医疗保健家庭保健患者的认知障碍:比较现有措施。

IF 1.2 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-29 DOI:10.1080/01621424.2021.2009392
Julia G Burgdorf, Halima Amjad
{"title":"医疗保健家庭保健患者的认知障碍:比较现有措施。","authors":"Julia G Burgdorf, Halima Amjad","doi":"10.1080/01621424.2021.2009392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is growing interest in understanding home health utilization and outcomes for those with cognitive impairment (CI). Yet, approaches to measuring CI during home health vary widely across studies, with little known regarding potential implications for findings. Among a nationally representative sample of community-living Medicare beneficiaries receiving home health (2011-2016), we compare estimated CI prevalence using four different measures and evaluate measure-specific strengths and limitations. CI prevalence estimates ranged from 18.4% of the sample with probable dementia from national survey data; to 27.8% with diagnosed dementia, from Medicare claims; to 26.7% with memory deficit and/or impaired decision-making and 43.9% with reduced cognitive function, from OASIS. Researchers must be deliberate in their choice of CI measure and transparent regarding its benefits and limitations. Regardless of the measure used, a sizable percentage of home health patients have CI, supporting the importance of ongoing research in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":45875,"journal":{"name":"HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY","volume":"41 2","pages":"139-148"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9018496/pdf/nihms-1766953.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive impairment among medicare home health patients: comparing available measures.\",\"authors\":\"Julia G Burgdorf, Halima Amjad\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01621424.2021.2009392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is growing interest in understanding home health utilization and outcomes for those with cognitive impairment (CI). Yet, approaches to measuring CI during home health vary widely across studies, with little known regarding potential implications for findings. Among a nationally representative sample of community-living Medicare beneficiaries receiving home health (2011-2016), we compare estimated CI prevalence using four different measures and evaluate measure-specific strengths and limitations. CI prevalence estimates ranged from 18.4% of the sample with probable dementia from national survey data; to 27.8% with diagnosed dementia, from Medicare claims; to 26.7% with memory deficit and/or impaired decision-making and 43.9% with reduced cognitive function, from OASIS. Researchers must be deliberate in their choice of CI measure and transparent regarding its benefits and limitations. Regardless of the measure used, a sizable percentage of home health patients have CI, supporting the importance of ongoing research in this area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"41 2\",\"pages\":\"139-148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9018496/pdf/nihms-1766953.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01621424.2021.2009392\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01621424.2021.2009392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有越来越多的兴趣了解家庭健康利用和结果对那些有认知障碍(CI)。然而,测量家庭健康期间CI的方法在不同的研究中差异很大,对研究结果的潜在影响知之甚少。在2011-2016年接受家庭保健的社区医疗保险受益人的全国代表性样本中,我们使用四种不同的测量方法比较估计的CI患病率,并评估特定测量方法的优势和局限性。CI患病率估计范围从全国调查数据中可能患有痴呆症的样本的18.4%;从医疗保险索赔中,诊断为痴呆症的比例为27.8%;26.7%的人有记忆缺陷和/或决策能力受损,43.9%的人有认知功能下降。研究人员必须慎重选择CI测量方法,并对其益处和局限性保持透明。无论采用何种衡量标准,相当大比例的家庭保健患者有CI,这支持了在这一领域进行研究的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cognitive impairment among medicare home health patients: comparing available measures.

There is growing interest in understanding home health utilization and outcomes for those with cognitive impairment (CI). Yet, approaches to measuring CI during home health vary widely across studies, with little known regarding potential implications for findings. Among a nationally representative sample of community-living Medicare beneficiaries receiving home health (2011-2016), we compare estimated CI prevalence using four different measures and evaluate measure-specific strengths and limitations. CI prevalence estimates ranged from 18.4% of the sample with probable dementia from national survey data; to 27.8% with diagnosed dementia, from Medicare claims; to 26.7% with memory deficit and/or impaired decision-making and 43.9% with reduced cognitive function, from OASIS. Researchers must be deliberate in their choice of CI measure and transparent regarding its benefits and limitations. Regardless of the measure used, a sizable percentage of home health patients have CI, supporting the importance of ongoing research in this area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY
HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Home Health Care Services Quarterly continues to publish important research on the cutting edge of home care and alternatives to long-term institutional care for the elderly, disabled, and other population groups that use in-home health care and other community services. The journal is aimed toward service providers and health care specialists involved with health care financing, evaluation of services, organization of services, and public policy issues.
期刊最新文献
Optimism and resilience among the precariat: a gendered analysis of community home-based care work in South Africa. Elderly Health Care Voucher Scheme in Hong Kong: needs assessment and an evaluation of outcomes. Factors influencing interprofessional collaboration in long-term care from a multidisciplinary perspective: a case study approach. Resilience in home and community care registered practical nurses: a scoping review. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare utilization among Home Care Aides in Washington, U.S.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1