血管截肢者基于表现的功能结果测量的临床:一项系统综述。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rehab.2023.101756
Amirah Essop-Adam , Enya Daynes , John S.M. Houghton , Andrew T.O. Nickinson , Robert D.S. Sayers , Victoria J. Haunton , Coral Pepper , Sally J. Singh
{"title":"血管截肢者基于表现的功能结果测量的临床:一项系统综述。","authors":"Amirah Essop-Adam ,&nbsp;Enya Daynes ,&nbsp;John S.M. Houghton ,&nbsp;Andrew T.O. Nickinson ,&nbsp;Robert D.S. Sayers ,&nbsp;Victoria J. Haunton ,&nbsp;Coral Pepper ,&nbsp;Sally J. Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.rehab.2023.101756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Objective physical performance-based outcome measures (PerBOMs) are essential tools for the holistic management of people who have had an amputation due to vascular disease. These people are often non-ambulatory, however it is currently unclear which PerBOMs are high quality and appropriate for those who are either ambulatory or non-ambulatory.</p></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><p>Which PerBOMs have appropriate clinimetric properties to be recommended for those who have had amputations due to vascular disease (‘vascular amputee’)?</p></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><p>MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, EMCARE, the Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Scopus databases were searched for the terms: “physical performance” or “function”, “clinimetric properties”, “reliability”, “validity”, “amputee” and “peripheral vascular disease” or “diabetes”.</p></div><div><h3>Review methods</h3><p>A systematic review of PerBOMs for vascular amputees was performed following COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology and PRISMA guidelines. The quality of studies and individual PerBOMs was assessed using COSMIN risk of bias and good measurement properties. Overall PerBOM quality was evaluated with a modified GRADE rating. Key clinimetric properties evaluated were reliability, validity, predictive validity and responsiveness.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 15,259 records were screened. Forty-eight studies (2650 participants) were included: 7 exclusively included vascular amputees only, 35 investigated validity, 20 studied predictive validity, 23 investigated reliability or internal consistency and 7 assessed responsiveness. Meta-analysis was neither possible nor appropriate for this systematic review in accordance with COSMIN guidelines, due to heterogeneity of the data. Thirty-four different PerBOMs were identified of which only 4 are suitable for non-ambulatory vascular amputees. The Amputee Mobility Predictor no Prosthesis (AMPnoPro) and Transfemoral Fitting Predictor (TFP) predict prosthesis use only. PerBOMs available for assessing physical performance are the One-Leg Balance Test (OLBT) and Basic Amputee Mobility Score (BAMS).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>At present, few PerBOMs can be recommended for vascular amputees. Only 4 are available for non-ambulatory individuals: AMPnoPro, TFP, OLBT and BAMS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"66 6","pages":"Article 101756"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinimetrics of performance-based functional outcome measures for vascular amputees: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Amirah Essop-Adam ,&nbsp;Enya Daynes ,&nbsp;John S.M. Houghton ,&nbsp;Andrew T.O. Nickinson ,&nbsp;Robert D.S. Sayers ,&nbsp;Victoria J. Haunton ,&nbsp;Coral Pepper ,&nbsp;Sally J. Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rehab.2023.101756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Objective physical performance-based outcome measures (PerBOMs) are essential tools for the holistic management of people who have had an amputation due to vascular disease. These people are often non-ambulatory, however it is currently unclear which PerBOMs are high quality and appropriate for those who are either ambulatory or non-ambulatory.</p></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><p>Which PerBOMs have appropriate clinimetric properties to be recommended for those who have had amputations due to vascular disease (‘vascular amputee’)?</p></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><p>MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, EMCARE, the Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Scopus databases were searched for the terms: “physical performance” or “function”, “clinimetric properties”, “reliability”, “validity”, “amputee” and “peripheral vascular disease” or “diabetes”.</p></div><div><h3>Review methods</h3><p>A systematic review of PerBOMs for vascular amputees was performed following COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology and PRISMA guidelines. The quality of studies and individual PerBOMs was assessed using COSMIN risk of bias and good measurement properties. Overall PerBOM quality was evaluated with a modified GRADE rating. Key clinimetric properties evaluated were reliability, validity, predictive validity and responsiveness.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 15,259 records were screened. Forty-eight studies (2650 participants) were included: 7 exclusively included vascular amputees only, 35 investigated validity, 20 studied predictive validity, 23 investigated reliability or internal consistency and 7 assessed responsiveness. Meta-analysis was neither possible nor appropriate for this systematic review in accordance with COSMIN guidelines, due to heterogeneity of the data. Thirty-four different PerBOMs were identified of which only 4 are suitable for non-ambulatory vascular amputees. The Amputee Mobility Predictor no Prosthesis (AMPnoPro) and Transfemoral Fitting Predictor (TFP) predict prosthesis use only. PerBOMs available for assessing physical performance are the One-Leg Balance Test (OLBT) and Basic Amputee Mobility Score (BAMS).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>At present, few PerBOMs can be recommended for vascular amputees. Only 4 are available for non-ambulatory individuals: AMPnoPro, TFP, OLBT and BAMS.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"volume\":\"66 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 101756\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877065723000271\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877065723000271","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:客观的基于身体表现的结果测量(PerBOM)是全面管理因血管疾病截肢患者的重要工具。这些人通常不活动,但目前尚不清楚哪些PerBOM是高质量的,适合那些活动或不活动的人。研究问题:哪些PerBOMs具有合适的临床特性,可推荐给那些因血管疾病而截肢的人(“血管截肢者”)?数据来源:MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、EMCARE、Cochrane Library、CochraneCentralRegisterofControlled Trials(Central)和Scopus数据库检索术语:“物理性能”或“功能”、“临床特性”、“可靠性”、“有效性”,“截肢者”和“外周血管疾病”或“糖尿病”。审查方法:根据基于COnsensus的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)方法和PRISMA指南,对血管截肢者的PerBOM进行系统审查。使用COSMIN偏倚风险和良好的测量特性来评估研究和个体PerBOM的质量。PerBOM的总体质量通过修改的GRADE评级进行评估。评估的关键临床特性包括可靠性、有效性、预测有效性和反应性。结果:共筛选出15259条记录。48项研究(2650名参与者)被纳入:7项仅包括血管截肢者,35项调查有效性,20项研究预测有效性,23项调查可靠性或内部一致性,7项评估反应性。由于数据的异质性,荟萃分析既不可能也不适合根据COSMIN指南进行系统审查。确定了34种不同的PerBOM,其中只有4种适用于非动态血管截肢者。截肢活动性预测无假体(AMPnoPro)和经股拟合预测器(TFP)仅预测假体的使用。可用于评估身体表现的PerBOM有单腿平衡测试(OLBT)和基本截肢活动度评分(BAMS)。结论:目前,很少有PerBOM可推荐用于血管截肢者。只有4种可用于非门诊患者:AMPnoPro、TFP、OLBT和BAMS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinimetrics of performance-based functional outcome measures for vascular amputees: A systematic review

