“l -三明治”策略治疗真冠状动脉分叉病变:一项随机临床试验。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of interventional cardiology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/6889836
Quan Guo, Liang Peng, Lixin Rao, Cao Ma, Kang Zhao, Zhenzhou Zhao, Haiyu Tang, Muwei Li
{"title":"“l -三明治”策略治疗真冠状动脉分叉病变:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Quan Guo,&nbsp;Liang Peng,&nbsp;Lixin Rao,&nbsp;Cao Ma,&nbsp;Kang Zhao,&nbsp;Zhenzhou Zhao,&nbsp;Haiyu Tang,&nbsp;Muwei Li","doi":"10.1155/2023/6889836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study explored the efficacy of the \"<i>L</i>-sandwich\" strategy, which involves the implantation of stents in the main vessel (MV) and shaft of the side branch (SB) with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) applied to the SB ostium, for coronary true bifurcation lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Of 99 patients with true bifurcation lesions, 38 patients underwent the \"<i>L</i>-sandwich\" strategy (group <i>A</i>), 32 patients underwent a two-stent strategy (group <i>B</i>), and 29 patients underwent a single-stent + DCB strategy (group <i>C</i>). Angiography outcomes (late lumen loss [LLL], minimum lumen diameter [MLD]), and clinical outcomes (major adverse cardiac events [MACEs]) were analyzed. At 6 months, the MLD of the SB ostium in groups <i>A</i> and <i>B</i> were similar (<i>P</i> > 0.05) and group <i>A</i> larger than group <i>C</i> (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The LLL of group <i>B</i> was the largest among the three groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The MLD of the SB shaft in groups <i>A</i> and <i>B</i> were larger than in group <i>C</i> (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The LLL of the SB shaft in group <i>C</i> was the lowest (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Two patients in group <i>B</i> received target vessel revascularization at the 6-month followup (<i>P</i> > 0.05), and patients in the other groups had no MACEs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The \"<i>L</i>-sandwich\" strategy was feasible for the treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions. It is a simpler procedure with similar acute lumen gain than the two-stent strategy, results in a larger SB lumen than the single-stent + DCB strategy, and it can also be used as a remedy for dissection following the single-stent + DCB strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2023 ","pages":"6889836"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The \\\"<i>L</i>-Sandwich\\\" Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Quan Guo,&nbsp;Liang Peng,&nbsp;Lixin Rao,&nbsp;Cao Ma,&nbsp;Kang Zhao,&nbsp;Zhenzhou Zhao,&nbsp;Haiyu Tang,&nbsp;Muwei Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/6889836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study explored the efficacy of the \\\"<i>L</i>-sandwich\\\" strategy, which involves the implantation of stents in the main vessel (MV) and shaft of the side branch (SB) with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) applied to the SB ostium, for coronary true bifurcation lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Of 99 patients with true bifurcation lesions, 38 patients underwent the \\\"<i>L</i>-sandwich\\\" strategy (group <i>A</i>), 32 patients underwent a two-stent strategy (group <i>B</i>), and 29 patients underwent a single-stent + DCB strategy (group <i>C</i>). Angiography outcomes (late lumen loss [LLL], minimum lumen diameter [MLD]), and clinical outcomes (major adverse cardiac events [MACEs]) were analyzed. At 6 months, the MLD of the SB ostium in groups <i>A</i> and <i>B</i> were similar (<i>P</i> > 0.05) and group <i>A</i> larger than group <i>C</i> (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The LLL of group <i>B</i> was the largest among the three groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The MLD of the SB shaft in groups <i>A</i> and <i>B</i> were larger than in group <i>C</i> (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The LLL of the SB shaft in group <i>C</i> was the lowest (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Two patients in group <i>B</i> received target vessel revascularization at the 6-month followup (<i>P</i> > 0.05), and