痴呆症护理中心工作人员痴呆症培训课程评估。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-31 DOI:10.1159/000529856
Natália Duarte, Sara Alves, Barbara Gomes
{"title":"痴呆症护理中心工作人员痴呆症培训课程评估。","authors":"Natália Duarte,&nbsp;Sara Alves,&nbsp;Barbara Gomes","doi":"10.1159/000529856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Literature shows poor dementia training and competencies among health and social professionals. Due to the growing prevalence of people with dementia and all the related care demands, specialized training is increasingly needed but must be effective in terms of impact on knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes. We aimed to analyze the impact of a first-level dementia training course for staff of a new specialized center for people with dementia, considering the first three levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation framework, namely, staff reaction (satisfaction), skills and learning (knowledge and dementia attitudes), and behavior changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center group pre-post design study of a 12-session online course. An online questionnaire was administered to measure satisfaction, expectations, knowledge/learning, attitudes (Dementia Attitude Scale), and new behaviors/practices. We compared perceived knowledge (Wilcoxon signed-rank test) and attitudes (paired t test). Thematic analysis explored new behaviors/practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-five professionals and 1 volunteer were included (median age 31, 92% female). Satisfaction with the training was high (median 4/5). Perceived knowledge improved (median 3-4; p &lt; 0.001). The knowledge test median score was 70.8%. After training, participants showed better attitudes toward dementia (mean 116.5, SD 10.3, to mean 122.2, SD 11.5; p &lt; 0.001). Most (93%) said their behavior/practice changed. Thematic analysis yielded four new behavior/practice dimensions: care provision/interaction, communication, family/caregivers, and self-confidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The course improved all dimensions evaluated, suggesting it effectively provides first-level dementia training. This may be transferable to similar settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"205-213"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10614232/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a Dementia Training Course for Staff of a Center of Dementia Care.\",\"authors\":\"Natália Duarte,&nbsp;Sara Alves,&nbsp;Barbara Gomes\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000529856\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Literature shows poor dementia training and competencies among health and social professionals. Due to the growing prevalence of people with dementia and all the related care demands, specialized training is increasingly needed but must be effective in terms of impact on knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes. We aimed to analyze the impact of a first-level dementia training course for staff of a new specialized center for people with dementia, considering the first three levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation framework, namely, staff reaction (satisfaction), skills and learning (knowledge and dementia attitudes), and behavior changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center group pre-post design study of a 12-session online course. An online questionnaire was administered to measure satisfaction, expectations, knowledge/learning, attitudes (Dementia Attitude Scale), and new behaviors/practices. We compared perceived knowledge (Wilcoxon signed-rank test) and attitudes (paired t test). Thematic analysis explored new behaviors/practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-five professionals and 1 volunteer were included (median age 31, 92% female). Satisfaction with the training was high (median 4/5). Perceived knowledge improved (median 3-4; p &lt; 0.001). The knowledge test median score was 70.8%. After training, participants showed better attitudes toward dementia (mean 116.5, SD 10.3, to mean 122.2, SD 11.5; p &lt; 0.001). Most (93%) said their behavior/practice changed. Thematic analysis yielded four new behavior/practice dimensions: care provision/interaction, communication, family/caregivers, and self-confidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The course improved all dimensions evaluated, suggesting it effectively provides first-level dementia training. This may be transferable to similar settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"205-213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10614232/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529856\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529856","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

引言:文献显示,卫生和社会专业人员对痴呆症的培训和能力较差。由于痴呆症患者的患病率越来越高,以及所有相关的护理需求,越来越需要专业培训,但必须在对知识、行为和态度的影响方面有效。考虑到柯克帕特里克评估框架的前三个层面,即员工反应(满意度)、技能和学习(知识和痴呆症态度)以及行为变化,我们旨在分析一个新的痴呆症专科中心员工一级痴呆症培训课程的影响。方法:这是一项为期12节的在线课程的单中心小组设计前研究。进行了一项在线问卷调查,以测量满意度、期望值、知识/学习、态度(痴呆症态度量表)和新行为/实践。我们比较了感知知识(Wilcoxon符号秩检验)和态度(配对t检验)。主题分析探索了新的行为/实践。结果:85名专业人员和1名志愿者(中位年龄31岁,92%为女性)被纳入。对培训的满意度很高(中位数为4/5)。感知知识得到改善(中位数3-4;p<;0.001)。知识测试的中位数得分为70.8%。训练后,参与者对痴呆症表现出更好的态度(平均116.5,标准差10.3,平均122.2,标准差11.5;p<;001)。大多数人(93%)表示他们的行为/实践发生了变化。主题分析产生了四个新的行为/实践维度:护理提供/互动、沟通、家庭/照顾者和自信。结论:该课程改进了评估的所有维度,表明它有效地提供了一级痴呆症培训。这可以转移到类似的设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of a Dementia Training Course for Staff of a Center of Dementia Care.

Introduction: Literature shows poor dementia training and competencies among health and social professionals. Due to the growing prevalence of people with dementia and all the related care demands, specialized training is increasingly needed but must be effective in terms of impact on knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes. We aimed to analyze the impact of a first-level dementia training course for staff of a new specialized center for people with dementia, considering the first three levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation framework, namely, staff reaction (satisfaction), skills and learning (knowledge and dementia attitudes), and behavior changes.

Methods: This is a single-center group pre-post design study of a 12-session online course. An online questionnaire was administered to measure satisfaction, expectations, knowledge/learning, attitudes (Dementia Attitude Scale), and new behaviors/practices. We compared perceived knowledge (Wilcoxon signed-rank test) and attitudes (paired t test). Thematic analysis explored new behaviors/practices.

Results: Eighty-five professionals and 1 volunteer were included (median age 31, 92% female). Satisfaction with the training was high (median 4/5). Perceived knowledge improved (median 3-4; p < 0.001). The knowledge test median score was 70.8%. After training, participants showed better attitudes toward dementia (mean 116.5, SD 10.3, to mean 122.2, SD 11.5; p < 0.001). Most (93%) said their behavior/practice changed. Thematic analysis yielded four new behavior/practice dimensions: care provision/interaction, communication, family/caregivers, and self-confidence.

Conclusions: The course improved all dimensions evaluated, suggesting it effectively provides first-level dementia training. This may be transferable to similar settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: As a unique forum devoted exclusively to the study of cognitive dysfunction, ''Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders'' concentrates on Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s chorea and other neurodegenerative diseases. The journal draws from diverse related research disciplines such as psychogeriatrics, neuropsychology, clinical neurology, morphology, physiology, genetic molecular biology, pathology, biochemistry, immunology, pharmacology and pharmaceutics. Strong emphasis is placed on the publication of research findings from animal studies which are complemented by clinical and therapeutic experience to give an overall appreciation of the field.
期刊最新文献
Sleep apnea risk, subjective cognitive decline, and cognitive performance: Findings from the Boston Latino Aging Study (BLAST). Hyperbaric oxygen therapy improves motor symptoms, sleep, and cognitive dysfunctions in Parkinson's disease. THE ASSOCIATION OF IMPAIRED VIBRATION SENSATION IN THE LOWER LIMB WITH TESTS OF COGNITION IN OLDER PEOPLE The Cardiovascular Health Study. Effectiveness of the Music Therapy in Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Feasibility and psychometric properties of Integrated Care for Older People Screening Tool for Taiwanese (ICOPES-TW) cognitive screening test.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1