Quan Guo, Liang Peng, Lixin Rao, Cao Ma, Kang Zhao, Zhenzhou Zhao, Haiyu Tang, Muwei Li
{"title":"“l -三明治”策略治疗真冠状动脉分叉病变:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Quan Guo, Liang Peng, Lixin Rao, Cao Ma, Kang Zhao, Zhenzhou Zhao, Haiyu Tang, Muwei Li","doi":"10.1155/2023/6889836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study explored the efficacy of the \"<i>L</i>-sandwich\" strategy, which involves the implantation of stents in the main vessel (MV) and shaft of the side branch (SB) with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) applied to the SB ostium, for coronary true bifurcation lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Of 99 patients with true bifurcation lesions, 38 patients underwent the \"<i>L</i>-sandwich\" strategy (group <i>A</i>), 32 patients underwent a two-stent strategy (group <i>B</i>), and 29 patients underwent a single-stent + DCB strategy (group <i>C</i>). Angiography outcomes (late lumen loss [LLL], minimum lumen diameter [MLD]), and clinical outcomes (major adverse cardiac events [MACEs]) were analyzed. At 6 months, the MLD of the SB ostium in groups <i>A</i> and <i>B</i> were similar (<i>P</i> > 0.05) and group <i>A</i> larger than group <i>C</i> (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The LLL of group <i>B</i> was the largest among the three groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The MLD of the SB shaft in groups <i>A</i> and <i>B</i> were larger than in group <i>C</i> (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The LLL of the SB shaft in group <i>C</i> was the lowest (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Two patients in group <i>B</i> received target vessel revascularization at the 6-month followup (<i>P</i> > 0.05), and patients in the other groups had no MACEs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The \"<i>L</i>-sandwich\" strategy was feasible for the treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions. It is a simpler procedure with similar acute lumen gain than the two-stent strategy, results in a larger SB lumen than the single-stent + DCB strategy, and it can also be used as a remedy for dissection following the single-stent + DCB strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2023 ","pages":"6889836"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The \\\"<i>L</i>-Sandwich\\\" Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Quan Guo, Liang Peng, Lixin Rao, Cao Ma, Kang Zhao, Zhenzhou Zhao, Haiyu Tang, Muwei Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/6889836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study explored the efficacy of the \\\"<i>L</i>-sandwich\\\" strategy, which involves the implantation of stents in the main vessel (MV) and shaft of the side branch (SB) with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) applied to the SB ostium, for coronary true bifurcation lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Of 99 patients with true bifurcation lesions, 38 patients underwent the \\\"<i>L</i>-sandwich\\\" strategy (group <i>A</i>), 32 patients underwent a two-stent strategy (group <i>B</i>), and 29 patients underwent a single-stent + DCB strategy (group <i>C</i>). Angiography outcomes (late lumen loss [LLL], minimum lumen diameter [MLD]), and clinical outcomes (major adverse cardiac events [MACEs]) were analyzed. At 6 months, the MLD of the SB ostium in groups <i>A</i> and <i>B</i> were similar (<i>P</i> > 0.05) and group <i>A</i> larger than group <i>C</i> (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The LLL of group <i>B</i> was the largest among the three groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The MLD of the SB shaft in groups <i>A</i> and <i>B</i> were larger than in group <i>C</i> (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The LLL of the SB shaft in group <i>C</i> was the lowest (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Two patients in group <i>B</i> received target vessel revascularization at the 6-month followup (<i>P</i> > 0.05), and patients in the other groups had no MACEs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The \\\"<i>L</i>-sandwich\\\" strategy was feasible for the treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions. It is a simpler procedure with similar acute lumen gain than the two-stent strategy, results in a larger SB lumen than the single-stent + DCB strategy, and it can also be used as a remedy for dissection following the single-stent + DCB strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of interventional cardiology\",\"volume\":\"2023 \",\"pages\":\"6889836\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049845/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of interventional cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6889836\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6889836","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The "L-Sandwich" Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Background: This study explored the efficacy of the "L-sandwich" strategy, which involves the implantation of stents in the main vessel (MV) and shaft of the side branch (SB) with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) applied to the SB ostium, for coronary true bifurcation lesions.
Methods and results: Of 99 patients with true bifurcation lesions, 38 patients underwent the "L-sandwich" strategy (group A), 32 patients underwent a two-stent strategy (group B), and 29 patients underwent a single-stent + DCB strategy (group C). Angiography outcomes (late lumen loss [LLL], minimum lumen diameter [MLD]), and clinical outcomes (major adverse cardiac events [MACEs]) were analyzed. At 6 months, the MLD of the SB ostium in groups A and B were similar (P > 0.05) and group A larger than group C (P < 0.05). The LLL of group B was the largest among the three groups (P < 0.05). The MLD of the SB shaft in groups A and B were larger than in group C (P < 0.05). The LLL of the SB shaft in group C was the lowest (P < 0.05). Two patients in group B received target vessel revascularization at the 6-month followup (P > 0.05), and patients in the other groups had no MACEs.
Conclusions: The "L-sandwich" strategy was feasible for the treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions. It is a simpler procedure with similar acute lumen gain than the two-stent strategy, results in a larger SB lumen than the single-stent + DCB strategy, and it can also be used as a remedy for dissection following the single-stent + DCB strategy.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Interventional Cardiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for cardiologists determined to stay current in the diagnosis, investigation, and management of patients with cardiovascular disease and its associated complications. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on new procedures and techniques in all major subject areas in the field, including:
Acute coronary syndrome
Coronary disease
Congenital heart diseases
Myocardial infarction
Peripheral arterial disease
Valvular heart disease
Cardiac hemodynamics and physiology
Haemostasis and thrombosis