patients in the other groups had no MACEs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The \\\"<i>L</i>-sandwich\\\" strategy was feasible for the treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions. It is a simpler procedure with similar acute lumen gain than the two-stent strategy, results in a larger SB lumen than the single-stent + DCB strategy, and it can also be used as a remedy for dissection following the single-stent + DCB strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of interventional cardiology\",\"volume\":\"2023 \",\"pages\":\"6889836\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049845/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of interventional cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6889836\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6889836","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究探讨了“L-sandwich”策略对冠状动脉真分叉病变的疗效,该策略涉及将药物包被球囊(DCB)应用于侧支(SB)口,在主血管(MV)和侧支(SB)轴植入支架。方法与结果:99例真分叉病变患者中,38例患者采用“L-sandwich”策略(A组),32例患者采用双支架策略(B组),29例患者采用单支架+ DCB策略(C组)。分析血管造影结果(晚期管腔损失[LLL],最小管腔直径[MLD])和临床结果(主要心脏不良事件[mes])。6个月时,A组和B组SB口MLD相似(P > 0.05), A组大于C组(P < 0.05)。B组的LLL在3组中最大(P < 0.05)。A、B组SB轴MLD均大于C组(P < 0.05)。C组SB轴的LLL最低(P < 0.05)。B组2例患者在随访6个月时完成靶血管重建术(P > 0.05),其他组患者均未发生mace。结论:“L-sandwich”治疗真冠状动脉分叉病变是可行的。它是一种更简单的手术,与双支架策略具有相似的急性管腔增益,结果比单支架+ DCB策略更大的SB管腔,并且它也可以作为单支架+ DCB策略后的夹层补救措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The "L-Sandwich" Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: This study explored the efficacy of the "L-sandwich" strategy, which involves the implantation of stents in the main vessel (MV) and shaft of the side branch (SB) with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) applied to the SB ostium, for coronary true bifurcation lesions.

Methods and results: Of 99 patients with true bifurcation lesions, 38 patients underwent the "L-sandwich" strategy (group A), 32 patients underwent a two-stent strategy (group B), and 29 patients underwent a single-stent + DCB strategy (group C). Angiography outcomes (late lumen loss [LLL], minimum lumen diameter [MLD]), and clinical outcomes (major adverse cardiac events [MACEs]) were analyzed. At 6 months, the MLD of the SB ostium in groups A and B were similar (P > 0.05) and group A larger than group C (P < 0.05). The LLL of group B was the largest among the three groups (P < 0.05). The MLD of the SB shaft in groups A and B were larger than in group C (P < 0.05). The LLL of the SB shaft in group C was the lowest (P < 0.05). Two patients in group B received target vessel revascularization at the 6-month followup (P > 0.05), and patients in the other groups had no MACEs.

Conclusions: The "L-sandwich" strategy was feasible for the treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions. It is a simpler procedure with similar acute lumen gain than the two-stent strategy, results in a larger SB lumen than the single-stent + DCB strategy, and it can also be used as a remedy for dissection following the single-stent + DCB strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of interventional cardiology
Journal of interventional cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Interventional Cardiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for cardiologists determined to stay current in the diagnosis, investigation, and management of patients with cardiovascular disease and its associated complications. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on new procedures and techniques in all major subject areas in the field, including: Acute coronary syndrome Coronary disease Congenital heart diseases Myocardial infarction Peripheral arterial disease Valvular heart disease Cardiac hemodynamics and physiology Haemostasis and thrombosis
期刊最新文献
Epidemiological Trends, Etiology, and Burden Study of Heart Failure in China, 1990–2019 A Comparative Analysis of Primary and Bailout ADR in CTO-PCI The Effect of Electromagnetic Interference Produced by Smartphones Using 5G Network on Patients With Permanent Pacemakers (EMS5G-PPM Study) Comparison of Sheathless and Sheathed Guiding Catheters in Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using the DynamX Sirolimus-Eluting Bioadaptor: 12-Month Clinical and Imaging Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1