Background

Objective physical performance-based outcome measures (PerBOMs) are essential tools for the holistic management of people who have had an amputation due to vascular disease. These people are often non-ambulatory, however it is currently unclear which PerBOMs are high quality and appropriate for those who are either ambulatory or non-ambulatory.

Research question

Which PerBOMs have appropriate clinimetric properties to be recommended for those who have had amputations due to vascular disease (‘vascular amputee’)?

Data sources

MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, EMCARE, the Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Scopus databases were searched for the terms: “physical performance” or “function”, “clinimetric properties”, “reliability”, “validity”, “amputee” and “peripheral vascular disease” or “diabetes”.

Review methods

A systematic review of PerBOMs for vascular amputees was performed following COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology and PRISMA guidelines. The quality of studies and individual PerBOMs was assessed using COSMIN risk of bias and good measurement properties. Overall PerBOM quality was evaluated with a modified GRADE rating. Key clinimetric properties evaluated were reliability, validity, predictive validity and responsiveness.

Results

A total of 15,259 records were screened. Forty-eight studies (2650 participants) were included: 7 exclusively included vascular amputees only, 35 investigated validity, 20 studied predictive validity, 23 investigated reliability or internal consistency and 7 assessed responsiveness. Meta-analysis was neither possible nor appropriate for this systematic review in accordance with COSMIN guidelines, due to heterogeneity of the data. Thirty-four different PerBOMs were identified of which only 4 are suitable for non-ambulatory vascular amputees. The Amputee Mobility Predictor no Prosthesis (AMPnoPro) and Transfemoral Fitting Predictor (TFP) predict prosthesis use only. PerBOMs available for assessing physical performance are the One-Leg Balance Test (OLBT) and Basic Amputee Mobility Score (BAMS).

Conclusion

At present, few PerBOMs can be recommended for vascular amputees. Only 4 are available for non-ambulatory individuals: AMPnoPro, TFP, OLBT and BAMS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
136
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine covers all areas of Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine; such as: methods of evaluation of motor, sensory, cognitive and visceral impairments; acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain; disabilities in adult and children ; processes of rehabilitation in orthopaedic, rhumatological, neurological, cardiovascular, pulmonary and urological diseases.
期刊最新文献
Return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - prognostic factors and prognostic models: A systematic review. “From pain to neglect behavior of peripheral origin” Diffusion tensor imaging reveals Papez circuit lesions in severe traumatic brain injury with memory disorder. Simulated breathing in virtual reality does not affect perceived effort during the physical rehabilitation of people with long COVID Intensive interdisciplinary specialized rehabilitation or regular physiotherapy for multiple sclerosis? A randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1