; <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001; Social network ≤ 1 person: 45.3 vs 36.0%; <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The proportion of the older adult population experiencing any-CDs is large and disproportionately represented by underserved sociodemographic groups. These findings support greater inclusion of any-CDs into population-level efforts like national surveys, public health goals, health services, and community research aimed at understanding and addressing the access needs of older adults who have disabilities in communication.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 106316"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10236317/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and sociodemographic characteristics of US community-dwelling older adults with communication disabilities, using the national health and aging trends survey\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Y. Oshita ,&nbsp;Nancy M. Gell ,&nbsp;Michelle L. Stransky ,&nbsp;Nicholas S. Reed ,&nbsp;Charles D. MacLean\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2023.106316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Identifying the population-level prevalence of a disability group is a prerequisite to monitoring their inclusion in society. The prevalence and sociodemographic characteristics of older adults with communication disabilities (CDs) are not well established in the literature. In this study we sought to describe the prevalence and sociodemographic characteristics of community-dwelling older adults experiencing difficulties with understanding others or being understand when communicating in their usual language.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the National Health and Aging Trends Survey (2015), a nationally representative survey of Medicare beneficiaries ages ≥ 65 years old (<em>N</em> = 7,029). We calculated survey weight-adjusted prevalence estimates by mutually exclusive subgroups of no, hearing only, expressive-only, cognitive only, multiple CDs, and an aggregate any-CD prevalence. We described race/ethnicity, age, gender, education, marital status, social network size, federal poverty status, and supplemental insurance for all groups. Pearson's chi-squared statistic was used to compare sociodemographic characteristics between the any-CD and no-CD groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>An estimated 25.3% (10.7 million) of community-dwelling older adults in the US experienced any-CDs in 2015; approximately 19.9% (8.4 million) experienced only one CD while 5.6% (2.4 million) had multiple. Older adults with CDs were more likely to be of Black race or Hispanic ethnicity as compared to older adults without CDs (Black 10.1 vs. 7.6%; Hispanic: 12.5 vs. 5.4%; <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001). They also had lower educational attainment (Less than high school: 31.0 vs 12.4%; <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001), lower poverty levels (&lt;100% Federal poverty level: 23.5% vs. 11.1%; <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001) and less social supports (Married: 51.3 vs. 61.0%; <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001; Social network ≤ 1 person: 45.3 vs 36.0%; <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The proportion of the older adult population experiencing any-CDs is large and disproportionately represented by underserved sociodemographic groups. These findings support greater inclusion of any-CDs into population-level efforts like national surveys, public health goals, health services, and community research aimed at understanding and addressing the access needs of older adults who have disabilities in communication.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Communication Disorders\",\"volume\":\"102 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10236317/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Communication Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021992423000163\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021992423000163","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言确定残疾群体的人口水平患病率是监测他们融入社会的先决条件。老年人有沟通障碍(CD)的患病率和社会人口学特征在文献中没有得到很好的证实。在这项研究中,我们试图描述居住在社区的老年人在用他们的常用语言交流时难以理解他人或被理解的患病率和社会人口学特征。方法我们对国家健康和老龄化趋势调查(2015)进行了横断面分析,这是一项对年龄≥65岁的医疗保险受益人(N=7029)进行的具有全国代表性的调查。我们通过相互排斥的非、仅听力、仅表达、仅认知、多发CD亚组和任何CD患病率的总和计算了调查权重调整后的患病率估计值。我们描述了种族/民族、年龄、性别、教育、婚姻状况、社会网络规模、联邦贫困状况以及所有群体的补充保险。皮尔逊卡方统计用于比较任何CD组和无CD组的社会人口学特征。结果2015年,估计有25.3%(1070万)的美国社区老年人经历过CD;约19.9%(840万人)只经历过一次CD,而5.6%(240万人)经历过多次CD。与没有CD的老年人相比,患有CD的老年人为黑人或西班牙裔的可能性更大(黑人10.1vs.7.6%;西班牙牙裔12.5vs.5.4%;P<;0.001)。他们的教育程度也较低(低于高中:31.0vs.12.4%;P>;0.001),较低的贫困水平(<;100%联邦贫困水平:23.5%对11.1%;P<;0.001)和较少的社会支持(已婚:51.3对61.0%;P<!0.001;社交网络≤1人:45.3对36.0%;P>;0.001)。这些发现支持将任何CD更多地纳入人口层面的工作,如国家调查、公共卫生目标、卫生服务和社区研究,旨在了解和解决有沟通障碍的老年人的获取需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence and sociodemographic characteristics of US community-dwelling older adults with communication disabilities, using the national health and aging trends survey

Introduction

Identifying the population-level prevalence of a disability group is a prerequisite to monitoring their inclusion in society. The prevalence and sociodemographic characteristics of older adults with communication disabilities (CDs) are not well established in the literature. In this study we sought to describe the prevalence and sociodemographic characteristics of community-dwelling older adults experiencing difficulties with understanding others or being understand when communicating in their usual language.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the National Health and Aging Trends Survey (2015), a nationally representative survey of Medicare beneficiaries ages ≥ 65 years old (N = 7,029). We calculated survey weight-adjusted prevalence estimates by mutually exclusive subgroups of no, hearing only, expressive-only, cognitive only, multiple CDs, and an aggregate any-CD prevalence. We described race/ethnicity, age, gender, education, marital status, social network size, federal poverty status, and supplemental insurance for all groups. Pearson's chi-squared statistic was used to compare sociodemographic characteristics between the any-CD and no-CD groups.

Results

An estimated 25.3% (10.7 million) of community-dwelling older adults in the US experienced any-CDs in 2015; approximately 19.9% (8.4 million) experienced only one CD while 5.6% (2.4 million) had multiple. Older adults with CDs were more likely to be of Black race or Hispanic ethnicity as compared to older adults without CDs (Black 10.1 vs. 7.6%; Hispanic: 12.5 vs. 5.4%; P < 0.001). They also had lower educational attainment (Less than high school: 31.0 vs 12.4%; P < 0.001), lower poverty levels (<100% Federal poverty level: 23.5% vs. 11.1%; P < 0.001) and less social supports (Married: 51.3 vs. 61.0%; P < 0.001; Social network ≤ 1 person: 45.3 vs 36.0%; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The proportion of the older adult population experiencing any-CDs is large and disproportionately represented by underserved sociodemographic groups. These findings support greater inclusion of any-CDs into population-level efforts like national surveys, public health goals, health services, and community research aimed at understanding and addressing the access needs of older adults who have disabilities in communication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Communication Disorders
Journal of Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Communication Disorders publishes original articles on topics related to disorders of speech, language and hearing. Authors are encouraged to submit reports of experimental or descriptive investigations (research articles), review articles, tutorials or discussion papers, or letters to the editor ("short communications"). Please note that we do not accept case studies unless they conform to the principles of single-subject experimental design. Special issues are published periodically on timely and clinically relevant topics.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic assessment of word learning as a predictor of response to vocabulary intervention Editorial Board Shifting from a female-dominated profession: The perceptions and experiences of male students in communication sciences and disorders Cognitive processing biases of social anxiety in adults who do and do not stutter Linguistic factors associated with stuttering-like disfluencies in Japanese preschool and school-aged children who stutter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1