使用SIM-EDI工具探索模拟程序中的公平性、多样性和包容性:对模拟教育者的反射性工具的影响。

IF 2.8 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Advances in simulation (London, England) Pub Date : 2023-03-31 DOI:10.1186/s41077-023-00250-7
Eve Purdy, Ben Symon, Ruth-Ellen Marks, Chris Speirs, Victoria Brazil
{"title":"使用SIM-EDI工具探索模拟程序中的公平性、多样性和包容性:对模拟教育者的反射性工具的影响。","authors":"Eve Purdy,&nbsp;Ben Symon,&nbsp;Ruth-Ellen Marks,&nbsp;Chris Speirs,&nbsp;Victoria Brazil","doi":"10.1186/s41077-023-00250-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There have been increasing calls for awareness and action related to equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in simulation but a lack of practical guidance for how simulation delivery teams (SDTs) might move towards meaningful transformation. The gap between academic conversations about EDI and how to practically impact SDT attitudes, behaviors, and performance remains considerable. We designed a conversational tool, the SIM-EDI, to bridge the gap between theory and practice for SDTs by enhancing reflexivity and studied its impact locally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We engaged in a collaborative autoethnography to explore EDI within our emergency department SDT shortly after implementing the SIM-EDI. The 12-month ethnography is informed by our team's collection and analysis of data about ourselves and our own experiences using the tool. Data included serial interviews, field notes from simulations and SDT meetings, SDT documents, and self-reflections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found the SIM-EDI tool could be implemented with a team with a high level of readiness. Use of the tool had several meaningful impacts including enhanced team reflexivity, normalization of conversations related to EDI and increased confidence to engage in EDI conversations with participants. Key themes throughout the process included (1) individual and team growth, (2) fear of \"getting it wrong\", and (3) tension between bias towards action and need for slow reflection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SIM-EDI tool can effectively promote reflexivity among faculty in an emergency department simulation program. The tool is easy to use and implement, impacts attitudes and behaviors, and facilitates individual and team growth.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067255/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring equity, diversity, and inclusion in a simulation program using the SIM-EDI tool: the impact of a reflexive tool for simulation educators.\",\"authors\":\"Eve Purdy,&nbsp;Ben Symon,&nbsp;Ruth-Ellen Marks,&nbsp;Chris Speirs,&nbsp;Victoria Brazil\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41077-023-00250-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There have been increasing calls for awareness and action related to equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in simulation but a lack of practical guidance for how simulation delivery teams (SDTs) might move towards meaningful transformation. The gap between academic conversations about EDI and how to practically impact SDT attitudes, behaviors, and performance remains considerable. We designed a conversational tool, the SIM-EDI, to bridge the gap between theory and practice for SDTs by enhancing reflexivity and studied its impact locally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We engaged in a collaborative autoethnography to explore EDI within our emergency department SDT shortly after implementing the SIM-EDI. The 12-month ethnography is informed by our team's collection and analysis of data about ourselves and our own experiences using the tool. Data included serial interviews, field notes from simulations and SDT meetings, SDT documents, and self-reflections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found the SIM-EDI tool could be implemented with a team with a high level of readiness. Use of the tool had several meaningful impacts including enhanced team reflexivity, normalization of conversations related to EDI and increased confidence to engage in EDI conversations with participants. Key themes throughout the process included (1) individual and team growth, (2) fear of \\\"getting it wrong\\\", and (3) tension between bias towards action and need for slow reflection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SIM-EDI tool can effectively promote reflexivity among faculty in an emergency department simulation program. The tool is easy to use and implement, impacts attitudes and behaviors, and facilitates individual and team growth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in simulation (London, England)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067255/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in simulation (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-023-00250-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-023-00250-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:越来越多的人呼吁认识和采取与模拟中的公平、多样性和包容性(EDI)相关的行动,但缺乏关于模拟交付团队(sdt)如何走向有意义的转型的实际指导。关于EDI的学术讨论与如何实际影响SDT的态度、行为和性能之间的差距仍然相当大。我们设计了一个对话工具SIM-EDI,通过增强反身性来弥合sdt理论与实践之间的差距,并研究了其在当地的影响。方法:在实施SIM-EDI后不久,我们在急诊科SDT中开展了一项协作性的自人种志来探索EDI。为期12个月的人种志是由我们的团队收集和分析关于我们自己和我们自己使用该工具的经验的数据。数据包括系列访谈、模拟和SDT会议的现场记录、SDT文件和自我反思。结果:我们发现SIM-EDI工具可以由一个高度准备的团队来实现。该工具的使用有几个有意义的影响,包括增强团队的反射性,与EDI相关的对话的规范化,以及增加与参与者进行EDI对话的信心。贯穿整个过程的关键主题包括(1)个人和团队的成长,(2)对“出错”的恐惧,以及(3)偏向于行动和需要缓慢反思之间的紧张关系。结论:SIM-EDI工具能有效提高急诊科模拟教学教师的反身性。该工具易于使用和实现,影响态度和行为,并促进个人和团队的成长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring equity, diversity, and inclusion in a simulation program using the SIM-EDI tool: the impact of a reflexive tool for simulation educators.

Background: There have been increasing calls for awareness and action related to equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in simulation but a lack of practical guidance for how simulation delivery teams (SDTs) might move towards meaningful transformation. The gap between academic conversations about EDI and how to practically impact SDT attitudes, behaviors, and performance remains considerable. We designed a conversational tool, the SIM-EDI, to bridge the gap between theory and practice for SDTs by enhancing reflexivity and studied its impact locally.

Methods: We engaged in a collaborative autoethnography to explore EDI within our emergency department SDT shortly after implementing the SIM-EDI. The 12-month ethnography is informed by our team's collection and analysis of data about ourselves and our own experiences using the tool. Data included serial interviews, field notes from simulations and SDT meetings, SDT documents, and self-reflections.

Results: We found the SIM-EDI tool could be implemented with a team with a high level of readiness. Use of the tool had several meaningful impacts including enhanced team reflexivity, normalization of conversations related to EDI and increased confidence to engage in EDI conversations with participants. Key themes throughout the process included (1) individual and team growth, (2) fear of "getting it wrong", and (3) tension between bias towards action and need for slow reflection.

Conclusion: The SIM-EDI tool can effectively promote reflexivity among faculty in an emergency department simulation program. The tool is easy to use and implement, impacts attitudes and behaviors, and facilitates individual and team growth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of hybrid simulation training on medical student performance in whole-task consultation of cardiac patients: The ASSIMILATE EXCELLENCE randomized waitlist-controlled trial. Using simulation scenarios and a debriefing structure to promote feedback skills among interprofessional team members in clinical practice. Reclaiming identities: exploring the influence of simulation on refugee doctors' workforce integration. TEAMs go VR-validating the TEAM in a virtual reality (VR) medical team training. Theoretical foundations and implications of augmented reality, virtual reality, and mixed reality for immersive learning in health professions education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1